Partners No More: Relational Transformation and the Turn to Litigation in Two Conservationist Organizations

The rise in litigation against administrative bodies by environmental and other political interest groups worldwide has been explained predominantly through the liberalization of standing doctrines. Under this explanation, termed here the floodgate model, restrictive standing rules have dammed the flow of suits that groups were otherwise ready and eager to pursue. I examine this hypothesis by analyzing processes of institutional transformation in two conservationist organizations: the Sierra Club in the United States and the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel (SPNI). Rather than an eagerness to embrace newly available litigation opportunities, as the floodgate model would predict, the groups\u27 history reveals a gradual process of transformation marked by internal, largely intergenerational divisions between those who abhorred conflict with state institutions and those who saw such conflict as not only appropriate but necessary to the mission of the group. Furthermore, in contrast to the pluralist interactions that the floodgate model imagines, both groups\u27 relations with pertinent agencies in earlier eras better accorded with the partnership-based corporatist paradigm. Sociolegal research has long indicated the importance of relational distance to the transformation of interpersonal disputes. I argue that, at the group level as well, the presence or absence of a (national) partnership-centered relationship determines propensities to bring political issues to court. As such, well beyond change in groups\u27 legal capacity and resources, current increases in levels of political litigation suggest more fundamental transformations in the structure and meaning of relations between citizen groups and the state

Multicenter Evaluation of Methods To Quantitate Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA in Seminal Plasma

We have evaluated two commercially available kits (AMPLICOR MONITOR [Roche] and NASBA HIV-1 QT or NucliSens HIV-1 QT [Organon Teknika]) and two noncommercial methods for the accurate quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA in seminal plasma. The same panels of coded specimens were tested on four separate occasions. Laboratories using the commercial assays employed silica beads to isolate HIV-1 RNA, which removed inhibitory factors sometimes found in seminal plasma. Sensitivities and specificities, respectively, for each assay were as follows: AMPLICOR MONITOR, 100 and 73%; NASBA HIV-1 QT, 84 and 100%; NucliSens HIV-1 QT, 99 and 98%; and noncommercial assays, 91 and 73%. When results from the laboratory that was inexperienced with the silica bead extraction method were excluded from the analysis, specificity for the Roche assay increased to 100%. The commercial assays demonstrated highly reproducible results, with intra-assay standard deviations (measured in log(10) RNA copies/milliliter of seminal plasma) ranging from 0.11 to 0.32; those of the noncommercial assays ranged from 0.12 to 0.75. Differences in mean estimated HIV-1 RNA concentrations were ≤0.67 log(10) and were greater at low viral loads. Suspension matrices that used blood plasma or seminal plasma did not make a difference in recovery of HIV-1 RNA, which suggested that blood plasma specimens can be used as external controls for seminal plasma assays. More variation in the HIV-1 RNA viral loads was observed in the seminal plasma values than in the blood plasma values when paired specimens from HIV-1-infected men were tested. Quantitation of HIV-1 RNA in seminal plasma can be reliably accomplished using two commercially available assays, and may be incorporated into the evaluations of HIV-1 seropositive men enrolled in clinical studies

Diminished Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 DNA Yield from Dried Blood Spots after Storage in a Humid Incubator at 37°C Compared to −20°C▿

Collecting whole blood on filter paper simplifies the processing, transport, and storage of specimens used for the diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and other tests. Specimens may be collected in tropical or rural areas with minimal facilities for handling specimens. To compare simulated tropical conditions with freezer storage, we examined the stability of HIV-1 DNA in dried blood spots (DBS) stored in humid heat and at −20°C. DBS were created by spotting 50-μl aliquots of whole blood on 903 filter paper. DNA was extracted from DBS at baseline and after 2, 6, or 12 months of storage at −20°C or at 37°C with ∼85% humidity. The DNA was tested undiluted or diluted using the Amplicor HIV-1 DNA PCR (Roche), version 1.5. Each reaction was scored positive, negative, or indeterminate based on optical density. Results were compared between storage conditions and over time. A total of 1,832 reactions from 916 DBS were analyzed, including 100 DBS at baseline, 418 stored at −20°C, and 398 stored at 37°C. A chi-square test showed fewer positive reactions for DBS stored at 37°C (55%) than for those stored at −20°C (78%) (P < 0.0001). Samples stored at −20°C showed little change in the probability of detection of HIV-1 DNA over time; the odds ratio (OR) was 0.93 after storage for 1 year. Samples stored at 37°C demonstrated a significant change in detection at 1 year (OR, 0.29). We conclude that exposure of DBS to 37°C and high humidity impaired the recovery of HIV-1 DNA from DBS, whereas DNA recovery was preserved when DBS were stored frozen