15,420 research outputs found

    Neutrino Experiments and the LHC: Friends Across 14 Orders of Magnitude

    Full text link
    This proceeding explores some of the questions that connect the LHC and neutrino experiments: What is the origin of mass? What is the meaning of flavor? Is there direct evidence of new forces or particles? The neutrino program investigating these questions is large and diverse. The strategy here, to narrow the discussion, is to focus on relatively new ideas for experiments that may be less known within the LHC community.Comment: Prepared for the proceedings of the LHC Nobel Symposium, held May 13-17, 201

    Limits on Electron Neutrino Disappearance from the KARMEN and LSND electron neutrino - Carbon Cross Section Data

    Full text link
    This paper presents a combined analysis of the KARMEN and LSND nu_e-carbon cross section measurements within the context of a search for nu_e disappearance at high Delta m^2. KARMEN and LSND were located at 17.7 m and 29.8 m respectively from the neutrino source, so the consistency of the two measurements, as a function of antineutrino energy, sets strong limits on neutrino oscillations. Most of the allowed region from the nu_e disappearance analysis of the Gallium calibration data is excluded at >95% CL and the best fit point is excluded at 3.6σ\sigma. Assuming CPT conservation, comparisons are also made to the oscillation analyses of reactor antineutrino data.Comment: Published versio

    Frequency modulation demodulator threshold extension device

    Get PDF
    Threshold extension device for improving operating performance of frequency modulatioin demodulators by eliminating click-type noise impulse

    Precision Measurement of sin^2 theta_W at a Reactor

    Full text link
    This paper presents a strategy for measuring sin^2 theta_W to ~1% at a reactor-based experiment, using antineutrinos electron elastic scattering. This error is comparable to the NuTeV, SLAC E158, and APV results on sin^2 theta_W, but with substantially different contributions to the systematics. An improved method for identifying antineutrino proton events, which serve both as a background and as a normalization sample, is described. The measurement can be performed using the near detector of the presently proposed reactor-based oscillation experiments. We conclude that an absolute error of delta(sin^2 theta_W)=0.0019 may be achieved.Comment: To be Submitted to Phys. Rev.

    Electronic device increases threshold sensitivity and removes noise from FM communications receiver

    Get PDF
    Threshold extension device connected between demodulator output and filter output minimizes clicking noise. Device consists of click-eliminating signal transfer channel with follow-and-hold circuit and detector for sensing click impulses. Final output consists of signal plus low level noise without high amplitude impulses

    Confronting the short-baseline oscillation anomalies with a single sterile neutrino and non-standard matter effects

    Full text link
    We examine the MiniBooNE neutrino, MiniBooNE antineutrino and LSND antineutrino data sets in a two-neutrino ν()μν()e\stackrel{\tiny{(-)}}{\nu}_{\mu}\rightarrow\stackrel{\tiny{(-)}}{\nu}_e oscillation approximation subject to non-standard matter effects. We assume those effects can be parametrized by an LL-independent effective potential, Vs=±AsV_s=\pm A_s, experienced only by an intermediate, non-weakly-interacting (sterile) neutrino state which we assume participates in the oscillation, where +/+/- corresponds to neutrino/antineutrino propagation. We discuss the mathematical framework in which such oscillations arise in detail, and derive the relevant oscillation probability as a function of the vacuum oscillation parameters Δm2\Delta m^2 and sin22θμe\sin^22\theta_{\mu e}, and the matter effect parameter AsA_s. We are able to successfully fit all three data sets, including the MiniBooNE low energy excess, with the following best-fit model parameters: Δm2=0.47\Delta m^2=0.47 eV2^2, sin22θμe=0.010\sin^22\theta_{\mu e}=0.010, and As=2.0×1010A_s=2.0\times10^{-10} eV. The χ2\chi^2-probability for the best fit corresponds to 21.6%, to be compared to 6.8% for a fit where AsA_s has been set to zero, corresponding to a (3+1) sterile neutrino oscillation model. We find that the compatibility between the three data sets corresponds to 17.4%, to be compared to 2.3% for As=0A_s=0. Finally, given the fit results, we examine consequences for reactor, solar, and atmospheric oscillations. For this paper, the presented model is empirically driven, but the results obtained can be directly used to investigate various phenomenological interpretations such as non-standard matter effects.Comment: 19 pages, 11 figures, 1 tabl
    corecore