Difference in differences results comparing ‘before and during’ vs ‘after’ periods of YiL for practices that scored 2–4 vs those who scored 0–1.

<p>Difference in differences results comparing ‘before and during’ vs ‘after’ periods of YiL for practices that scored 2–4 vs those who scored 0–1.</p

Practice participation in YiL: distribution of scores by borough.

<p>Number of interventions each practice undertook. Measured by: evidence of attendance by practice staff at YiL educational events (Spirometry training, Nurse Mentorship programme, Master Classes) or whether e-template for COPD was uploaded on practice computer.</p

Mixed methods design to address evaluation objectives.

<p>Mixed methods design to address evaluation objectives.</p

YiL implementation timeline, evaluation periods and programme theories (early and evolved).

<p>Triangles = programme events or blocks of activity (hollow = preparatory, solid = during the programme), crosses = contextual events. </p

Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals for YiL boroughs versus comparators in each time period.

<p>Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals for YiL boroughs versus comparators in each time period.</p

Diagram of files included in final analysis.

<p>Diagram of files included in final analysis.</p

Efficacy in monitoring change of two client rating scales used to assess counselling outcome.

<p>Histogram shows difference in the changes in the complaint and functioning rating scales. Rating scale difference is defined as (complaint rating at client’s last visit–complaint rating at the first visit)–(functioning rating at the client’s last visit–functioning rating at the first visit).</p

Associations of the individual rating scales and independent variables.

<p>Associations of the individual rating scales and independent variables.</p

Association of the more favourable counsellor-assessed outcomes with larger improvements in the client rating scales.

<p>Box-plot shows the distribution of change in rating scales (complaint, functioning) for each status (increased, same, improved, resolved) at client’s last visit as assessed by the counsellor (n = 6,988).</p

Additional file 1: of Seroprevalence and risk factors of recent infection with hepatitis E virus during an acute outbreak in an urban setting in Chad, 2017

(French version). Questionnaire household and individual French. Household and individual questionnaires used during the HEV seroprevalence survey in Am Timan (Chad), 2017. (DOCX 56 kb