24 research outputs found

    Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications

    No full text
    Background: The news media are an important source of information about new medical treatments, but there is concern that some coverage may be inaccurate and overly enthusiastic. Methods: We studied coverage by U.S. news media of the benefits and risks of three medications that are used to prevent major diseases. The medications were pravastatin, a cholesterol-lowering drug for the prevention of cardiovascular disease; alendronate, a bisphosphonate for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis; and aspirin, which is used for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. We analyzed a systematic probability sample of 180 newspaper articles (60 for each drug) and 27 television reports that appeared between 1994 and 1998. Results: Of the 207 stories, 83 (40 percent) did not report benefits quantitatively. Of the 124 that did, 103 (83 percent) reported relative benefits only, 3 (2 percent) absolute benefits only, and 18 (15 percent) both absolute and relative benefits. Of the 207 stories, 98 (47 percent) mentioned potential harm to patients, and only 63 (30 percent) mentioned costs. Of the 170 stories citing an expert or a scientific study, 85 (50 percent) cited at least one expert or study with a financial tie to a manufacturer of the drug that had been disclosed in the scientific literature. These ties were disclosed in only 33 (39 percent) of the 85 stories. Conclusions: News-media stories about medications may include inadequate or incomplete information about the benefits, risks, and costs of the drugs as well as the financial ties between study groups or experts and pharmaceutical manufacturers

    Lipid Management in Youth: What Are the Screening and Treatment Trends Within the Pediatric Cardiovascular Research Network?

    No full text
    Background/Aims: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) accounts for 1 in every 3 deaths in the United States, and studies show that the precursors of atherosclerosis are apparent early in life. The correlation between childhood cardiovascular risk factors and the extent of atherosclerosis in adulthood has led to the development of guidelines aimed at attenuating ASCVD risks in youth. One major ASCVD risk factor is dyslipidemia, including both familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and lifestyle-related hyperlipidemia. Currently, few studies have investigated temporal lipid screening and treatment trends in youth and guideline adherence before and after the 2011 update, which includes universal lipid screening and targeted screening recommendations. The purpose of this study is to identify lipid screening and treatment trends and guideline adherence in a diverse population of children and adolescents across multiple health care systems participating in the Pediatric Cardiovascular Risk Network (P-CVRN) study. This data is also essential to provide up-to-date cost-effective analyses (CEA). Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. This retrospective database study includes \u3e 600,000 youth age 2 to 21 years with at least one outpatient visit captured across five P-CVRN sites between 2001 and 2013. The following de-identified data was captured and extracted at an individual patient level from inpatient and outpatient claims data: patient demographics, diagnoses, pretreatment laboratory values, initial lipid-lowering medications and doses, initial posttreatment laboratory values and presence of other risk factors or conditions. Results: The data collected was used to analyze trends in pediatric lipid management and inform contemporaneous CEA related to pediatric lipid screening and treatment. Our data revealed that screening rates declined at most sites and varied from a peak of ~25% to a low of ~5% of youth. Lipid-lowering medications were prescribed in 0.02–0.19% of all youth, and prescribing did not generally increase over time. Lipid-lowering medication and dose initiation, pre- and posttreatment laboratory values, and medication possession ratio were analyzed using logistic regression. CEA did not support the benefit of universal lipid screening in youth. Discussion: Current screening trends indicate that health care providers are nonadherent with guideline recommendations, and CEA reveals that universal screening in youth is not cost-effective
    corecore