Ibrutinib in association with venetoclax for the treatment of mantle-cell lymphoma: a multicenter case series

Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease after intensive chemotherapy have few effective treatment options. Ibrutinib showed a promising median progression-free survival (PFS) with manageable toxicity. The BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax showed encouraging results in R/R MCL patients and preclinical models suggest a potential synergistic effect of dual BTK and BCL2 inhibition. Ibrutinib in association with venetoclax was successfully investigated in a phase II trial

An increase in myocardial 18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake is associated with left ventricular ejection fraction decline in Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with anthracycline

Abstract Background Doxorubicin (DOX)-based chemotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) yields excellent disease-free survival, but poses a substantial risk of subsequent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure, typically with delayed onset. At the cellular level, this cardiotoxicity includes deranged cardiac glucose metabolism. Methods By reviewing the hospital records from January 2008 through December 2016, we selected HL patients meeting the following criteria: ≥ 18 year-old; first-line DOX-containing chemotherapy; no diabetes and apparent cardiovascular disease; 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) scans before treatment (PETSTAGING), after 2 cycles (PETINTERIM) and at the end of treatment (PETEOT); at least one echocardiography ≥ 6 months after chemotherapy completion (ECHOPOST). We then evaluated the changes in LV 18FDG standardized uptake values (SUV) during the course of DOX therapy, and the relationship between LV-SUV and LV ejection fraction (LVEF), as calculated from the LV diameters in the echocardiography reports with the Teicholz formula. Results Forty-three patients (35 ± 13 year-old, 58% males) were included in the study, with 26 (60%) also having a baseline echocardiography available (ECHOPRE). LV-SUV gradually increased from PETSTAGING (log-transformed mean 0.20 ± 0.27) to PETINTERIM (0.27 ± 0.35) to PETEOT (0.30 ± 0.41; P for trend < 0.001). ECHOPOST was performed 22 ± 17 months after DOX chemotherapy. Mean LVEF was normal (68.8 ± 10.3%) and only three subjects (7%) faced a drop below the upper normal limit of 53%. However, when patients were categorized by median LV-SUV, LVEF at ECHOPOST resulted significantly lower in those with LV-SUV above than below the median value at both PETINTERIM (65.5 ± 11.8% vs. 71.9 ± 7.8%, P = 0.04) and PETEOT (65.6 ± 12.2% vs. 72.2 ± 7.0%, P = 0.04). This was also the case when only patients with ECHOPRE and ECHOPOST were considered (LVEF at ECHOPOST 64.7 ± 8.9% vs. 73.4 ± 7.6%, P = 0.01 and 64.6 ± 9.3% vs. 73.5 ± 7.0%, P = 0.01 for those with LV-SUV above vs. below the median at PETINTERIM and PETEOT, respectively). Furthermore, the difference between LVEF at ECHOPRE and ECHOPOST was inversely correlated with LV-SUV at PETEOT (P < 0.01, R2 = − 0.30). Conclusions DOX-containing chemotherapy causes an increase in cardiac 18FDG uptake, which is associated with a decline in LVEF. Future studies are warranted to understand the molecular basis and the potential clinical implications of this observation

Rituximab-dose-dense chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation in high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL04): final results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

Background The prognosis of young patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at high risk (age-adjusted International Prognostic Index [aa-IPI] score 2 or 3) treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone) is poor. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible benefit of intensification with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation as part of first-line treatment in these patients. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial with a 2 \uc3\u97 2 factorial design to compare, at two different R-CHOP dose levels, a full course of rituximab-dose-dense chemotherapy (no transplantation group) versus an abbreviated course of rituximab-dose-dense chemotherapy followed by consolidation with R-MAD (rituximab plus high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone plus dexamethasone) and high-dose BEAM chemotherapy (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (transplantation group) in young patients (18\ue2\u80\u9365 years) with untreated high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (aa-IPI score 2\ue2\u80\u933). At enrolment, patients were stratified according to aa-IPI score and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive R-CHOP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and vincristine 1\uc2\ub74 mg/m2on day 1, plus oral prednisone 100 mg on days 1\ue2\u80\u935) delivered in a 14-day cycle (R-CHOP-14) for eight cycles; high-dose R-CHOP-14 (R-MegaCHOP-14; R-CHOP-14 except for cyclophosphamide 1200 mg/m2and doxorubicin 70 mg/m2) for six cycles; R-CHOP-14 for four cycles followed by R-MAD (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2on day 1 or 4 plus intravenous cytarabine 2000 mg/m2and dexamethasone 4 mg/m2every 12 h on days 1\ue2\u80\u933 plus intravenous mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2on days 1\ue2\u80\u933) plus BEAM (intravenous carmustine 300 mg/m2on day \ue2\u88\u927, intravenous cytarabine 200 mg/m2twice a day on days \ue2\u88\u926 to \ue2\u88\u923, intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m2twice a day on days \ue2\u88\u926 to \ue2\u88\u923, plus intravenous melphalan 140 mg/m2on day \ue2\u88\u922) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (day 0); or R-MegaCHOP-14 for four cycles followed by R-MAD plus BEAM and autologous stem-cell transplantation. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival at 2 years in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with EudraCT (2005-002181-14; 2007-000275-42) and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00499018. Findings Between Jan 10, 2006, and Sept 8, 2010, 399 patients were randomly assigned to receive transplantation (n=199) or no transplantation (n=200); 203 patients were assigned to receive R-CHOP-14 and 196 were assigned to receive R-MegaCHOP-14. With a median follow-up of 72 months (IQR 57\ue2\u80\u9388), 2-year failure-free survival was 71% (95% CI 64\ue2\u80\u9377) in the transplantation group versus 62% (95% CI 55\ue2\u80\u9368) in the no transplantation group (hazard ratio [HR] 0\uc2\ub765 [95% CI 0\uc2\ub747\ue2\u80\u930\uc2\ub791]; stratified log-rank test p=0\uc2\ub7012). No difference in 5-year overall survival was observed between these groups (78% [95% CI 71\ue2\u80\u9383] versus 77% [71\ue2\u80\u9383]; HR 0\uc2\ub798 [0\uc2\ub765\ue2\u80\u931\uc2\ub748]; stratified log-rank test p=0\uc2\ub791). Grade 3 or worse haematological adverse events were reported in 183 (92%) of 199 patients in the transplantation group versus 135 (68%) of 200 patients in the no transplantation group. Grade 3 or worse non-haematological adverse events were reported in 90 (45%) versus 31 (16%); the most common grade 3 or worse non-haematological adverse event was gastrointestinal (49 [25%] vs 19 [10%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in 13 (3%) patients; eight in the transplantation group and five in the no transplantation group. Interpretation Abbreviated rituximab-dose-dense chemotherapy plus R-MAD plus BEAM and autologous stem-cell transplantation reduced the risk of treatment failure compared with full course rituximab-dose-dense chemotherapy in young patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at high risk. However, these results might not be clinically meaningful, since this improvement did not reflect an improvement in overall survival. These results do not support further consideration of the use of intensification of R-CHOP as an upfront strategy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with poor prognosis. Funding Fondazione Italiana Linfomi