Excess mortality in US Veterans during the COVID-19 pandemic: an individual-level cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Most analyses of excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic have employed aggregate data. Individual-level data from the largest integrated healthcare system in the US may enhance understanding of excess mortality. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study following patients receiving care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) between 1 March 2018 and 28 February 2022. We estimated excess mortality on an absolute scale (i.e. excess mortality rates, number of excess deaths) and a relative scale by measuring the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality comparing pandemic and pre-pandemic periods, overall and within demographic and clinical subgroups. Comorbidity burden and frailty were measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Veterans Aging Cohort Study Index, respectively. RESULTS: Of 5 905 747 patients, the median age was 65.8 years and 91% were men. Overall, the excess mortality rate was 10.0 deaths/1000 person-years (PY), with a total of 103 164 excess deaths and pandemic HR of 1.25 (95% CI 1.25-1.26). Excess mortality rates were highest among the most frail patients (52.0/1000 PY) and those with the highest comorbidity burden (16.3/1000 PY). However, the largest relative mortality increases were observed among the least frail (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.30-1.32) and those with the lowest comorbidity burden (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.43-1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Individual-level data offered crucial clinical and operational insights into US excess mortality patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Notable differences emerged among clinical risk groups, emphasizing the need for reporting excess mortality in both absolute and relative terms to inform resource allocation in future outbreaks

Management of a patient with Turner syndrome presenting with an isolated left subclavian artery aneurysm

We describe a case of a 52-year-old female with Turner syndrome found to have an isolated 3.5-cm left subclavian artery aneurysm. Surgical intervention was performed to decrease the risk of compressive symptoms, distal embolization, and rupture. This entailed exclusion of the aneurysm proximally using thoracic stent graft, carotid-subclavian bypass, and ligation of the subclavian artery distal to the aneurysm. One-year follow-up demonstrated exclusion of the aneurysm with a 5-mm reduction in maximum aneurysm sac diameter. This case represents the management of a rare isolated left subclavian artery aneurysm, in the setting of Turner syndrome, treated with a successful endovascular approach

Selective Use of Anticoagulation or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Extra-Anatomic Bypasses.

OBJECTIVES: The benefit of long-term anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with extra-anatomic bypasses to the lower extremity remains poorly defined. Our study analyzed the real-world use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with extra-anatomic bypass grafts to the lower extremity and compared graft and patient outcomes by antithrombotic regimen. METHODS: We studied patients who underwent axillo-femoral or femoral-femoral bypass within the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) with one-year follow-up data. Primary exposures were anticoagulation and DAPT, at the time of index procedure and one-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were major adverse limb events (MALE) defined as reintervention or above-ankle amputation, and primary patency. Secondary outcomes included perioperative blood transfusion requirements and the need for reoperation specifically for bleeding. We analyzed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier estimation and examined factors associated with choice of antithrombotic therapy via logistic regression. RESULTS: Our cohort included 2,760 patients (axillo-femoral bypass n=857, femoral-femoral bypass n=1,903) across 168 centers from 2009-2018. Mean age was 66.5 ±10.5 years and 59% were male. Patients were infrequently prescribed long-term anticoagulation (19%) or DAPT (22%). One-year primary patency was 86% and was similar by anticoagulation (log-rank p=0.12) and DAPT status (log-rank p=0.26). Freedom from MALE was 87% at 1 year and was slightly inferior for patients on anticoagulation (88% versus 83%, log-rank p=0.001) but was similar by DAPT (log-rank p=0.19). Transfusion was more common in patients who were anticoagulated compared to not (30% vs. 25%, p\u3c 0.01), but there was no increase in reoperation due to bleeding (anticoagulation 0.8 vs. 0.8, p=0.98). Anticoagulation was more commonly prescribed according to disease severity, such as rest pain (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.6 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-2.20), tissue loss (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.28-2.73), or acute limb ischemia (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.35-2.71) or prior bypass graft (OR: 2.6, CI: 2.07-3.35). Patients were more commonly prescribed DAPT according to comorbidities, including hypertension (OR: 1.4, CI: 1.04-1.94) and coronary artery disease (OR: 1.6, CI 1.26-1.95). CONCLUSION: Antithrombotics are selectively employed in patients with extra-anatomic bypass to the lower extremity, the selection of which appears associated with disease severity for anticoagulants and patient comorbidities for DAPT. Primary patency and MALE rates are similar with focused utilization of anticoagulants or DAPT. Blood transfusions are more common among patients on antithrombotics without a difference in the need for reoperation for bleeding

Durable Results with In Situ Graft Repair of Ruptured Salmonella Aneurysm in a Patient with Autoimmune Deficiency Syndrome

We describe a case of a 42-year-old male patient with advanced autoimmune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) (CD4 count of 16 cells/mm) found to have a ruptured infected infrarenal aortic aneurysm. Emergent in situ repair was performed with a Hemashield Dacron graft (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA). Aortic tissue cultures grew group DSalmonella. Patient was placed initially on intravenous ciprofloxacin followed by lifelong oral levofloxacin and trimethoprim. Over 2 years following repair, he remains asymptomatic, with repair intact and no recurrent infection. This case is the first reported successful long-term repair of a ruptured salmonella infected abdominal aortic aneurysm in the setting of advanced AIDS

Procedural Safety Comparison Between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Carotid Endarterectomy, and Carotid Stenting: Perioperative and 1‐Year Rates of Stroke or Death

Background Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015 for patients with carotid artery stenosis. However, no randomized trial to evaluate TCAR has been performed to date, and previous reports have important limitations. Accordingly, we measured stroke or death after TCAR compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF‐CAS). Methods and Results We used the Vascular Quality Initiative registry to study patients who underwent TCAR, CEA, or TF‐CAS from September 2016 to June 2021. Our primary outcomes were perioperative and 1‐year stroke or death. We used logistic regression for risk adjustment for perioperative outcomes and Cox regression for risk adjustment for 1‐year outcomes. We used a 2‐stage residual inclusion instrumental variable (IV) method to adjust for selection bias and other unmeasured confounding. Our instrument was a center's preference to perform TCAR versus CEA or TF‐CAS. We performed a subgroup analysis stratified by presenting neurologic symptoms. We studied 21 234 patients who underwent TCAR, 82 737 who underwent CEA, and 14 595 who underwent TF‐CAS across 662 centers. The perioperative rate of stroke or death was 2.0% for TCAR, 1.7% for CEA, and 3.7% for TF‐CAS (P<0.001). Compared with TCAR, the IV‐adjusted odds ratio of perioperative stroke or death for CEA was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.55–0.99) and for TF‐CAS was 1.66 (95% CI, 0.99–2.79). Results were similar among both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The 1‐year rate of stroke or death was 6.4% for TCAR, 5.2% for CEA, and 9.7% for TF‐CAS (P<0.001). Compared with TCAR, the IV‐adjusted hazard ratio of 1 year stroke or death for CEA was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.80–1.17), and for TF‐CAS was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.04–2.02). IV analysis further demonstrated that symptomatic patients with carotid stenosis had the lowest 1‐year likelihood of stroke or death with TCAR (compared with TCAR, symptomatic IV‐adjusted hazard ratio for CEA: 1.30 [95% CI, 1.04–1.64], and TF‐CAS: 1.86 [95% CI, 1.27–2.71]). Conclusions Perioperative stroke or death was greater following TCAR when compared with CEA. However, at 1 year there was no statistically significant difference in stroke or death between the 2 procedures. TCAR performed favorably compared with TF‐CAS at both time points. Although CEA remains the gold standard procedure for patients with carotid stenosis, TCAR appears to be a safe alternative to CEA and TF‐CAS when used selectively and may be useful when treating symptomatic patients