Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care (HATRICC): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study of Operating Room to Intensive Care Unit Handoffs

Background: Operating room to intensive care unit handoffs are high-risk events for critically ill patients. Studies in selected patient populations show that standardizing operating room to intensive care unit handoffs improves information exchange and decreases errors. To adapt these findings to mixed surgical populations, we propose to study the implementation of a standardized operating room to intensive care unit handoff process in two intensive care units currently without an existing standard process. Methods/Design: The Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care (HATRICC) study is a hybrid effectiveness- implementation trial of operating room to intensive care unit handoffs. We will use mixed methods to conduct a needs assessment of the current handoff process, adapt published handoff processes, and implement a new standardized handoff process in two academic intensive care units. Needs assessment: We will use non-participant observation to observe the current handoff process. Focus groups, interviews, and surveys of clinicians will elicit participants’ impressions about the current process. Adaptation and implementation: We will adapt published standardized handoff processes using the needs assessment findings. We will use small group simulation to test the new process’ feasibility. After simulation, we will incorporate the new handoff process into the clinical work of all providers in the study units. Evaluation: Using the same methods employed in the needs assessment phase, we will evaluate use of the new handoff process. Data analysis: The primary effectiveness outcome is the number of information omissions per handoff episode as compared to the pre-intervention period. Additional intervention outcomes include patient intensive care unit length of stay and intensive care unit mortality. The primary implementation outcome is acceptability of the new process. Additional implementation outcomes include feasibility, fidelity and sustainability. Discussion: The HATRICC study will examine the effectiveness and implementation of a standardized operating room to intensive care unit handoff process. Findings from this study have the potential to improve healthcare communication and outcomes for critically ill patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02267174. Date of registration October 16, 2014

Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Competency Based Education

Abstract The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block is underutilized as an intervention for treatment of craniofacial pain at the National Institute of Health (NIH) in Maryland. This project aimed to increase knowledge and competence of anesthesia providers by implementing a comprehensive educational seminar on the SPG block to answer the question “in anesthesia providers at the NIH, does an educational intervention improve knowledge on the SPG block immediately after the training and two months later compared with the pre-intervention period?” Both a theoretical framework, Miller’s Pyramid of Clinical Competence, and a conceptual framework, Train the Trainer, provided guidance for the development of the clinical educational program. A two-part educational seminar including an online module and in-person hands on simulation training was conducted between January to May 2021. Percentage scores from pre-test, post-test, two-month post-test questionnaires, and simulation evaluation were used to assess knowledge improvement, retention, and competency, respectively. Secondary measures included role, perceived knowledge and comfort level of SPG block administration. Results supported a significant difference between pre-test and post-test knowledge scores and between pre-test and two-month post-test (p=0.002), but no significant difference between post-test and the two-month post-test intervention (p=0.024). This indicated that there was an increase in knowledge following the intervention as well as knowledge retention. Furthermore, anesthesia providers demonstrated competency following simulation-based training. A didactic and simulation-based approach to education on the SPG block effectively provides both knowledge and competency. Keywords: sphenopalatine ganglion block, simulation, competency-based education, craniofacial pai

Herniation of an abdominal antireflux fundoplication into the chest: what does it mean?

OBJECTIVES: The specific contribution of the herniation of an abdominal antireflux fundoplication into the chest to symptomatic and therefore surgical failure remains unclear. METHODS: The study was conducted in 189 consecutive fundoplication patients, categorized as patients reoperated on for chest herniation of either an abdominal 360° (Group 1; n = 95) or a partial (Group 2; n = 10) fundoplication, and patients having undergone an intrathoracic 360° fundoplication for short oesophagus (Group 3; n = 84; reference group). There were four subgroups in Group 1: 1A: wrap still complete and perioesophageal; 1B: wrap still complete but perigastric; 1C: wrap still perioesophageal but partially disrupted and 1D: wrap perigastric and partially disrupted. RESULTS: The prevalence of defective symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in Group 3 (0.0%) and Subgroup 1A (3.7%) than in Subgroups 1B (84.4%), 1C (86.7%) and 1D (100%) and Group 2 (100%). The prevalence of obstructive symptoms (dysphagia, chest pain, necrosis and perforation) was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in Subgroup 1A (100%) than in Subgroups 1B (57.8%), 1C (60.0%) and 1D (25.0%). The prevalence of a short oesophagus, an abdominal wall hernia repair and high abdominal pressure episodes in reoperated patients were 13.7, 36.2 and 67.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike perigastric or partial fundoplication, a 360° perioesophageal abdominal fundoplication, when herniated into the chest, is still effective against reflux. Obstructive symptoms are due to either diaphragmatic strangulation or perigastric migration of the wrap (slipknot effect). Short oesophagus, weakness of the abdominal wall and high abdominal pressure episodes favour the herniation process

Suspected acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as an outcome measure in clinical trials

Background: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has become an important outcome measure in clinical trials. This study aimed to explore the concept of suspected acute exacerbation as an outcome measure.Methods: Three investigators retrospectively reviewed subjects enrolled in the Sildenafil Trial of Exercise Performance in IPF who experienced a respiratory serious adverse event during the course of the study. Events were classified as definite acute exacerbation, suspected acute exacerbation, or other, according to established criteria.Results: Thirty-five events were identified. Four were classified as definite acute exacerbation, fourteen as suspected acute exacerbation, and seventeen as other. Definite and suspected acute exacerbations were clinically indistinguishable. Both were most common in the winter and spring months and were associated with a high risk of disease progression and short-term mortality.Conclusions: In this study one half of respiratory serious adverse events were attributed to definite or suspected acute exacerbations. Suspected acute exacerbations are clinically indistinguishable from definite acute exacerbations and represent clinically meaningful events. Clinical trialists should consider capturing both definite and suspected acute exacerbations as outcome measures. © 2013 Collard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd

Suspected acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as an outcome measure in clinical trials

Background: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has become an important outcome measure in clinical trials. This study aimed to explore the concept of suspected acute exacerbation as an outcome measure.Methods: Three investigators retrospectively reviewed subjects enrolled in the Sildenafil Trial of Exercise Performance in IPF who experienced a respiratory serious adverse event during the course of the study. Events were classified as definite acute exacerbation, suspected acute exacerbation, or other, according to established criteria.Results: Thirty-five events were identified. Four were classified as definite acute exacerbation, fourteen as suspected acute exacerbation, and seventeen as other. Definite and suspected acute exacerbations were clinically indistinguishable. Both were most common in the winter and spring months and were associated with a high risk of disease progression and short-term mortality.Conclusions: In this study one half of respiratory serious adverse events were attributed to definite or suspected acute exacerbations. Suspected acute exacerbations are clinically indistinguishable from definite acute exacerbations and represent clinically meaningful events. Clinical trialists should consider capturing both definite and suspected acute exacerbations as outcome measures. © 2013 Collard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd