31 research outputs found
Mediator Condensates Localize Signaling Factors to Key Cell Identity Genes
The gene expression programs that define the identity of each cell are controlled by master transcription factors (TFs) that bind cell-type-specific enhancers, as well as signaling factors, which bring extracellular stimuli to these enhancers. Recent studies have revealed that master TFs form phase-separated condensates with the Mediator coactivator at super-enhancers. Here, we present evidence that signaling factors for the WNT, TGF-ÎČ, and JAK/STAT pathways use their intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) to enter and concentrate in Mediator condensates at super-enhancers. We show that the WNT coactivator ÎČ-catenin interacts both with components of condensates and DNA-binding factors to selectively occupy super-enhancer-associated genes. We propose that the cell-type specificity of the response to signaling is mediated in part by the IDRs of the signaling factors, which cause these factors to partition into condensates established by the master TFs and Mediator at genes with prominent roles in cell identity
Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control
Super-enhancers (SEs) are clusters of enhancers that cooperatively assemble a high density of the transcriptional apparatus to drive robust expression of genes with prominent roles in cell identity. Here we demonstrate that the SE-enriched transcriptional coactivators BRD4 and MED1 form nuclear puncta at SEs that exhibit properties of liquid-like condensates and are disrupted by chemicals that perturb condensates. The intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of BRD4 and MED1 can form phase-separated droplets, and MED1-IDR droplets can compartmentalize and concentrate the transcription apparatus from nuclear extracts. These results support the idea that coactivators form phase-separated condensates at SEs that compartmentalize and concentrate the transcription apparatus, suggest a role for coactivator IDRs in this process, and offer insights into mechanisms involved in the control of key cell-identity genes
Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Ubiquitous molecular substrates for associative learning and activity-dependent neuronal facilitation.
Recent evidence suggests that many of the molecular cascades and substrates that contribute to learning-related forms of neuronal plasticity may be conserved across ostensibly disparate model systems. Notably, the facilitation of neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission that contribute to associative learning in Aplysia and Hermissenda, as well as associative LTP in hippocampal CA1 cells, all require (or are enhanced by) the convergence of a transient elevation in intracellular Ca2+ with transmitter binding to metabotropic cell-surface receptors. This temporal convergence of Ca2+ and G-protein-stimulated second-messenger cascades synergistically stimulates several classes of serine/threonine protein kinases, which in turn modulate receptor function or cell excitability through the phosphorylation of ion channels. We present a summary of the biophysical and molecular constituents of neuronal and synaptic facilitation in each of these three model systems. Although specific components of the underlying molecular cascades differ across these three systems, fundamental aspects of these cascades are widely conserved, leading to the conclusion that the conceptual semblance of these superficially disparate systems is far greater than is generally acknowledged. We suggest that the elucidation of mechanistic similarities between different systems will ultimately fulfill the goal of the model systems approach, that is, the description of critical and ubiquitous features of neuronal and synaptic events that contribute to memory induction
Biomolecular Condensates in Transcriptional Regulation
Transcriptional regulation of gene expression is fundamental in determining cell behavior, identity, and organism development. When dysregulated it can cause disease. Core to transcriptional regulation is the control of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) activity. The combined activity of DNA regulatory elements, transcription factors and cofactors, and epigenetic chromatin states determine where and when RNAPII transcribes â and thus regulates transcriptional activity. The highly cooperative interactions between components that positively and negatively regulate transcription have been mysterious for decades. However, recent study of biomolecular condensates has reframed our understanding of these cooperative interactions. Condensates are membrane-less compartments that concentrate components involved in the same biochemical processes. This thesis examines the formation and function of condensates that both activate and repress transcription. Transcriptional condensates form at active euchromatic genes to facilitate transcription (Sabari et al., 2018). In contrast, heterochromatin condensates form at transcriptionally silent regions of the genome to repress transcription (Li et al., 2020). Studies presented in this thesis demonstrate that transcriptional and heterochromatin condensates regulate gene expression via the concentration of specific components. Notably, we find that methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) is a key component of heterochromatin condensates. Mutations in MeCP2 cause the neurodevelopmental disorder Rett syndrome, and we link disease-causing mutations in MeCP2 to the disruption of heterochromatin condensate formation and function. These findings implicate condensate disruption in human disease. Our new understanding of condensates demands the development of new therapeutic hypotheses that must be explored in order to improve the lives of patients.Ph.D
Recommended from our members
Antisense lncRNA Transcription Mediates DNA Demethylation to Drive Stochastic Protocadherin α Promoter Choice
Stochastic activation of clustered Protocadherin (Pcdh) α, ÎČ, and Îł genes generates a cell-surface identity code in individual neurons that functions in neural circuit assembly. Here, we show that Pcdhα gene choice involves the activation of an antisense promoter located in the first exon of each Pcdhα alternate gene. Transcription of an antisense long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) from this antisense promoter extends through the sense promoter, leading to DNA demethylation of the CTCF binding sites proximal to each promoter. Demethylation-dependent CTCF binding to both promoters facilitates cohesin-mediated DNA looping with a distal enhancer (HS5-1), locking in the transcriptional state of the chosen Pcdhα gene. Uncoupling DNA demethylation from antisense transcription by Tet3 overexpression in mouse olfactory neurons promotes CTCF binding to all Pcdhα promoters, resulting in proximity-biased DNA looping of the HS5-1 enhancer. Thus, antisense transcription-mediated promoter demethylation functions as a mechanism for distance-independent enhancer/promoter DNA looping to ensure stochastic Pcdhα promoter choice
Enhancer Features that Drive Formation of Transcriptional Condensates
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Enhancers are DNA elements that are bound by transcription factors (TFs), which recruit coactivators and the transcriptional machinery to genes. Phase-separated condensates of TFs and coactivators have been implicated in assembling the transcription machinery at particular enhancers, yet the role of DNA sequence in this process has not been explored. We show that DNA sequences encoding TF binding site number, density, and affinity above sharply defined thresholds drive condensation of TFs and coactivators. A combination of specific structured (TF-DNA) and weak multivalent (TF-coactivator) interactions allows for condensates to form at particular genomic loci determined by the DNA sequence and the complement of expressed TFs. DNA features found to drive condensation promote enhancer activity and transcription in cells. Our study provides a framework to understand how the genome can scaffold transcriptional condensates at specific loci and how the universal phenomenon of phase separation might regulate this process. Shrinivas et al. demonstrate that specific types of motif compositions encoded in DNA drive localized formation of transcriptional condensates. These findings explain how phase separation can occur at specific genomic locations and shed light on why only some genomic loci become highly active enhancers