2 research outputs found

    How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables

    Get PDF
    Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) has unrealized potential as an alternative crop in many semiarid regions including central Argentina. Our objective was to relate how temperature and precipitation conditions with fall (5 June 2012 and 23 Apr. 2013) and winter sowing (13 Aug. 2012 and 20 Aug. 2013) affected phenology, yield, yield components, and oil percent in four winter and eight spring-type safflower accessions in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Fall sowing was associated with lower temperatures, higher precipitation, lower heat/moisture stress indices and precipitation deficits than winter sowing. Rosette period lasted 55 d longer, and stem elongation to anthesis period 30 d longer in fall than in winter sowing. However, anthesis was advanced only few days in fall sowing and duration of postanthesis development was comparable between sowing regimes and years. Fall sowing plants averaged 3,252 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 109.8 g m–2, whereas winter sowing plants averaged 1,443 filled grains m–2 and a grain yield of 49.3 g m–2. Grain yield was 35% higher in winter than in spring-type accessions, but winter types had lower oil percent (22.0%) than spring-types (33.3%). In the semiarid region of central Argentina, we recommend fall sowing as it extended the growing season in terms of days preanthesis and presented favorable climatic conditions for safflower development.Fil: Franchini, MarĂ­a Clara. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de AgronomĂ­a; ArgentinaFil: Flemmer, Andrea Cecilia. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de AgronomĂ­a; ArgentinaFil: Lindström, Lilia Ivone. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de AgronomĂ­a; ArgentinaFil: Carrin, Maria Elena. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - BahĂ­a Blanca. Planta Piloto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica; ArgentinaFil: Constenla, Diana Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - BahĂ­a Blanca. Planta Piloto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Planta Piloto de IngenierĂ­a QuĂ­mica; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Johnson, Richard Coburn. Washington State University; Estados Unido
    corecore