4 research outputs found

    Improving kidney care for people with severe mental health difficulties: a thematic analysis of twenty-two healthcare providers’ perspectives

    Get PDF
    IntroductionPeople with severe mental health difficulties (SMHDs) and concurrent kidney disease have less access to quality kidney care and worse clinical outcomes. Our research investigates the barriers and facilitators to effective kidney care for people with SMHDs, and how care might be improved for this underserved population.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with twenty-two physical (n = 14) and mental (n = 8) healthcare professionals with experience working with people with SMHDs and concurrent kidney disease. Interview data were analysed and interpreted using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsFour themes were generated from the data: 1. “It’s about understanding their limitations and challenges, without limiting their rights” describes how some people with SMHDs need additional support when accessing kidney care due to challenges with their mental state, motivation, cognitive difficulties, or mistrust of the healthcare system. 2. “There are people falling through the cracks” describes how the separation of physical and mental healthcare, combined with under-resourcing and understaffing, results in poorer outcomes for people with SMHDs. 3. “Psychiatry is a black spot in our continuing medical education” describes how many renal healthcare providers have limited confidence in their understanding of mental health and their ability to provide care for people with SMHDs. 4. “When they present to a busy emergency department with a problem, the staff tend to go ‘
psych patient”” describes how stigma towards people with SMHDs can negatively impact quality of care.ConclusionHealthcare professionals accounts’ describe how people with SMHDs and kidney disease can have favourable outcomes if they have appropriate hospital, community and social supports. Findings indicate that effective management of kidney disease for people with SMHDs requires integrated physical and mental health care, which takes an individualised “whole person” approach to addressing the interaction between kidney disease and mental health

    Chronic kidney disease and severe mental illness: a scoping review

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: People who have severe mental illness experience higher rates of long-term conditions and die on average 15-20 years earlier than people who do not have severe mental illness, a phenomenon known as the mortality gap. Long-term conditions, such as diabetes, impact health outcomes for people who have severe mental illness, however there is limited recognition of the relationship between chronic kidney disease and severe mental illness. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review was to explore the available evidence on the relationship between chronic kidney disease and severe mental illness. METHODS: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched. The database searches were limited to articles published between January 2000-January 2022, due to significant progress that has been made in the detection, diagnosis and treatment of both SMI and CKD. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they explored the relationship between SMI and CKD (Stages 1-5) in terms of prevalence, risk factors, clinical outcomes, and access to treatment and services. Severe mental illness was defined as conditions that can present with psychosis, including schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and other psychotic disorders. Thirty articles were included in the review. RESULTS: The included studies illustrated that there is an increased risk of chronic kidney disease amongst people who have severe mental illness, compared to those who do not. However, people who have severe mental illness and chronic kidney disease are less likely to receive specialist nephrology care, are less likely to be evaluated for a transplant, and have higher rates of mortality. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there is a dearth of literature in this area, but the available literature suggests there are significant health inequalities in kidney care amongst people who have severe mental illness. Further research is needed to understand the factors that contribute to this relationship, and to develop strategies to improve both clinical outcomes and access to kidney care

    Non-motor features of cervical dystonia: Cognition, social cognition, psychological distress and quality of life

    No full text
    Introduction: Non-motor features of cervical dystonia (CD) have been identified, including depression, anxiety, and neuropsychological deficits. The aims were: to provide a clinical neuropsychological profile of CD patients with specific focus on social cognition; assess levels of psychological distress; and investigate the relationship between non-motor features of CD, including cognitive functioning, psychological distress, CD severity, pain, and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Methods: A multi-domain neuropsychological assessment battery was administered to 46 participants with CD, examining cognitive and social cognitive domains. Clinical data on dystonia severity, pain, psychological distress and HR-QoL were collected. Results: The majority of participants with CD performed within the average range across most tests of cognition. Scores were significantly lower than standardized norms in social cognition, processing speed, and aspects of memory. High levels of anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS-A] ≄ 11, 30%) and depression (HADS-D ≄ 11; 29%) were observed. Psychological distress, CD severity, pain and HR-QoL were not significantly associated with neuropsychological functioning after controlling for multiple comparisons. Low HR-QoL was associated with higher levels of pain and psychological distress, but not severity of motor symptoms. Conclusion: Results indicate that psychological distress and deficits in cognitive and social cognitive functioning are likely distinct features of CD. While motor symptoms do not appear to impact HR-QoL, pain and psychological distress were associated with low HR-QoL. Findings highlight the importance of addressing non-motor symptoms in the treatment of CD
    corecore