Comparison of Aerobic Training Methods on V02 Max, Body Composition and Anaerobic Power.

Recent research has utilized intensity as a primary means to define training methods for improving aerobic capacity (VO2 max). Alternative ways of classifying training techniques must be examined to elucidate optimal practices for aerobic capacity enhancement. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential impact of various aerobic training methods on V02, body composition and anaerobic power. METHODS: Thirty-four healthy male & female subjects (18-30yrs) participated in an equated volume supervised running workout for six weeks utilizing two alternate training methods. Group one (N = 17, 21 ± 3 yr) participated in Interval Training Distance (ITD) and group two (N = 17, 21 ± 3 yr) participated in Long Slow Distance (LSD). All subjects participated in a familiarity session (FAM), a Pre-Test (T1) and a Post-Test (T2) . Each testing session consisted of a V02 Max, a 30 second Wingate and body composition assessment. Data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Significance was set at p \u3c 0.05 and adopted throughout. RESULTS: The ITD and LSD groups experienced significant increases (p \u3c 0 .001) in VO2 max, with 9.05% (4.19 ± 4.15 ml/kg/min) and 3.18% (1.39 ± 3.67 ml/kg/min) increases respectively. A significant interaction (p \u3c 0.05) in VO2 max occurred between groups, as the ITD group displayed a 302% greater increase when compared to the LSD group. Body fat percentage significantly decreased (p \u3c 0.01) in the ITD (1.08 ± 1.90%) and LSD (1.55 ± 3.21%) groups, while a significant reduction (p \u3c 0.05) in total body weight was also observed. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that the ITD training method has a greater impact on aerobic capacity than LSD training method. However, both ITD and LSD training methods had a significant impact on aerobic capacity, body weight, and body composition

The Impact of Differing Types of Physical Activity on Weight Loss, Strength, VO2 max, and the Various Metabolic Hormones.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigate the impact of differing types of physical activity on weight loss, strength, VO2 max, and various metabolic hormones. METHODS: Eleven sedentary and overweight male/females participated in this study and were randomly assigned to one of two exercise groups: aerobic training (A) (N = 4, 40 ± 8.7 yrs 165 ± 8.3cm, 89 ± 16 kg), or aerobic training plus resistance training (ART) (N = 7, 43 ± 10 yrs, 171 ± 8.7 cm, 91 ± 12 kg). Training protocols for the two exercise groups consisted of 30 min of aerobic exercise five days per week at 60-70% of heart rate max and 30 minutes of aerobic exercise three days per week at 60-70% of heart rate max plus two days of moderate intensity resistance exercise per week for the (A) and (ART) groups, respectively. Baseline testing consisted of weight, hip, and waist measurements, and body composition analysis using bioelectrical impedance. Participants donated approximately 20 ml of fasting blood for the analysis of clinical chemistry profiles, WBC counts, and the hormones insulin, leptin, and cortisol. Following these assessments, VO2 max, upper-body strength, and lower-body strength was established using standard procedures. All baseline assessments were repeated at 4 and 8 weeks of the study. Statistical analyses utilized a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures for all criterion variables (p\u3c0.05). RESULTS: A significant (p \u3c 0.05) increase in upper and lower body strength was observed in both A and ART groups, however there was no significant difference between groups. A significant group x time interaction (p \u3c 0.05) was observed for body weight (ART: -1.5 ± 0.3 lbs; A: 3 ± 0.5 lbs). No significant (p \u3e 0.05) main effects for group or time were observed for the criterion variables body fat, VO2 max, and the hormones insulin, leptin, and cortisol. Furthermore, neither protocol had a significant impact on body fat or VO2 max. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that aerobic exercise coupled with resistance training for 8 weeks yielded greater results in weight loss than aerobic training alone. No marked changes were noted on the affects of any type of exercise regiment on body composition, VO2 max, or the hormones leptin, insulin, and cortisol over the 8-week study

The Effects of Pre- and Post-Exercise Whey vs. Casein Protein Consumption on Body Composition and Performance Measures in Collegiate Female Athletes

Two of the most popular forms of protein on the market are whey and casein. Both proteins are derived from milk however the two differ concerning their absorption in the body. This difference between whey and casein proteins could affect the response seen in conjunction with training. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential effects of two types of protein ingestion in conjunction with a controlled resistance training program utilizing college female basketball players. METHODS: 16 NCAA Division III female basketball players were matched according to weight and double-blind randomly assigned to consume 24 grams whey protein (WP) (N = 8, 20 ± 1.9 years, 158 ± 27.3 cm, 66 ± 4.9 kg, 27 ± 4.9 %BF) or 24 grams casein protein (CP) (N = 8, 21 ± 2.8 years, 153 ± 2.9 cm, 68 ± 2.9 kg, 25 ± 5.7 %BF) pre- and post-exercise for eight weeks. Subjects participated in a supervised 4-day per week undulating periodized training program. At 0, 4, and 8 weeks, subjects underwent DEXA body composition analysis. At 0 and 8 weeks subjects underwent 1RM strength, muscle endurance, vertical jump, 5-10-5 and broad jump testing sessions. Data analysis using repeated measures ANOVA are presented as mean ± SD changes from baseline after 60 days. RESULTS: No significant group x time interaction effects were observed among groups in changes in any variable (p \u3e 0.05). A significant time effect was observed for body fat (WP: -2 ± 1.1 %BF; CP: -1 ± 1.6 %BF, p \u3c 0.001), lean mass (WP: 1.5 ± 1 kg; CP: 1.4 ± 1 kg, p \u3c 0.001), fat mass (WP: -1.3 ± 1.2 kg; CP: -0.6 ± 1.4 kg, p \u3c 0.001), leg press 1RM (WP: 88.7 ± 43.9 kg; CP: 90 ± 48.5 kg, p \u3c 0.001), bench press 1RM (WP: 7.5 ± 4.6 kg; CP: 4.3 ±4.5 kg, p = 0.01), vertical jump (WP: 1.6 ± 0.74 in; CP: 1.4 ± 3 in, p \u3c 0.001), 5-10-5 (WP: -0.3 ± 0.2 sec; CP: -0.09 ± 0.42 sec, p \u3c 0.001), and broad jump (WP: 4.1 ± 2.6 in; CP: 5.1 ± 2.8 in, p \u3c 0.001). CONCLUSION: The combination of a controlled undulating resistance training program with pre- and post-exercise protein supplementation is capable of inducing significant changes in performance and body composition. There does not appear to be a difference in the performance enhancing effects of whey versus casein proteins

The Effects of an Energy Increasing Supplement on Markers of V02 max, Body Composition, and Anaerobic Power

Research suggests that energy increasing supplement ingestion prior to prolonged aerobic exercise (\u3e60minutes) can improve aerobic capacity (VO2 Max). Energy increasing supplements affect on reduced aerobic training periods (\u3c60\u3eminutes) lack definitive empirical evidence. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential impact of an energy increasing supplement on aerobic training, body composition and anaerobic power. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy male and female subjects (18-30yrs) participated in an equated volume supervised running workout for six weeks utilizing long slow distance. Group one (N = 17, 21 ± 3 yr) participated in long slow distance training as a Placebo group void of any dietary instructions or interventions. Group two (N = 16, 21 ± 3 yr) participated in long slow distance training and was provided with a GU Energy Gel packet and 8 oz. of water fifteen minutes prior to the workout. All subjects participated in a familiarity session (FAM), a Pre-Test (T1) and a Post-Test (T2). Each testing session consisted of a V02 Max, a 30 second Wingate and body composition assessment. Data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Significance was set at p \u3c 0.05 and adopted throughout. RESULTS: The GU and Placebo groups experienced significant increases (p \u3c 0.001), in VO2 max, with 9.71% (4.06 ± 2.68 ml/kg/min) and 2.81% (1.26 ± 2.25 ml/kg/min) increases respectively. A significant interaction (p \u3c 0.005) in VO2 max occurred between groups, as the GU group displayed a 322% greater increase when compared to the Placebo group. Body fat percentage significantly decreased (p \u3c 0.05) in the GU (0.76 ± 2.47%) and Placebo (1.55 ± 3.21%) groups without a significant reduction in total body weight at a p \u3c 0.05 significant level. No change was observed in Wingate peak or mean power (p \u3c 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest GU Energy Gel supplementation has a more profound impact on aerobic capacity when compared to a Placebo under identical training protocols. However, both GU Energy Gel and Placebo supplementation had a significant effect on aerobic capacity and body fat percentage

The effects of a commercially available botanical supplement on strength, body composition, power output, and hormonal profiles in resistance-trained males

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fenugreek (<it>Trigonella foenum-graecum</it>) is a leguminous, annual plant originating in India and North Africa. In recent years Fenugreek has been touted as an ergogenic aid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of Fenugreek supplementation on strength and body composition.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>49 Resistance trained men were matched according to body weight and randomly assigned to ingest in a double blind manner capsules containing 500 mg of a placebo (N = 23, 20 ± 1.9 years, 178 ± 6.3 cm, 85 ± 12.7 kg, 17 ± 5.6 %BF) or Fenugreek (N = 26, 21 ± 2.8 years, 178 ± 6 cm, 90 ± 18.2 kg, 19.3 ± 8.4 %BF). Subjects participated in a supervised 4-day per week periodized resistance-training program split into two upper and two lower extremity workouts per week for a total of 8-weeks. At 0, 4, and 8-weeks, subjects underwent hydrodensiometery body composition, 1-RM strength, muscle endurance, and anaerobic capacity testing. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and are presented as mean ± SD changes from baseline after 60-days.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>No significant differences (p > 0.05) between groups were noted for training volume. Significant group × time interaction effects were observed among groups in changes in body fat (FEN: -2.3 ± 1.4%BF; PL: -0.39 ± 1.6 %BF, p < 0.001), leg press 1-RM (FEN: 84.6 ± 36.2 kg; PL: 48 ± 29.5 kg, p < 0.001), and bench press 1-RM (FEN: 9.1 ± 6.9 kg; PL: 4.3 ± 5.6 kg, p = 0.01). No significant interactions was observed among groups for Wingate power analysis (p = 0.95) or muscular endurance on bench press (p = 0.87) or leg press (p = 0.61). In addition, there were no changes among groups in any clinical safety data including lipid panel, liver function, kidney function, and/or CBC panel (p > 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is concluded that 500 mg of this proprietary Fenugreek extraction had a significant impact on both upper- and lower-body strength and body composition in comparison to placebo in a double blind controlled trial. These changes were obtained with no clinical side effects.</p

EFFECTS OF A PROPRIETARY BLEND RICH IN GLYCOSIDE BASED STANDARDIZED FENUGREEK SEED EXTRACT (IBPR) ON INFLAMMATORY MARKERS DURING ACUTE ECCENTRIC RESISTANCE EXERCISE IN YOUNG SUBJECTS

  Objective: To assess the efficacy of a proprietary blend rich in glycoside based standardized fenugreek seed extract (400 mg) and minor quantities of curcumin and cinnamon (25 mg each) supplementation (IBPR) on inflammatory markers related to skeletal muscle soreness using double-blind placebo control, parallel design.Methods: A total of 20 healthy non-resistance trained young male and female subjects were assigned to ingest either IBPR or matching placebo for 14 days before the eccentric exercise bout. Subjects were instructed to perform 24 sets with 10 eccentric knee extensor repetitions (with one leg at 30°/s on an isokinetic device). Subjects had their blood drawn at baseline, immediately post, 1 hr, 3 hrs, and 24 hrs post-eccentric exercise. Efficacy in terms of serum levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-10 (IL-10), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1ra, IL-1b, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor) and safety in terms of kidney function (blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, BUN to creatinine ratio), and differential leukocyte count were measured. The data of each parameter were analyzed by two-way repeated measure ANOVA.Results: Significant time-dependent effects were observed in IL1b, IL6, and creatinine values from baseline whereas significant treatment dependent effect was seen in IL-1ra. IBPR was found to be safe and well tolerated.Conclusion: IBPR supplementation showed a significant anti-inflammatory efficacy on eccentric exercise-induced inflammatory markers of skeletal muscle soreness in non-resistance trained subjects

The Effects of a Proprietary Fenugreek Extract on Strength & Body Composition

Fenugreek extract has been marketed in dozens of dietary products as having performance enhancing potential for resistance trained athletes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential performance enhancing effects of a proprietary fenugreek extract in conjunction with a controlled resistance training program. METHODS: Thirty resistance trained male subjects were matched according to fat free mass and randomly assigned to ingest in a double-blind manner capsules containing 500mg of a placebo or fenugreek (Trigonella Foenun greacum) once per day for 8-weeks (Active: N = 17, 21 ± 2.8 yrs, 178 ± 5.8 cm, 85 ± 9.6 kg, 18.8 ± 4.8 BF%; Placebo: N = 13, 21 ± 3 yrs, 180 ± 6.4 cm, 84 ± 15 kg, 18.3 ± 6.8 BF%). Subjects were instructed to participate in a periodized 4-day per week resistance-training program split into two upper and two lower extremity workouts per week for a total of 8-weeks. Body composition was analyzed using hydrodensiometry and strength tests involved performing a one repetition max (1RM) on the isotonic bench press and leg press. Statistical analyses utilized a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures for all criterion variables (p \u3c 0.05). RESULTS: A significant (p \u3c 0.05) group x time interaction for body composition was observed indicating the Active (-1.8 ± 0.5 BF%) group decreased body fat percentage in comparison to Placebo (-0.05 ± 0.3 BF%) over the 8-week investigation period. In addition, there was a significant (p \u3c 0.05) main effect for time over the eight week period in lean muscle mass (Active: 2.4 ± 0.1 kg; Placebo: 1.0 ± 0.1 kg). No significant effects for group or time were observed for upper or lower body strength (p \u3e 0.05). CONCLUSION: In addition to a controlled resistance training program fenugreek had a significant impact on body composition in comparison to placebo. This study was funded by Indus Biotech