Zootherapeutics utilized by residents of the community Poço Dantas, Crato-CE, Brazil

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Animals have been used as a source of medicine in Brazil since ancient times, and have played a significant role in healing practices. Specifically in Northeast Brazil, zootherapy is a very common practice, and together with medicinal plants, it plays an important role as a therapeutic alternative. In the state of Ceara, no works have been carried out on rural communities with regard to use of zootherapeutics, even though the practice of zootherapy is common in this region. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the use of medicinal animals in a rural community (Poco Dantas) in the municipality of Crato, Ceara, Brazil.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The field survey was carried out from October 2008 to January 2009 by conducting interviews using structured questionnaires with 72 people (33 men and 39 women), who provided information on animal species used as remedies, body parts used to prepare the remedies, and ailments for which the remedies were prescribed. We calculated the informant consensus factor (ICF) to determine the consensus over which species are effective for particular ailments, as well as the species use value (UV) to determine the extent of utilization of each species.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 29 species, distributed in 17 families were categorized as having some medicinal property. The taxa most represented were: mammals (9), insects (7), reptiles and birds (4). <it>Progne chalybea</it>, a species not previously recorded as being of medicinal use, was cited in the present work, where it is utilized in the treatment of alcoholism. The animals are used in the treatment of 34 diseases or symptoms, where sore throat, inflammations and cough are the ailments with the greatest number of citations.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The data show that zootherapy represents an important therapeutic alternative for the inhabitants of the community. New studies on medicinal fauna should be conducted with the aim of determining the exploitation level of the species utilized, promoting sustainable development of medicinal species that are eventually threatened, and preserving and disseminating the knowledge developed by traditional individuals of the community.</p

Bivalve distribution in hydrographic regions in South America: historical overview and conservation

Based on literature review and malacological collections, 168 native freshwater bivalve and five invasive species have been recorded for 52 hydrographic regions in South America. The higher species richness has been detected in the South Atlantic, Uruguay, Paraguay, and Amazon Brazilian hydrographic regions. Presence or absence data were analysed by Principal Coordinate for PhylogenyWeighted. The lineage Veneroida was more representative in hydrographic regions that are poorer in species and located West of South America. The Mycetopodidae and Hyriidae lineages were predominant in regions that are richest in species toward the East of the continent. The distribution of invasive speciesLimnoperna fortuneiis not related to species richness in different hydrographic regions there. The species richness and its distribution patterns are closely associated with the geological history of the continent. The hydrographic regions present distinct phylogenetic and species composition regardless of the level of richness. Therefore, not only should the richness be considered to be a criterion for prioritizing areas for conservation, but also the phylogenetic diversity of communities engaged in services and functional aspects relevant to ecosystem maintenance. A plan to the management of this fauna according to particular ecological characteristics and human uses of hydrographic regions is neededFil: Pereira, Daniel . Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul; BrasilFil: Dreher Mansur, Maria Cristina . Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul; BrasilFil: Duarte, Leandro D. S. . Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul; BrasilFil: Schramm de Oliveira, Arthur . Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul; BrasilFil: Mansur Pimpao, Daniel . Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul; BrasilFil: Tasso Callil, Claudia . Universidade Federal Do Mato Grosso Do Sul; BrasilFil: Ituarte, Cristian Federico. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Parada, Esperanza . Plataforma de Investigación en Ecohidrología y Ecohidráulica (ECOHYD); ChileFil: Peredo, Santiago . Plataforma de Investigación en Ecohidrología y Ecohidráulica (ECOHYD); ChileFil: Darrigran, Gustavo Alberto. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Cs.naturales y Museo. Div.zoologia Invertebrados; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Scarabino, Fabrizio . Museo Nacional de Historia Natural; UruguayFil: Clavijo, Cristhian. Museo Nacional de Historia Natural; UruguayFil: Lara, Gladys . Universidad Católica de Temuco; ChileFil: Miyahira, Igor Christo . Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Raya Rodriguez, Maria Teresa . Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul; BrasilFil: Lasso, Carlos . Instituto de Investigacion de Recursos Biologicos Alexander von Humboldt; Colombi