34 research outputs found
Selective Photoinduced Ligand Exchange in a New Tris–Heteroleptic Ru(II) Complex
The
complex <i>cis</i>-[RuÂ(biq)Â(phen)Â(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>, biq = 2,2′-biquinoline,
phen = 1,10-phenathroline) displays selective photosubstitution of
only one CH<sub>3</sub>CN ligand with a solvent molecule upon irradiation
with low energy light (λ<sub>irr</sub> ≥ 550 nm), whereas
both ligands exchange with λ<sub>irr</sub> ≥ 420 nm.
In contrast, [RuÂ(phen)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>) and [RuÂ(biq)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>3</b>) exchange both CH<sub>3</sub>CN ligands
with similar rates upon irradiation with a broad range of wavelengths.
The photolysis of <b>1</b> in the presence of pyridine (py)
results in the formation of the intermediate <i>cis</i>-[RuÂ(biq)Â(phen)Â(py)Â(MeCN)]<sup>2+</sup>, which was isolated and characterized by X-ray crystallography,
revealing that the CH<sub>3</sub>CN positioned <i>trans</i> to the phen ligand is more photolabile than that positioned <i>trans</i> to the biq ligand when irradiated with low energy
light. These results are explained using the calculated stabilities
of the two possible products, together with the molecular orbitals
involved in the lowest energy excited state
New Ligand Design Provides Delocalization and Promotes Strong Absorption throughout the Visible Region in a Ru(II) Complex
The
new RuÂ(II)–anthraquinone complex [RuÂ(bpy)<sub>2</sub>(qdpq)]Â(PF<sub>6</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>Ru-qdpq</b>; bpy =
2,2′-bipyridine; qdpq = 2,3-diÂ(2-pyridyl)ÂnaphthoÂ[2,3-<i>f</i>]Âquinoxaline-7,12-quinone) possesses a strong <sup>1</sup>MLCT Ru → qdpq absorption with a maximum at 546 nm that tails
into the near-IR and is significantly red-shifted relative to that
of the related complex [RuÂ(bpy)<sub>2</sub>(qdppz)]Â(PF<sub>6</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>Ru-qdppz</b>; qdppz = naphthoÂ[2,3-<i>a</i>]ÂdipyridoÂ[3,2-h:2′,3′-f]Âphenazine-5,18-dione),
with λ<sub>max</sub> = 450 nm. <b>Ru-qdppz</b> possesses
electronically isolated proximal and distal qdppz-based excited states;
the former is initially generated and decays to the latter, which
repopulates the ground state with Ï„ = 362 ps. In contrast, excitation
of <b>Ru-qdpq</b> results in the population of a relatively
long-lived (Ï„ = 19 ns) RuÂ(dÏ€) → qdpqÂ(Ï€*) <sup>3</sup>MLCT excited state where the promoted electron is delocalized
throughout the qdpq ligand. Ultrafast spectroscopy, used together
with steady-state absorption, electrochemistry, and DFT calculations,
indicates that the unique coordination modes of the qdpq and qdppz
ligands impart substantially different electronic communication throughout
the quinone-containing ligand, affecting the excited state and electron
transfer properties of these molecules. These observations create
a pathway to synthesize complexes with red-shifted absorptions that
possess long-lived, redox-active excited states that are useful for
various applications, including solar energy conversion and photochemotherapy
Selective Photoinduced Ligand Exchange in a New Tris–Heteroleptic Ru(II) Complex
The
complex <i>cis</i>-[RuÂ(biq)Â(phen)Â(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>, biq = 2,2′-biquinoline,
phen = 1,10-phenathroline) displays selective photosubstitution of
only one CH<sub>3</sub>CN ligand with a solvent molecule upon irradiation
with low energy light (λ<sub>irr</sub> ≥ 550 nm), whereas
both ligands exchange with λ<sub>irr</sub> ≥ 420 nm.
In contrast, [RuÂ(phen)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>) and [RuÂ(biq)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>3</b>) exchange both CH<sub>3</sub>CN ligands
with similar rates upon irradiation with a broad range of wavelengths.
The photolysis of <b>1</b> in the presence of pyridine (py)
results in the formation of the intermediate <i>cis</i>-[RuÂ(biq)Â(phen)Â(py)Â(MeCN)]<sup>2+</sup>, which was isolated and characterized by X-ray crystallography,
revealing that the CH<sub>3</sub>CN positioned <i>trans</i> to the phen ligand is more photolabile than that positioned <i>trans</i> to the biq ligand when irradiated with low energy
light. These results are explained using the calculated stabilities
of the two possible products, together with the molecular orbitals
involved in the lowest energy excited state
Excited State Dynamics of Two New Ru(II) Cyclometallated Dyes: Relation to Cells for Solar Energy Conversion and Comparison to Conventional Systems
The preparation, characterization, and photophysical
properties
of a series of rutheniumÂ(II) complexes possessing the cyclometallating
deprotonated 2-phenyl pyridine ligand, phpy<sup>–</sup>, together
with dppn (benzoÂ[<i>i</i>]ÂdipyridoÂ[3,2-<i>a</i>:2′,3′-<i>c</i>]Âphenazine), a ligand with
an extended π-system, are reported. Related complexes have been
used as efficient dyes in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), and
the Ru→dppn metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) absorption
of the new complexes [RuÂ(phpy)Â(bpy)Â(dppn)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>4</b>) and [RuÂ(phpy)Â(dppn)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup> (<b>5</b>) is
red-shifted relative to the Ru→bpy MLCT peak in [RuÂ(phpy)Â(bpy)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>). These new compounds are compared
to conventional complexes where phpy<sup>–</sup> is replaced
by 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), including [RuÂ(bpy)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, [RuÂ(bpy)<sub>2</sub>(dppn)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>), and [RuÂ(bpy)Â(dppn)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>).
Unlike <b>1</b> and <b>2</b>, with long-lived dppn-centered <sup>3</sup>ππ* excited states (τ ∼ 20 μs),
the corresponding cyclometallated complexes <b>4</b> and <b>5</b> exhibit weakly emissive Ru→dppn <sup>3</sup>MLCT
states with transient absorption lifetimes of 25 and 45 ps, respectively,
which are significantly shorter than that of <b>3</b>, ∼9
ns. Although it is desirable to shift the absorption of ruthenium
dyes used in DSSCs to lower energies, it is evident from this work,
that for cyclometallated phpy<sup>–</sup> complexes, lowering
the energy of the <sup>3</sup>MLCT state below that of <b>3</b> results in significant shortening of the excited state lifetime.
The fast excited state decay, together with the lower energy of the <sup>1</sup>MLCT state, may result in lower charge injection efficiencies
from these types of complexes
Unusually Efficient Pyridine Photodissociation from Ru(II) Complexes with Sterically Bulky Bidentate Ancillary Ligands
The introduction of steric bulk to
the bidentate ligand in [RuÂ(tpy)Â(bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>1</b>; tpy = 2,2′:2′,6″-terpyridine;
bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine; py = pyridine) to provide [RuÂ(tpy)Â(Me<sub>2</sub>bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>2</b>; Me<sub>2</sub>bpy
= 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) and [RuÂ(tpy)Â(biq)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup> (<b>3</b>; biq = 2,2′-biquinoline) facilitates
photoinduced dissociation of pyridine with visible light. Upon irradiation
of <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> in CH<sub>3</sub>CN (λ<sub>irr</sub> = 500 nm), ligand exchange occurs to produce the corresponding
[RuÂ(tpy)Â(NN)Â(NCCH<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> (NN = Me<sub>2</sub>bpy,
biq) complex with quantum yields, Φ<sub>500</sub>, of 0.16(1)
and 0.033(1) for <b>2</b> and <b>3</b>, respectively.
These values represent an increase in efficiency of the reaction by
2–3 orders of magnitude as compared to that of <b>1</b>, Φ<sub>500</sub> < 0.0001, under similar experimental conditions.
The photolysis of <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> in H<sub>2</sub>O with low energy light to produce [RuÂ(tpy)Â(NN)Â(OH<sub>2</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> (NN = Me<sub>2</sub>bpy, biq) also proceeds rapidly (λ<sub>irr</sub> > 590 nm). Complexes <b>1</b>–<b>3</b> are stable in the dark in both CH<sub>3</sub>CN and H<sub>2</sub>O under similar experimental conditions. X-ray crystal structures
and theoretical calculations highlight significant distortion of the
planes of the bidentate ligands in <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> relative to that of <b>1</b>. The crystallographic dihedral
angles defined by the bidentate ligand, Me<sub>2</sub>bpy in <b>2</b> and biq in <b>3</b>, and the tpy ligand were determined
to be 67.87° and 61.89°, respectively, whereas only a small
distortion from the octahedral geometry is observed between bpy and
tpy in <b>1</b>, 83.34°. The steric bulk afforded by Me<sub>2</sub>bpy and biq also result in major distortions of the pyridine
ligand in <b>2</b> and <b>3</b>, respectively, relative
to <b>1</b>, which are believed to weaken its σ-bonding
and π-back-bonding to the metal and play a crucial role in the
efficiency of the photoinduced ligand exchange. The ability of <b>2</b> and <b>3</b> to undergo ligand exchange with λ<sub>irr</sub> > 590 nm makes them potential candidates to build photochemotherapeutic
agents for the delivery of drugs with pyridine binding groups
Photoinduced Ligand Exchange and Covalent DNA Binding by Two New Dirhodium Bis-Amidato Complexes
Two new dirhodium complexes, the head-to-tail (<i>H,T</i>) and head-to-head (<i>H,H</i>) isomers of <i>cis</i>-[Rh<sub>2</sub>(HNOCCH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>, were synthesized, separated,
and characterized
following the reaction of Rh<sub>2</sub>(HNOCCH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> with trimethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate in CH<sub>3</sub>CN. The
products were characterized by <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy, mass
spectrometry, elemental analysis, and single crystal X-ray diffraction.
Each bis-amidato isomer has a total of six CH<sub>3</sub>CN ligands,
two along the internuclear Rh–Rh axis, CH<sub>3</sub>CN<sub><i>ax</i></sub>, two in equatorial positions <i>trans</i> to the oxygen atoms of the bridging amidato groups, CH<sub>3</sub>CN<sub><i>eq</i></sub><sup><i>O</i></sup>, and
two in equatorial positions <i>trans</i> to the amidato
nitrogen atoms, CH<sub>3</sub>CN<sub><i>eq</i></sub><sup><i>N</i></sup>. When aqueous solutions of the complexes
are irradiated with low energy light (λ<sub>irr</sub> ≥
495 nm, 60 min), both types of CH<sub>3</sub>CN<sub><i>eq</i></sub> ligands undergo efficient ligand exchange with solvent H<sub>2</sub>O molecules to form monoaqua, followed by bis-aqua, adducts,
releasing two CH<sub>3</sub>CN<sub><i>eq</i></sub> ligands
in the process. The quantum yields, Φ<sub>400nm</sub>, for the <i>H,T</i> and <i>H,H</i> isomers to form monoaqua adducts
are 0.43 and 0.38, respectively, which are substantially greater than
the 0.13 yield observed for <i>cis</i>-[Rh<sub>2</sub>(O<sub>2</sub>CCH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CH<sub>3</sub>CN)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2+</sup>; importantly, no ligand exchange is observed when
the complexes are kept in the dark. Finally, low energy excitation
(λ<sub>irr</sub> ≥ 610 nm, 30 min) of the <i>H,T</i> isomer was shown to generate photoproducts that covalently bind
to linearized DNA, making <b>2</b> a potential agent for photochemotherapy
that does not require the formation of <sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>,
as is typical of organic photodynamic therapy (PDT) agents
Electronic and Steric Effects on the Photoisomerization of Dimethylsulfoxide Complexes of Ru(II) Containing Picolinate
Calculations were performed on [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(dmso)]<sup>2+</sup> (tpy = 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, dmso = dimethylsulfoxide, <b>1</b>), <i>cis</i>-[Ru(tpy)(Me-pic)(dmso)]<sup>+</sup> (Me-pic = 6-methylpicolinate, <b>2</b>), <i>trans</i>-[Ru(tpy)(Me-pic)(dmso)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>3</b>), and <i>trans</i>-[Ru(tpy)(pic)(dmso)]<sup>+</sup> (pic = picolinate, <b>4</b>) to gain an understanding of the differences in their photoisomerization behavior. The results do not support a promoting role for the σ* ligand field (LF) states during excited-state S→O isomerization. Instead, the calculations show that the Ru−S bonding, the identity of the highest occupied molecular orbital, and steric interactions are important factors in dmso photoisomerization. Furthermore, the atom positioned trans to the S atom plays a critical role in promoting enhanced photoisomerizataion yields
DFT Investigation of Ligand Photodissociation in [Ru<sup>II</sup>(tpy)(bpy)(py)]<sup>2+</sup> and [Ru<sup>II</sup>(tpy)(Me<sub>2</sub>bpy)(py)]<sup>2+</sup> Complexes
Photoinduced
ligand dissociation of pyridine occurs much more readily in [RuÂ(tpy)Â(Me<sub>2</sub>bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup> than in [RuÂ(tpy)Â(bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup> (tpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine; bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine,
Me<sub>2</sub>bpy = 6,6′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine; py
= pyridine). The S<sub>0</sub> ground state and the <sup>3</sup>MLCT
and <sup>3</sup>MC excited states of these complexes have been studied
using BP86 density functional theory with the SDD basis set and effective
core potential on Ru and the 6-31GÂ(d) basis set for the rest of the
atoms. In both complexes, excitation by visible light and intersystem
crossing leads to a <sup>3</sup>MLCT state in which an electron from
a Ru d orbital has been promoted to a π* orbital of terpyridine,
followed by pyridine release after internal conversion to a dissociative <sup>3</sup>MC state. Interaction between the methyl groups and the other
ligands causes significantly more strain in [RuÂ(tpy)Â(Me<sub>2</sub>bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup> than in [RuÂ(tpy)Â(bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup>, in
both the S<sub>0</sub> and <sup>3</sup>MLCT states. Transition to
the dissociative <sup>3</sup>MC states releases this strain, resulting
in lower barriers for ligand dissociation from [RuÂ(tpy)Â(Me<sub>2</sub>bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup> than from [RuÂ(tpy)Â(bpy)Â(py)]<sup>2+</sup>.
Analysis of the molecular orbitals along relaxed scans for stretching
the Ru–N bonds reveals that ligand photodissociation is promoted
by orbital mixing between the ligand π* orbital of tpy in the <sup>3</sup>MLCT state and the dσ* orbitals that characterize the
dissociative <sup>3</sup>MC states. Good overlap and strong mixing
occur when the Ru–N bond of the leaving ligand is perpendicular
to the π* orbital of terpyridine, favoring the release of pyridine
positioned in a <i>cis</i> fashion to the terpyridine ligand
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy Studies of a Fluorophore-Labeled Dirhodium Compound: Visualizing Metal–Metal Bonded Molecules in Lung Cancer (A549) Cells
The
new dirhodium compound [Rh<sub>2</sub>Â(μ‑O<sub>2</sub>CCH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Â(η<sup>1</sup>‑O<sub>2</sub>CCH<sub>3</sub>)Â(phenÂbodipy)Â(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>3</sub>]Â[O<sub>2</sub>CCH<sub>3</sub>] (<b>1</b>), which incorporates a bodipy fluorescent tag, was prepared and
studied by confocal fluorescence microscopy in human lung adenocarcinoma
(A549) cells. It was determined that <b>1</b> localizes mainly
in lysosomes and mitochondria with no apparent nuclear localization
in the 1–100 μM range. These results support the conclusion
that cellular organelles rather than the nucleus can be targeted by
modification of the ligands bound to the Rh<sub>2</sub><sup>4+</sup> core. This is the first study of a fluorophore-labeled metal–metal
bonded compound, work that opens up new venues for the study of intracellular
distribution of dinuclear transition metal anticancer complexes
Solid-Phase Synthesis as a Platform for the Discovery of New Ruthenium Complexes for Efficient Release of Photocaged Ligands with Visible Light
Ruthenium-based
photocaging groups have important applications as biological tools
and show great potential as therapeutics. A method was developed to
rapidly synthesize, screen, and identify ruthenium-based caging groups
that release nitriles upon irradiation with visible light. A diverse
library of tetra- and pentadentate ligands was synthesized on polystyrene
resin. Ruthenium complexes of the general formula [RuÂ(L)Â(MeCN)<sub><i>n</i></sub>]<sup><i>m</i>+</sup> (<i>n</i> = 1–3, <i>m</i> = 1–2) were generated
from these ligands on solid phase and then cleaved from resin for
photochemical analysis. Data indicate a wide range of spectral tuning
and reactivity with visible light. Three complexes that showed strong
absorbance in the visible range were synthesized by solution phase
for comparison. Photochemical behavior of solution- and solid-phase
complexes was in good agreement, confirming that the library approach
is useful in identifying candidates with desired photoreactivity in
short order, avoiding time-consuming chromatography and compound purification