Gender Differences in Emergency Department (ED) Patient Mechanical Fall Risk and Openness to Communication with Providers

Gender Differences in Emergency Department (ED) Patient Mechanical Fall Risk and Openness to Communication with Providers Bryan G Kane, MD, Michael C Nguyen MD, Robert D Barraco, MD MPH, Brian Stello MD, Arnold Goldberg MD, Clare M Lenhart, PhD MPH, Bernadette G Porter BA ,Anita Kurt PhD, RN, Marna Rayl Greenberg DO, MPH Objectives: The CDC reports that among older adults (≥65), falls are the leading cause of injury-related death and rates of fall-related fractures among older women are more than twice those for men. We set out to determine ED patient perceptions (analyzed by gender) about their personal fall risk compared to their actual risk and their comfort level in discussing their fall history or a home safety plan with their healthcare provider. Methods: After IRB approval, a convenience sample of ED patients (50 years or older) was surveyed at a suburban Level 1 Trauma center with an annual ED census of approximately 75,000. The survey included demographics, the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), and questions about fall risk. The FES is a validated survey measuring concern of falling. Analysis included descriptive statistics and assessment of fall risk and fear of falling by gender using chi-square and t-tests as indicated. Significance was set at 0.05. Results: Of the 150 surveys collected, 149 indicated gender and were included in this analysis. Fifty-five percent of the sample was female (n=82); 45% (n=67) were male. Most (98%) were Caucasian and 22% reported living alone. There was not a difference in the mean age of female participants 69.79 years (SD=12.08) vs. males 68.06 (SD=10.36; p=0.355). See Table 1 for distribution of reported fall risk factors between genders. Collectively, these variables resulted in a mean risk of falling score of 3.37(SD=1.62) out of 9. On average, female participants had a significantly higher objective risk of falling than did male participants (3.65 vs. 3.02 p=0.018). Similarly, females also reported greater fear of falling than did males (FES score 12.33 vs. 9.62; p=0.005). Significantly more females (41.5%) than males (23.9%, p=0.037) reported having fallen in the past year. Of the 50 participants reporting past-year falls, only 19 (12 female and 7 male, p=0.793) sought treatment. The correlation between actual fall risk and fear of falling were greater among females (p The majority of patients (76.4%) were willing to speak to a provider about their fall risk. No significant difference was noted in willingness to discuss this topic with a provider based on gender (p=0.619), objective fall risk (p=0.145) or FES score (p=0.986). Similarly, many respondents indicated a willing to discuss a home safety evaluation with a provider (58.1%) and responses did not vary significantly by gender (p=.140), objective fall risk (p=0.168) or FES score (p=.584). Conclusion: In this study, female ED patients reported a greater fear of falling, had a significantly higher objective risk of falling, and had a higher correlation between their perceived risk and actual risk of falling than did males. The majority of both genders were amenable to discussing their fall risk and a home safety evaluation with their provider

Modified CAGE as a Screening Tool for Mechanical Fall Risk Assessment: A Pilot Survey

Modified CAGE as a Screening Tool for Mechanical Fall Risk Assessment: A Pilot Survey Marna Rayl Greenberg DO, MPH, Michael C Nguyen MD, Bernadette G Porter BA,Robert DBarraco, MD MPH, Brian Stello MD, Arnold Goldberg MD, Clare M Lenhart, PhD MPH,Anita Kurt PhD, RN, Bryan G Kane, MD Background: Falls in the elderly cause serious injury. The literature does not hold answers to patient perceptions about their personal fall risk, their comfort level in discussing their fall history, or a home safety plan with their healthcare provider. Existing risk-assessing tools may be prohibitive in the Emergency Department due to their length and complexity. Objective: We piloted a modified CAGE screen (Fig1) to identify adults at risk for falls. Methods: At a community health event, a convenience sample ofparticipants (50 years or older) was surveyed. The survey included demographics, the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), the modified CAGEand questions about fall risk.The FES is a validated, but longer, survey metric for comparison. A modified CAGE score greater than or equal to 1 was considered positive. Analysis included descriptive statistics and modified CAGE groups were compared by gender, fall risk and history with chi-square. Results: One hundred sevensubjects (66.4%female, 32.7% male) with a mean age of 66 (SD7.9)participated; 98 (91.6%)were Caucasian. Twenty (18.7%) lived alone,43 (40.2%) had a cat or dog, and 91 (85%) had stairs at home. Six (5.6%) reported using assistive devices, 2 (1.9%) at-risk alcohol use; 9 (8.4%)taking blood thinners, 50 (46.7%) taking blood pressure medications, and 22 (20.6%) one or more medications that could make them drowsy. Thirty-threesubjects(30.8%) reported having fallen in the past year; only13 (39.4% of those fallen)sought treatment. Collectively, these variables resulted in a mean risk of falling score of 2.49 (SD=1.36) out of 9. Eleven (31.4%)femalesand27 (38.0%)malesrecorded ≥1 positive responses on the modified CAGE.A modified CAGE positive responsewas significantly greater among those with past-year falls (51.5%) than those without (29.7%), p=0.031.A positive modified CAGE screen was also associated with a higher mean FES score (10.82 v7.83, p More females than males reported past year falls (36.6% vs. 17.1%, p=0.04) yet no difference in fall risk was noted between genders (4.44 vs. 4.26, p=0.506). The proportion of modified CAGE positive participants did not vary between females and males (38% vs. 31%, p=0.505). Of those whoscreened positive on the modified CAGE, 36 (92.3%) reported comfort in speaking to their healthcare provider about their fall risk and 26 (66.7%) in having a home safety evaluation. Conclusions: In this pilot, a positive modified CAGE is associated with both higher FES scores and a willingness to discuss fall risk with a health care provider. The modifiedCAGE may be a usefulbrief screening tool to detect fall risk in adults. Further studies to determine the extent of its utility in an Emergency Department should be considered

Deltamethrin Resistance Mechanisms in Aedes aegypti Populations from Three French Overseas Territories Worldwide

BACKGROUND:Aedes aegypti is a cosmopolite mosquito, vector of arboviruses. The worldwide studies of its insecticide resistance have demonstrated a strong loss of susceptibility to pyrethroids, the major class of insecticide used for vector control. French overseas territories such as French Guiana (South America), Guadeloupe islands (Lesser Antilles) as well as New Caledonia (Pacific Ocean), have encountered such resistance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:We initiated a research program on the pyrethroid resistance in French Guiana, Guadeloupe and New Caledonia. Aedes aegypti populations were tested for their deltamethrin resistance level then screened by an improved microarray developed to specifically study metabolic resistance mechanisms. Cytochrome P450 genes were implicated in conferring resistance. CYP6BB2, CYP6M11, CYP6N12, CYP9J9, CYP9J10 and CCE3 genes were upregulated in the resistant populations and were common to other populations at a regional scale. The implication of these genes in resistance phenomenon is therefore strongly suggested. Other genes from detoxification pathways were also differentially regulated. Screening for target site mutations on the voltage-gated sodium channel gene demonstrated the presence of I1016 and C1534. CONCLUSION /SIGNIFICANCE:This study highlighted the presence of a common set of differentially up-regulated detoxifying genes, mainly cytochrome P450 genes in all three populations. GUA and GUY populations shared a higher number of those genes compared to CAL. Two kdr mutations well known to be associated to pyrethroid resistance were also detected in those two populations but not in CAL. Different selective pressures and genetic backgrounds can explain such differences. These results are also compared with those obtained from other parts of the world and are discussed in the context of integrative research on vector competence

Is accuracy of weight perception associated with health risk behaviors in a diverse sample of obese adolescents?

Current evidence is equivocal as to whether adolescent\u27s perception of weight status is linked to both healthy and risky behaviors. This study examined the association between accurate and inaccurate perception of weight and self-reported health and risk behaviors among a diverse sample of obese, urban adolescents. Data were analyzed from 1,180 participants in the 2009 Philadelphia Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Health behaviors of obese students self-identifying as very or slightly overweight were compared to obese students who underestimated their weight status. Accurate self-identifiers of weight status were significantly more likely to report trying to lose weight, bullying victimization, and suicide attempts as compared to obese students underestimating their weight status. Findings suggest that it is important for school nurses to understand that perceived weight status confers distinct risk profiles and differing needs for health-related services related to the physical, mental, and social health of adolescents

Perceived neighborhood safety related to physical activity but not recreational screen-based sedentary behavior in adolescents

Abstract Background A growing proportion of adolescents have poor cardiovascular health behaviors, including low levels of physical activity and high levels of sedentary behavior, thus increasing the likelihood of poor heart health in later years. This study tested the hypothesis that low perceived neighborhood safety would be associated with low levels of physical activity and high levels of recreational sedentary behavior in high-school students. Methods Using cross-sectional, weighted data from the 2015 Pennsylvania (USA) State and Philadelphia city Youth Risk Behavior Survey, multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the association between perceived neighborhood safety, and physical activity levels and recreational screen-based sedentary behavior time respectively, while controlling for potential confounders. Results After adjustment for other significant correlates of physical activity, students with low perceived neighborhood safety had a 21% reduced odds of being physically active on 5 or more days of the last week as compared to those who felt safe (p = 0.044). Perceived safety was not related to sedentary behavior; but sports team participation emerged as a strong correlate of low screen-based sedentary behavior (OR = 0.73, p = .002). Conclusion These data add to a growing body of work demonstrating the importance of perceived safety with physical activity levels in youth. Sports team participation may be a viable target to reduce screen-based sedentary time

Prevention of Conduct Disorder Do We Have Reason to Be Hopeful?

Abstract The cluster of behavior problems known as the disruptive behavior disorders, including oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, represent the most common reason for referral among all childhood mental health problems. Without early preventive and intervention services, these behaviors may escalate over time, becoming more frequent, severe, and maladaptive in nature, resulting in significant and long-lasting negative consequences that affect individuals, families, schools, communities, and society in general. Historically, disruptive behavior disorders were perceived to be some of the most difficult disorders with which to intervene and ameliorate symptoms. Fortunately, evidence-based preventive and early intervention programs delivered across various settings have been developed that improve outcomes for these children and adolescents and their families