A study of optimal automotive materials choice given market and regulatory uncertainty

Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2008.Includes bibliographical references (p. 183-185).This present thesis hypothesized that the increasing demand for fuel-efficient vehicles, recently updated Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulation, and volatile U.S. sales markets may foreshadow a shift in the competitiveness of lightweight alternative materials relative to incumbent steels. To test this hypothesis, a novel automotive materials selection methodology was developed which evaluates the net present value (NPV) of vehicle projects by incorporating five integrated models: (1) an ADVISORbased vehicle performance model, (2) a market model that predicts expected annual sales, (3) a cost model that maps technology decisions and sales levels to fixed and variable costs, (4) a binomial lattice model of demand uncertainty, and (5) a regulatory model that mimics CAFE. The integrated model solves materials selection problems by optimization, using explicit simulation to find the set of materials choices for which the NPV of a vehicle project is maximized. A case study was developed to illuminate the competitive dynamics between incumbent steel and lightweight composite materials in two vehicle subsystems (body-in-white, closure set) and three vehicle markets (small car, mid-size car, luxury car). The results suggest that the value of acceleration improvements due to a lightweight materials enabled vehicle mass reduction is greater than the value of concurrent fuel economy improvements. When the value of acceleration improvements and fuel economy improvements are considered, the production volume at which it becomes economically efficient to switch from using composites to using steel shifts from the cost-competitive production volume to a higher one. The magnitude of this shift depends on the degree to which the car market values performance improvements and the rate at which composites become more costly than steel. Generally, more stringent CAFE policies were found to improve composite materials' competitiveness to a greater degree than the effects of demand uncertainty.by Robert Joseph Cirincione, Jr.S.M.in Technology and Polic

WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications

Examines what the intelligence community understood about Iraq's WMD programs before the 2003 war in Iraq. Outlines policy reforms designed to improve assessments, deter transfer of WMD to terrorists, and avoid politicization of the intelligence process

Uphold the nuclear weapons test moratorium

The Trump administration is considering renewing nuclear weapons testing (1), a move that could increase the risk of another nuclear arms race as well as an inadvertent or intentional nuclear war. Following in the long tradition of scientists opposing nuclear weapons due to their harmful effects on both humanity and the planet (2), we ask the U.S. government to desist from plans to conduct nuclear tests. During the Cold War, the United States conducted 1030 nuclear weapons tests, more than all other nuclear-armed nations combined (3). In 1996, the United States signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), agreeing not to conduct a nuclear weapons test of any yield (4). The United States has not yet ratified the CTBT but did spearhead the 2016 adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2310, which calls upon all countries to uphold the object and purpose of the CTBT by not conducting nuclear tests (5). Eight of the nine nuclear-armed states, including the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, have observed a moratorium on nuclear testing since 1998 (3, 4). The ninth, North Korea, responding to international pressure, stopped testing warhead detonations (as opposed to missile flights) in 2017 (6). If the United States ratified the CTBT, joining the 168 countries who have already done so (4), there is a good chance that the other holdout countries would ratify the treaty as well (7)

Uphold the nuclear weapons test moratorium

The Trump administration is considering renewing nuclear weapons testing (1), a move that could increase the risk of another nuclear arms race as well as an inadvertent or intentional nuclear war. Following in the long tradition of scientists opposing nuclear weapons due to their harmful effects on both humanity and the planet (2), we ask the U.S. government to desist from plans to conduct nuclear tests. During the Cold War, the United States conducted 1030 nuclear weapons tests, more than all other nuclear-armed nations combined (3). In 1996, the United States signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), agreeing not to conduct a nuclear weapons test of any yield (4). The United States has not yet ratified the CTBT but did spearhead the 2016 adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 2310, which calls upon all countries to uphold the object and purpose of the CTBT by not conducting nuclear tests (5). Eight of the nine nuclear-armed states, including the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, have observed a moratorium on nuclear testing since 1998 (3, 4). The ninth, North Korea, responding to international pressure, stopped testing warhead detonations (as opposed to missile flights) in 2017 (6). If the United States ratified the CTBT, joining the 168 countries who have already done so (4), there is a good chance that the other holdout countries would ratify the treaty as well (7)

Deadly arsenals : tracking weapons of mass destruction/ Cirincione

x, 465 hal. : ill. ; 25 c