40 research outputs found

    Regularity of quasi-symbolic and bracket powers of Borel type ideals

    Full text link
    In this paper, we show that the regularity of the q-th quasi-symbolic power I((q))I^{((q))} and the regularity of the qq-th bracket power I[q]I^{[q]} of a monomial ideal of Borel type II, satisfy the relations reg(I((q)))≀qβ‹…reg(I)reg(I^{((q))})\leq q \cdot reg(I), respectively reg(I[q])β‰₯qβ‹…reg(I)reg(I^{[q]})\geq q\cdot reg(I). Also, we give an upper bound for reg(I[q])reg(I^{[q]}).Comment: 8 pages, to appear in Romanian Journal of Mathematics and Computer Scienc

    On the Stanley depth of edge ideals of line and cyclic graphs

    Full text link
    We prove that the edge ideals of line and cyclic graphs and their quotient rings satisfy the Stanley conjecture. We compute the Stanley depth for the quotient ring of the edge ideal associated to a cycle graph of length nn, given a precise formula for n≑0,2(mod3)n\equiv 0,2 \pmod{3} and tight bounds for n≑1(mod3)n\equiv 1 \pmod{3}. Also, we give bounds for the Stanley depth of a quotient of two monomial ideals, in combinatorial terms.Comment: 8 pages. Will appear in Romanian Journal of Mathematics and Computer Scienc

    Some remarks on the Stanley's depth for multigraded modules

    Get PDF
    We show that the Stanley's conjecture holds for any multigraded SS-module MM with \sdepth(M)=0, where S=K[x1,...,xn]S=K[x_1,...,x_n]. Also, we give some bounds for the Stanley depth of the powers of the maximal irrelevant ideal in SS.Comment: 6 page

    Stanley depth of monomial ideals with small number of generators

    Full text link
    For a monomial ideal IβŠ‚S=K[x1,...,xn]I\subset S=K[x_1,...,x_n], we show that \sdepth(S/I)\geq n-g(I), where g(I)g(I) is the number of the minimal monomial generators of II. If I=vIβ€²I=vI', where v∈Sv\in S is a monomial, then we see that \sdepth(S/I)=\sdepth(S/I'). We prove that if II is a monomial ideal IβŠ‚SI\subset S minimally generated by three monomials, then II and S/IS/I satisfy the Stanley conjecture. Given a saturated monomial ideal IβŠ‚K[x1,x2,x3]I\subset K[x_1,x_2,x_3] we show that \sdepth(I)=2. As a consequence, \sdepth(I)\geq \sdepth(K[x_1,x_2,x_3]/I)+1 for any monomial ideal in IβŠ‚K[x1,x2,x3]I\subset K[x_1,x_2,x_3].Comment: 7 pages. submitted to Central European Journal of Mathematic
    corecore