Dose-Dense Nonpegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin and Docetaxel Combination in Breast Cancer: Dose-Finding Study AUTHOR SUMMARY

ABSTRACT Background. Anthracyclines and taxanes are effective drugs in breast cancer (BC), but their toxicity profiles limit their use in combination. A dose-finding study was performed to determine maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (TLC-D99) and docetaxel (DTX) as a dose-dense schedule, to maintain dose intensity, and to limit toxicity, particularly cardiac. Methods. Twenty-four patients were enrolled, 12 with metastatic BC, 5 with locally advanced BC, and 7 with early BC. An intra-and interpatient approach was planned in two sequential steps. In the first step,TLC-D99 was administered at dose levels of 40, 45, and 50 mg/m 2 plus DTX at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m 2 . In the second step,TLC-D99 was administered at the dose established in the first step plus DTX at dose levels of 55, 60, and 65 mg/m 2 . Every treatment cycle was delivered on day 1 every 14 days. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was scheduled on day 2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as G4 hematological; G3 nonhematological; $10$20% left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction if the final value was ,50% or $50$20% LVEF reduction in 1 patient and symptomatic arrhythmia in another; 2 incidences of G4 neutropenia (8.3%); and 1 occurrence of G3 asthenia (4.2%) were reported. MTDs were not reached. The recommended doses were established as TLC-D99 50 mg/

Dose-Dense Nonpegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin and Docetaxel Combination in Breast Cancer: Dose-Finding Study AUTHOR SUMMARY

ABSTRACT Background. Anthracyclines and taxanes are effective drugs in breast cancer (BC), but their toxicity profiles limit their use in combination. A dose-finding study was performed to determine maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (TLC-D99) and docetaxel (DTX) as a dose-dense schedule, to maintain dose intensity, and to limit toxicity, particularly cardiac. Methods. Twenty-four patients were enrolled, 12 with metastatic BC, 5 with locally advanced BC, and 7 with early BC. An intra-and interpatient approach was planned in two sequential steps. In the first step,TLC-D99 was administered at dose levels of 40, 45, and 50 mg/m 2 plus DTX at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m 2 . In the second step,TCL-D99 was administered at the dose established in the first step plus DTX at dose levels of 55, 60, and 65 mg/m 2 . Every treatment cycle was delivered on day 1 every 14 days. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was scheduled on day 2. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as G4 hematological; G3 nonhematological; $10$20% left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reduction if the final value was ,50% or $50$20% LVEF reduction in 1 patient and symptomatic arrhythmia in another; 2 incidences of G4 neutropenia (8.3%); and 1 occurrence of G3 asthenia (4.2%) were reported. MTDs were not reached. The recommended doses were established as TLC-D99 50 mg/

Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim results

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography, ultrasonography (US), and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for screening women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer and report interim results, with pathologic findings as standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board of each center approved the research; informed written consent was obtained. CBE, mammography, US, and MR imaging were performed for yearly screening of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, first-degree relatives of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, or women enrolled because of a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer (three or more events in first- or second-degree relatives in either maternal or paternal line; these included breast cancer in women younger than 60 years, ovarian cancer at any age, and male breast cancer at any age). RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-eight women (mean age, 46 years +/- 12 [standard deviation]) were enrolled. Breast cancer was found in 11 of 278 women at first round and seven of 99 at second round (14 invasive, four intraductal; eight were <or=10 mm in diameter). Detection rate per year was 4.8% (18 of 377) overall; 4.3% (11 of 258) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and first-degree relatives of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers versus 5.9% (seven of 119) in women enrolled because of strong family history; and 5.3% (nine of 169) in women with previous personal breast and/or ovarian cancer versus 4.3% (nine of 208) in those without. In six (33%) of 18 patients, cancer was detected only with MR imaging. Sensitivity was as follows: CBE, 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29%, 71%); mammography, 59% (95% CI: 36%, 78%); US, 65% (95% CI: 41%, 83%); and MR imaging, 94% (95% CI: 82%, 99%). Positive predictive value was as follows: CBE, 82% (95% CI: 52%, 95%); mammography, 77% (95% CI: 50%, 92%); US, 65% (95% CI: 41%, 83%); and MR imaging, 63% (95% CI: 43%, 79%). CONCLUSION: Addition of MR imaging to the screening regimen for high-risk women may enable detection of otherwise unsuspected breast cancers