The Prevalence and Characteristics of Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure: A Chart Review Study

Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the common complications of heart failure (HF). The prevalence and characteristics of MR are rarely investigated, especially in the Chinese population. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of non-organic MR in HF patients and subgroups defined by ejection fraction. Methods: A single-center, hospital-based, and retrospective chart review study included patients with heart failure admitted to the cardiovascular department from January 2017 to April 2020. Demographic characteristics, laboratory results, and echocardiogram results before discharge were analyzed in different groups defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) using logistic regression and adjusted for confounders. Results: Finally, 2418 validated HF patients (age 67.2 ± 13.5 years; 68.03% men) were included. The prevalence of MR was 32.7% in HF, 16.7% in HF with preserve EF patients, 28.4% in HF with mid-range EF patients and 49.7% in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) patients. In the HF with preserved EF group, multivariable logistic regression showed that 4 factors associated with MR including EF (odds ratio (OR) 0.954 (0.928–0.981), p = 0.001), left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastolic phase (LVPWd) (OR 0.274 (0.081–0.932), p = 0.038), left atrium (LA) dimension (OR 2.049 (1.631–2.576), p < 0.001) and age (OR 1.024 (1.007–1.041), p = 0.007). In the HF with midrange EF group, multivariable logistic regression showed that 3 factors associated with MR including LA dimension (OR 2.009 (1.427–2.829), p < 0.001), triglycerides (TG) (OR 0.552 (0.359–0.849), p = 0.007) and digoxin (OR 2.836 (1.624–4.951), p < 0.001). In the HFrEF group, multivariable logistic regression showed that 7 factors associated with MR including EF (OR 0.969 (0.949–0.990), p = 0.004), (OR 0.161 (0.067–0.387), p < 0.001), LA dimension (OR 2.289 (1.821–2.878), p < 0.001), age (OR 1.016 (1.004–1.027)), p = 0.009), TG (OR 0.746 (0.595–0.936), p = 0.011), diuretics (OR 0.559 (0.334–0.934), p = 0.026) and ICD (OR 1.898 (1.074–3.354), p = 0.027). Conclusions: HF patients had a high burden of MR, particularly in the HFrEF group. Worsen cardiac structure (LA dimension and LVPWd) and function (EF), age, and medical treatment strategy played essential roles in MR

Image_1_Analysis of the gut microbiota in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease using metagenomics and metabolomics.jpeg

BackgroundThere is no direct evidence of gut microbiota disturbance in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to provide direct evidence and a comprehensive understanding of gut microbiota disturbance in children with GERD through combined metagenomic and metabolomic analysis.Methods30 children with GERD and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were continuously enrolled, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were collected. First, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to evaluate differences in the gut microbiota between children with GERD and HC group, and 10 children with GERD and 10 children in the HC group were selected for metagenomic analysis. Nontargeted metabolomic analysis was performed using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), and metagenomic and metabolomic data were analyzed together.ResultsThere were significant differences in the gut microbiota diversity and composition between children with GERD and HCs. The dominant bacteria in children with GERD were Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota. At the species level, the top three core bacterial groups were Bacteroides stercoris, Bacteroides vulgatus and Alistipes putredinis. The main differential pathways were identified to be related to energy, amino acid, vitamin, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. LC/MS detected 288 different metabolites in the positive and negative ion modes between children with GERD and HCs, which were mainly involved in arachidonic acid (AA), tyrosine, glutathione and caffeine metabolism.ConclusionThis study provides new evidence of the pathogenesis of GERD. There are significant differences in the gut microbiota, metabolites and metabolic pathways between HCs and children with GERD, and the differences in metabolites are related to specific changes in bacterial abundance. In the future, GERD may be treated by targeting specific bacteria related to AA metabolism.</p

DataSheet_1_Analysis of the gut microbiota in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease using metagenomics and metabolomics.pdf

BackgroundThere is no direct evidence of gut microbiota disturbance in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to provide direct evidence and a comprehensive understanding of gut microbiota disturbance in children with GERD through combined metagenomic and metabolomic analysis.Methods30 children with GERD and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were continuously enrolled, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were collected. First, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to evaluate differences in the gut microbiota between children with GERD and HC group, and 10 children with GERD and 10 children in the HC group were selected for metagenomic analysis. Nontargeted metabolomic analysis was performed using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), and metagenomic and metabolomic data were analyzed together.ResultsThere were significant differences in the gut microbiota diversity and composition between children with GERD and HCs. The dominant bacteria in children with GERD were Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota. At the species level, the top three core bacterial groups were Bacteroides stercoris, Bacteroides vulgatus and Alistipes putredinis. The main differential pathways were identified to be related to energy, amino acid, vitamin, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. LC/MS detected 288 different metabolites in the positive and negative ion modes between children with GERD and HCs, which were mainly involved in arachidonic acid (AA), tyrosine, glutathione and caffeine metabolism.ConclusionThis study provides new evidence of the pathogenesis of GERD. There are significant differences in the gut microbiota, metabolites and metabolic pathways between HCs and children with GERD, and the differences in metabolites are related to specific changes in bacterial abundance. In the future, GERD may be treated by targeting specific bacteria related to AA metabolism.</p

Table_1_Analysis of the gut microbiota in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease using metagenomics and metabolomics.docx

BackgroundThere is no direct evidence of gut microbiota disturbance in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to provide direct evidence and a comprehensive understanding of gut microbiota disturbance in children with GERD through combined metagenomic and metabolomic analysis.Methods30 children with GERD and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were continuously enrolled, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were collected. First, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to evaluate differences in the gut microbiota between children with GERD and HC group, and 10 children with GERD and 10 children in the HC group were selected for metagenomic analysis. Nontargeted metabolomic analysis was performed using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), and metagenomic and metabolomic data were analyzed together.ResultsThere were significant differences in the gut microbiota diversity and composition between children with GERD and HCs. The dominant bacteria in children with GERD were Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota. At the species level, the top three core bacterial groups were Bacteroides stercoris, Bacteroides vulgatus and Alistipes putredinis. The main differential pathways were identified to be related to energy, amino acid, vitamin, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. LC/MS detected 288 different metabolites in the positive and negative ion modes between children with GERD and HCs, which were mainly involved in arachidonic acid (AA), tyrosine, glutathione and caffeine metabolism.ConclusionThis study provides new evidence of the pathogenesis of GERD. There are significant differences in the gut microbiota, metabolites and metabolic pathways between HCs and children with GERD, and the differences in metabolites are related to specific changes in bacterial abundance. In the future, GERD may be treated by targeting specific bacteria related to AA metabolism.</p

Image_2_Analysis of the gut microbiota in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease using metagenomics and metabolomics.jpeg

BackgroundThere is no direct evidence of gut microbiota disturbance in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to provide direct evidence and a comprehensive understanding of gut microbiota disturbance in children with GERD through combined metagenomic and metabolomic analysis.Methods30 children with GERD and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were continuously enrolled, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were collected. First, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to evaluate differences in the gut microbiota between children with GERD and HC group, and 10 children with GERD and 10 children in the HC group were selected for metagenomic analysis. Nontargeted metabolomic analysis was performed using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), and metagenomic and metabolomic data were analyzed together.ResultsThere were significant differences in the gut microbiota diversity and composition between children with GERD and HCs. The dominant bacteria in children with GERD were Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota. At the species level, the top three core bacterial groups were Bacteroides stercoris, Bacteroides vulgatus and Alistipes putredinis. The main differential pathways were identified to be related to energy, amino acid, vitamin, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. LC/MS detected 288 different metabolites in the positive and negative ion modes between children with GERD and HCs, which were mainly involved in arachidonic acid (AA), tyrosine, glutathione and caffeine metabolism.ConclusionThis study provides new evidence of the pathogenesis of GERD. There are significant differences in the gut microbiota, metabolites and metabolic pathways between HCs and children with GERD, and the differences in metabolites are related to specific changes in bacterial abundance. In the future, GERD may be treated by targeting specific bacteria related to AA metabolism.</p