2 research outputs found

    Mean facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) of all analyzed groups.

    No full text
    <p>Plainly shaded bars indicate measurements by Raters 1 and 2; patterned bars indicate measurements by Raters 1 and 3. The main analysis compares CEOs, NGOs and popes (patterned, dark grey) with the mean of all control groups (patterned, light grey). The matching analysis compares CEOs, NGOs, and popes (plain, dark grey) with their matched controls (plain, light grey), respectively. Individual control groups (patterned, light grey, thin bars) from left to right: MIT (<i>N</i> = 6), BioID (<i>N</i> = 13), Stirling (<i>N</i> = 15), BaDaDa (<i>N</i> = 22), GTdb-crop (<i>N</i> = 26), Utrecht (<i>N</i> = 28), CK+ (<i>N</i> = 31), FACES Database (<i>N</i> = 40), Aberdeen (<i>N</i> = 53), Nottingham2 (<i>N</i> = 63), FaceDB (<i>N</i> = 95). Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.</p

    Scatter plots showing the associations between facial width-to-height ratio of CEOs of companies listed in the Dow Jones stock market index and performance measures.

    No full text
    <p>a) Employee satisfaction with their companies, b) employee satisfaction with their respective CEOs, c) the companies’ charitable donations and d) the companies’ positions in the 2012 Green Ranking (for additional analyses controlling for company revenues, see main text).</p
    corecore