Contributions from cognitive neuroscience to understanding functional mechanisms of visual search.

We argue that cognitive neuroscience can contribute not only information about the neural localization of processes underlying visual search, but also information about the functional nature of these processes. First we present an overview of recent work on whether search for form - colour conjunctions is constrained by processes involved in binding across the two dimensions. Patients with parietal lesions show a selective problem with form - colour conjunctive search relative to a more difficult search task not requiring cross-dimensional binding. This is consistent with an additional process - cross-dimensional binding - being involved in the conjunctive search task. We then review evidence from preview search using electrophysiological, brain imaging, and neuropsychological techniques suggesting preview benefits in search are not simply due to onset capture. Taken together the results highlight the value of using converging evidence from behavioural studies of normal observers and studies using neuroscientific methods. © 2006 Psychology Press Ltd

An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search.

We used a probe dot procedure to examine the time course of attention in preview search (Watson and Humphreys, 1997). Participants searched for an outline red vertical bar among other new red horizontal bars and old green vertical bars, superimposed on a blue background grid. Following the reaction time response for search, the participants had to decide whether a probe dot had briefly been presented. Previews appeared for 1,000 msec and were immediately followed by search displays. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated a standard preview benefit relative to a conjunction search baseline. In Experiment 2, search was combined with the probe task. Probes were more difficult to detect when they were presented 1,200 msec, relative to 800 msec, after the preview, but at both intervals detection of probes at the locations of old distractors was harder than detection on new distractors or at neutral locations. Experiment 3A demonstrated that there was no difference in the detection of probes at old, neutral, and new locations when probe detection was the primary task and there was also no difference when all of the shapes appeared simultaneously in conjunction search (Experiment 3B). In a final experiment (Experiment 4), we demonstrated that detection on old items was facilitated (relative to neutral locations and probes at the locations of new distractors) when the probes appeared 200 msec after previews, whereas there was worse detection on old items when the probes followed 800 msec after previews. We discuss the results in terms of visual marking and attention capture processes in visual search

Competitive interactions in visual working memory drive access to awareness

Models of biased competition assume that pre-activating a visual representation in visual working memory (VWM) biases perception towards memory-matching objects. Consistent with this, it has been shown that targets suppressed by interocular competition gain prioritized access to awareness when they match VWM content. Thus far, these VWM biases during interocular suppression have been investigated with minimal levels of competition, as there was always only one target stimulus and observers only held a single item in VWM. In the current study we investigated how VWM-based modulation of access to awareness is influenced by a) multiple-item competition within the stimulus display and b) multiple-item competition within VWM. Using the method of breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS), we replicated the finding that information matching the content of VWM is released from interocular suppression faster than non-matching information. This VWM-based facilitation was significantly reduced, though still present, when VWM load increased from one to two items, demonstrating a clear competitive constraint on the top-down modulation by VWM. Furthermore, we manipulated inter-stimulus competition by varying the presence of distractors. When distractors were present, VWM-based facilitation was no longer specific to interocular suppression, but also occurred for monocular displays. The results demonstrate that VWM-based visual biases occur in response to competition, whether between or within the eyes, and reconcile findings from different paradigms

Competitive interactions in visual working memory drive access to awareness

Models of biased competition assume that pre-activating a visual representation in visual working memory (VWM) biases perception towards memory-matching objects. Consistent with this, it has been shown that targets suppressed by interocular competition gain prioritized access to awareness when they match VWM content. Thus far, these VWM biases during interocular suppression have been investigated with minimal levels of competition, as there was always only one target stimulus and observers only held a single item in VWM. In the current study we investigated how VWM-based modulation of access to awareness is influenced by a) multiple-item competition within the stimulus display and b) multiple-item competition within VWM. Using the method of breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS), we replicated the finding that information matching the content of VWM is released from interocular suppression faster than non-matching information. This VWM-based facilitation was significantly reduced, though still present, when VWM load increased from one to two items, demonstrating a clear competitive constraint on the top-down modulation by VWM. Furthermore, we manipulated inter-stimulus competition by varying the presence of distractors. When distractors were present, VWM-based facilitation was no longer specific to interocular suppression, but also occurred for monocular displays. The results demonstrate that VWM-based visual biases occur in response to competition, whether between or within the eyes, and reconcile findings from different paradigms