4 research outputs found

    Plots of <i>An</i>. <i>arabiensis</i> estimates per water body type.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Bootstrap prediction estimates of late-stage <i>An</i>. <i>arabiensis</i> larvae per dip and (B) area-weighted abundance estimate of late-stage <i>An</i>. <i>arabiensis</i> larvae for each water body type. Area-weighted abundances and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated by multiplying estimated habitat size by the number of late-stage <i>An</i>. <i>arabiensis</i> larvae per dip estimated by bootstrapping a mixture distribution generated from GEE estimates of number of late-stage anophelines and the probability of finding <i>An</i>. <i>arabiensis</i> in the PCR samples. The hydrometric data is added for reference including hourly areal average rainfall, river stage recorded in the middle of the study site catchment and water table depth recorded towards the south of the study area.</p

    Examples from each water body type.

    No full text
    <p>The water body types were classified according to their geomorphological and hydrological characteristics. (A) Topographic convergence: saturated areas driven by topographic convergence of subsurface moisture; (B) Floodplain basins: depressions within floodplains of active river channels with well-developed levees; (C) Palaeochannels: associated with relict palaeochannel systems; (D)聽River channels: pools located in perennial or seasonally active river channels; and (E) Spring-fed pools.</p

    Contrasts in bootstrap estimated number of late-stage <i>An</i>. <i>arabiensis</i> larvae per dip using Method of Variance Estimates Recovery [67].

    No full text
    <p>Black = significant difference (95% confidence), grey聽= no significant difference, blank = not available (due to absence of larvae in one or both habitat types). T = topographic convergence, F聽=聽floodplain basin, P = palaeochannel, R = river channel and S = spring-fed pond.</p
    corecore