13 research outputs found

    Iodine Status of Brazilian School-Age Children: A National Cross-Sectional Survey

    No full text
    Salt iodization is the main public health policy to prevent and control iodine deficiency disorders. The National Salt Iodization Impact Assessment Survey (PNAISAL) was conducted to measure iodine concentration among Brazilian schoolchildren. A survey including 6–14-year-old schoolchildren from public and private schools from all 26 Brazilian states and the Federal District was carried out in the biennia 2008–2009 and 2013–2014. Municipalities, schools, and students were randomly selected. Students were interviewed at school using a standard questionnaire, which included the collection of demographic, educational, weight, height, and 10 mL non-fasting urine collection information. The analyses were weighted according to the population of students per federative unit. The median urinary iodine concentration (MUIC) for the entire sample by region, federative unit per school, and student characteristics, was described from the cutoff points defined by the World Health Organization (severe disability: <20 µg/L, moderate: 20–49 µg/L, mild: 50–99 µg/L, adequate: 100–199 µg/L, more than adequate: 200–299 µg/L, and excessive: >300 µg/L). In total, 18,864 students (95.9% of the total) from 818 schools in 477 municipalities from all federative units were included in this study. Almost 70% were brown skin color, nine-years-old or older, studied in urban schools, and were enrolled in elementary school. The prevalence of overweight/obesity, as measured by body mass index (BMI) for age, was about twice as high compared to nutritional deficits (17.3% versus 9.6%). The MUIC arrived at 276.7 µg/L (25th percentile = 175.5 µg/L and 75th percentile = 399.71 µg/L). In Brazil as a whole, the prevalence of mild, moderate, and severe deficit was 6.9%, 2.6%, and 0.6%, respectively. About one-fifth of the students (20.7%) had adequate iodine concentration, while 24.9% and 44.2% had more than adequate or excessive concentration, respectively. The prevalence of iodine deficits was significantly higher among younger female students from municipal public schools living in rural areas with the lowest BMI. The median urine iodine concentration showed that Brazilian students have an adequate nutritional intake, with a significant proportion of them evidencing overconsumption of this micronutrient

    Assistência pré-natal nos serviços públicos e privados de saúde: estudo transversal de base populacional em Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil Prenatal care in public and private health services: a population-based survey in Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil

    No full text
    Este estudo teve por objetivo avaliar a assistência recebida durante o pré-natal nos setores público e privado em Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Aplicou-se questionário padronizado a todas as mães residentes nesse município, cujos filhos nasceram nas duas únicas maternidades locais entre 1º de janeiro e 31 de dezembro de 2010. Os locais de consultas avaliados no setor público foram as unidades básicas de saúde (UBS) com e sem Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) e os ambulatórios; no setor privado foram as clínicas de convênio e os consultórios particulares. Utilizou-se o teste qui-quadrado para comparar proporções. A taxa de respondentes foi de 97,2% (2.395 em 2.464). Dentre as 23 variáveis e indicadores avaliados nesses locais, sete mostraram nítida vantagem para mães que consultaram na ESF e seis para mães atendidas em clínica de convênio e consultório particular. Quatro variáveis mostraram cobertura praticamente universal nos cinco locais estudados. A assistência pré-natal mostrou melhor cobertura para gestantes atendidas no setor privado. Gestantes atendidas na ESF apresentaram cobertura semelhante àquela observada no setor privado.<br>This study aimed to evaluate public and private prenatal care for women in Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Women who gave birth at the two local maternity hospitals from January 1 to December 31, 2010, answered a standardized questionnaire. The interview sites in the public sector were primary health care units with and without the Family Health Strategy (FHS) and outpatient clinics; the private sector included clinics operated by health plans and private physicians' offices. The chi-square test was used to compare proportions. The response rate was 97.2% (2,395 out of 2,464). Among the 23 target variables and indicators, seven showed a clear advantage for mothers who had received prenatal care under the FHS and six for health plan clinics and private offices. Four variables showed virtually universal coverage at all five study sites. Prenatal care showed better coverage for pregnant women treated in the private sector. Pregnant women treated under the FHS showed similar coverage to that in the private sector
    corecore