Dynamic spatial dispersion of repolarization is present in regions critical for ischemic ventricular tachycardia ablation

Background: The presence of dynamic substrate changes may facilitate functional block and reentry in ventricular tachycardia (VT). Objective: We aimed to study dynamic ventricular repolarization changes in critical regions of the VT circuit during sensed single extrastimulus pacing known as the Sense Protocol (SP). Methods: Twenty patients (aged 67 ± 9 years, 17 male) underwent VT ablation. A bipolar voltage map was obtained during sinus rhythm (SR) and right ventricular SP pacing at 20 ms above ventricular effective refractory period. Ventricular repolarization maps were constructed. Ventricular repolarization time (RT) was calculated from unipolar electrogram T waves, using the Wyatt method, as the dV/dtmax of the unipolar T wave. Entrainment or pace mapping confirmed critical sites for ablation. Results: The median global repolarization range (max-min RT per patient) was 166 ms (interquartile range [IQR] 143-181 ms) during SR mapping vs 208 ms (IQR 182-234) during SP mapping (P = .0003 vs intrinsic rhythm). Regions of late potentials (LP) had a longer RT during SP mapping compared to regions without LP (mean 394 ± 40 ms vs 342 ± 25 ms, P < .001). In paired regions of normal myocardium there was no significant spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR)/10 mm2 during SP mapping vs SR mapping (SDR 11 ± 6 ms vs 10 ± 6 ms, P = .54). SDR/10 mm2 was greater in critical areas of the VT circuit during SP mapping 63 ± 29 ms vs SR mapping 16 ± 9 ms (P < .001). Conclusion: Ventricular repolarization is prolonged in regions of LP and increases dynamically, resulting in dynamic SDR in critical areas of the VT circuit. These dynamic substrate changes may be an important factor that facilitates VT circuits

Cost-effectiveness of ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: Limitations in the trial evidence base

Objective: Catheter ablation is an important treatment for ventricular tachycardia (VT) that reduces the frequency of episodes of VT. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. / Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model was used to calculate the costs and health outcomes of catheter ablation or AAD treatment of VT for a hypothetical cohort of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. The health states and input parameters of the model were informed by patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) data using randomised clinical trial (RCT)-level evidence wherever possible. Costs were calculated from a 2018 UK perspective. / Results: Catheter ablation versus AAD therapy had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £144 150 (€161 448) per quality-adjusted life-year gained, over a 5-year time horizon. This ICER was driven by small differences in patient-reported HRQL between AAD therapy and catheter ablation. However, only three of six RCTs had measured patient-reported HRQL, and when this was done, it was assessed infrequently. Using probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the likelihood of catheter ablation being cost-effective was only 11%, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000 used by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. / Conclusion: Catheter ablation of VT is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with AAD therapy based on the current randomised trial evidence. However, better designed studies incorporating detailed and more frequent quality of life assessments are needed to provide more robust and informed cost-effectiveness analyses

A simple, cost-effective but highly efficient system for deriving ventricular cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells

published_or_final_versio

Epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia on uninterrupted warfarin: A safe approach for those with a strong indication for peri-procedural anticoagulation?

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for epicardial catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) advocate that epicardial access is avoided in anticoagulated patients and should be performed prior to heparinisation. Recent studies have shown that epicardial access may be safe in heparinised patients. However, no data exist for patients on oral anticoagulants. We investigated the safety of obtaining epicardial access on uninterrupted warfarin. METHODS: A prospective registry of patients undergoing epicardial VT ablation over two years was analysed. Consecutive patients in whom epicardial access was attempted were included. All patients were heparinised prior to epicardial access with a target activated clotting time (ACT) of 300-350s. Patients who had procedures performed on uninterrupted warfarin (in addition to heparin) were compared to those not taking an oral anticoagulant. RESULTS: 46 patients were included of which 13 were taking warfarin. There was no significant difference in clinical and procedural characteristics (except INR and AF) between the two groups. Epicardial access was achieved in all patients. There were no deaths and no patients required surgery. A higher proportion of patients in the warfarin group had a drop in haemoglobin of >2g/dL compared to the no-warfarin group (38.5% versus 27.3%, p=0.74) and delayed pericardial drain removal (7.8% versus 3.03%, p=0.47). There was no difference in overall procedural complication rate. No patients required warfarin reversal or blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Epicardial access can be achieved safely and effectively in patients' anticoagulated with warfarin and heparinised with therapeutic ACT. This may be an attractive option for patients with a high stroke risk

In Atrial Fibrillation, Omnipolar Voltage Maps More Accurately Delineate Scar Than Bipolar Voltage Maps.

BACKGROUND: Optimal method for voltage assessment in AF remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated different methods for assessing atrial voltage and their accuracy in identifying pulmonary vein reconnection sites (PVRSs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Patients with persistent AF undergoing ablation were included. De novo procedures: voltage assessment in AF with omnipolar voltage (OV) and bipolar voltage (BV) methodology and BV assessment in sinus rhythm (SR). Activation vector and fractionation maps were reviewed at voltage discrepancy sites on OV and BV maps in AF. AF voltage maps were compared with SR BV maps. Repeat ablation procedures: OV and BV maps in AF were compared to detect gaps in wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) lines that correlated with PVRS. RESULTS: Forty patients were included: 20 de novo and 20 repeat procedures. De novo procedure: OV vs BV maps in AF; average voltage 0.55 ± 0.18 mV vs 0.38 ± 0.12 mV; P = 0.002, voltage difference of 0.20 ± 0.07 mV; P = 0.003 at coregistered points and proportion of left atrium (LA) area occupied by low-voltage zones (LVZs) was smaller on OV maps (42.4% ± 12.8% OV vs 66.7% ± 12.7% BV; P < 0.001). LVZs identified on BV maps and not on OV maps correlated frequently to wavefront collision and fractionation sites (94.7%). OV AF maps agreed better with BV SR maps (voltage difference at coregistered points 0.09 ± 0.03 mV; P = 0.24) unlike BV AF maps (0.17 ± 0.07 mV, P = 0.002). Repeat ablation procedure: OV was superior in identifying WACA line gaps that correlated with PVRS than BV maps (area under the curve = 0.89, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OV AF maps improve voltage assessment by overcoming the impact of wavefront collision and fractionation. OV AF maps correlate better with BV maps in SR and more accurately delineate gaps on WACA lines at PVRS

A propensity matched case-control study comparing efficacy, safety and costs of the subcutaneous vs. transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) have become more widely available. However, comparisons with conventional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICD) are scarce. METHODS: We conducted a propensity matched case-control study including all patients that underwent S-ICD implantation over a five-year period in a single tertiary centre. Controls consisted of all TV-ICD implant patients over a contemporary time period excluding those with pacing indication, biventricular pacemakers and those with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia requiring anti-tachycardia pacing. Data was collected on device-related complications and mortality rates. A cost efficacy analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine S-ICD cases were propensity matched to 69 TV-ICD controls. During a mean follow-up of 31±19 (S-ICD) and 32±21months (TV-ICD; p=0.88) there was a higher rate of device-related complications in the TV-ICD group predominantly accounted for by lead failures (n=20, 29% vs. n=6, 9%; p=0.004). The total mean cost for each group, including the complication-related costs was £9967±4511 ($13,639±6173) and £12,601±1786 ($17,243±2444) in the TV-ICD and S-ICD groups respectively (p=0.0001). Even though more expensive S-ICD was associated with a relative risk reduction of device-related complication of 70% with a HR of 0.30 (95%CI 0.12-0.76; p=0.01) compared to TV-ICDs. CONCLUSIONS: TV-ICDs are associated with increased device-related complication rates compared to a propensity matched S-ICD group during a similar follow-up period. Despite the existing significant difference in unit cost of the S-ICD, overall S-ICD costs may be mitigated versus TV-ICDs over a longer follow-up period

Driver characteristics associated with structurally and electrically remodeled atria in persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by localized focal or rotational electrical activations termed drivers. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate how left atrial (LA) dilation and time in AF impact persistent AF mechanisms. METHODS: Patients with persistent AF <2 years underwent electrocardiographic image mapping. Potential drivers (PDs) were defined as rotational wavefront activity ≥1.5 revolutions or focal activations. Distribution of PDs was recorded using an 18-segment model. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled (age 61.3 ± 12.1 years). Of these patients, 47 were hypertensive, 14 had diabetes mellitus, and 10 had ischemic heart disease. AF duration was 8 [5–15] months. Median LA diameter was 39 [33–43] mm. Although LA dimensions did not correlate with overall PD burden or distribution, there was a modest correlation between increasing LA area (r = 0.235; P = .024) and LA volume (r = 0.216; P = .039) with proportion of PDs that were rotational. Although time in AF did not correlate with overall PD burden or distribution, there was a correlation between time in AF and the number of focal PDs (r = 0.203; P = .044). Female gender, increasing age, and hypertension also were associated with an increase in focal PDs. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate different AF mechanisms in patient subgroups. Greater understanding of patient-specific AF mechanisms may facilitate a tailored approach to AF mapping and ablation

Same-day discharge following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A safe and cost-effective approach

Introduction: The frequency of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased dramatically, stretching resources. Discharge on the same day as treatment may increase the efficiency and throughput. There are limited data regarding the safety of this strategy. / Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation in a tertiary center and in a district general hospital, and identified those discharged on the same day of treatment. The safety endpoint was any complication and/or presentation to hospital in the 48‐h and at 30 days postdischarge. We performed an economic analysis to calculate potential cost saving. / Results: Among a total population of 2628 patients, we identified 727 subjects (61.1 ± 12.5 years, 69.6% male) undergoing day‐case AF ablation. Cryoballoon technique was used in 79.2% of the day‐cases, and 91.6% of the procedures were performed under conscious sedation. 1.8% (13) of the participants met the safety composite endpoint at 48‐h, however only 0.7% (5) required at least 1 day of hospitalization. Bleeding or hematoma at the femoral access site (0.5%) and pericarditic chest pain (0.5%) were the main reasons for readmission. None experienced cardiac tamponade or other life‐threatening complications in the 48‐h postdischarge. Overall rate of complication and/or presentation to hospital at 30 days was 3.7%. Our day‐case policy resulted in an annual cost‐saving of approximately of £83 927 for our hospital. / Conclusion: In this large multicentre cohort, same‐day discharge in selected patients following AF ablation appears to be safe and cost‐effective, with a very low rate of early readmission or post‐discharge complication

Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation versus conventional pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Recurrent atrial fibrillation episodes following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are frequently due to reconnection of PVs. Adenosine can unmask dormant conduction, leading to additional ablation to improve AF-free survival. We performed a meta-analysis of the literature to assess the role of adenosine testing in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched through until December 2015 for studies reporting on the role of adenosine guided-PVI versus conventional PVI in AF ablation. RESULTS: Eleven studies including 4099 patients undergoing AF ablation were identified to assess the impact of adenosine testing. Mean age of the population was 61 ± 3 years: 25% female, 70% with paroxysmal AF. Follow up period of 12.5 ± 5.1 months. A significant benefit was observed in the studies published before 2013 (OR = 1.75; 95%CI 1.32–2.33, p < 0.001, I2 = 11%), retrospective (OR = 2.05; 95%CI 1.47–2.86, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and single-centre studies (OR = 1.58; 95%CI 1.19–2.10, p = 0.002, I2 = 30%). However, analysis of studies published since 2013 (OR = 1.41; 95% CI 0.87–2.29, p = 0.17, I2 = 75%) does not support any benefit from an adenosine-guided strategy. Similar findings were observed by pooling prospective case-control (OR = 1.39; 95%CI 0.93–2.07, p = 0.11, I2 = 75%), and prospective randomized controlled studies (OR = 1.62; 95%CI 0.81–3.24, p = 0.17, I2 = 86%). Part of the observed high heterogeneity can be explained by parameters such as dormant PVs percentage, use of new technology, improvement of center/operator experience, patients' characteristics including gender, age, and AF type. CONCLUSIONS: Pooling of contemporary data from high quality prospective case–control & prospective randomized controlled studies fails to show the benefit of adenosine-guided strategy to improve AF ablation outcomes

Model-assisted predictions on prognosis in HNSCC: do we learn?

Dedicated software packages incorporating prognostic models are meant to aid physicians in making accurate predictions of prognosis. This study concerns 742 predictions of 5-year survival on consecutive newly diagnosed patients with head- and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The 5-year survival predictions made by the physicians are not compared with actual survival, but with a prediction made by OncologIQ, a dedicated software package. We used a linear regression and a linear mixed-effects model to look at absolute differences between both predictions and possible learning effects. Predictions made by the physicians were optimistic and inaccurate. Using the linear regression and linear mixed-effects models, the physicians’ learning effect showed little improvement per successive prediction. We conclude that prognostic predictions in general are imprecise. When given feedback on the model’s predicted survival, the accuracy increases, but only very modestly