Van Velthoven single-knot running suture versus Chlostas running suture versus single barbed suture V-Loc for vesicourethral anastomosis in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy : a retrospective comparative study

INTRODUCTION: The quality of vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is associated with complications that could significantly affect quality of life. AIM: To compare different types of sutures (Chlosta’s versus Van Velthoven versus V-Loc), used for VUA in LRP in terms of complication rates and continence recovery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent LRP between 2014 and 2018 in a tertiary center were enrolled in the study. Data were extracted from medical records. Urinary continence was assessed at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after LRP. Propensity score weighted regression models were used to estimate the effect of sutures on outcomes. RESULTS: A sample of 504 patients was analyzed, of which 109 patients underwent Chlosta’s suture VUA, 117 patients had Van Velthoven suture VUA, and 278 patients had V-Loc VUA. Median time of anastomosis was 13 (IQR – interquartile range: 10–16) min using Chlosta’s suture, 28 (IQR: 24–30) using Van-Velthoven suture and 12 (IQR: 11–16) min using V-Loc suture (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups concerning complications and urinary continence at 12 and 18 months after surgery. The time of urinary continence recovery was on average 19 days (95% CI: 5–33) and 31 days (95% CI: 16–45) shorter during 1 year of observation when the V-Loc suture was used compared to the Van-Velthoven and Chlosta’s suture, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed comparable results considering urinary continence recovery at 12 and 18 months after LRP in all VUA groups. Van Velthoven VUA was more time-consuming and continence recovery was faster in the V-Loc group

Long-term functional outcomes of vesicourethral anastomosis with bladder neck preservation and distal urethral length preservation after videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer (PCa), with excellent oncologic outcomes; however, complications such as post-prostatectomy incontinence could significantly affect quality of life. AIM: To provide data on long-term urinary functional outcomes of bladder neck preservation (BNP) combined with distal urethral length preservation (DULP) in patients treated with videolaparoscopic prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, data were analysed from 619 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) due to localized prostate cancer between November 2014 and December 2018 in a single tertiary care centre in Poland. Of these patients, 227 had BNP and DULP during the procedure. Urinary continence status was assessed in patients at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after LRP. Cancer resection was assessed by surgical margin status. RESULTS: In the group with BNP and DULP, urinary continence recurred earlier than it did in the control group up to 3 months after surgery: 204 (89.8%) patients in this group were fully continent compared with 283 (72.2%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The difference was also significant after 6 months (95.1% vs. 80.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). Despite these early promising results, there was no difference in urinary continence recovery after 12 and 18 months. There was also no difference between the 2 groups regarding surgical margin status of the resected tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that BNP combined with DULP is a safe procedure that helps to improve early urinary continence rates after surgery without altering the risk of positive surgical margin

Changing patterns of urologic emergency visits and admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic : a retrospective, multicenter, nationwide study

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to examine the change in the number and severity of visits to the emergency departments (EDs) and subsequent admissions for urgent urologic conditions in the early stage of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Poland. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated data from 13 urologic centers in Poland and compared the number of visits to the EDs and subsequent admissions before and after the advent of COVID-19 in 2020, and before and after the escalating national restrictions. Furthermore, data on types of urologic complaints, crucial laboratory parameters, and post-admission procedures were analyzed. RESULTS: In total 1,696 and 2,187 urologic visits (22.45% decrease) and 387 and 439 urologic urgent admissions (11.85% decrease) were reported in given periods in 2020 and 2019, respectively. The year-over-year difference in daily mean visits was clear (36.1 vs. 46.5; p < 0.001). Declines were seen in all complaints but device malfunction. In 2020 daily mean visits and admissions decreased from 40.9 and 9.6 before lockdowns to 30.9 (p < 0.001) and 6.9 (p = 0.001) after severe restrictions, respectively. There was a trend towards more negative laboratory parameter profiles in 2020, with patients who visited the EDs after severe restrictions having twice as high median levels of C-reactive protein (15.39 vs. 7.84, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The observed declines in ED visits and admissions were apparent with the significant effect of national lockdowns. Our results indicate that some of the patients requiring urgent medical help did not appear at the ED or came later than they would have done before the pandemic, presenting with more severe complaints