Acute pulmonary embolectomy

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common condition frequently associated with a high mortality worldwide. It can be classified into non-massive, sub-massive and massive, based on the degree of haemodynamic compromise. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy, despite having been in existence for over 100 years, is generally regarded as an option of last resort, with expectedly high mortality rates. Recent advances in diagnosis and recognition of key qualitative predictors of mortality, such as right ventricular stress on echocardiography, have enabled the re-exploration of surgical pulmonary embolectomy for use in patients prior to the development of significant circulatory collapse, with promising results. We aim to review the literature and discuss the indications, perioperative workup and outcomes of surgical pulmonary embolectomy in the management of acute P

Prospective European multicenter randomized trial of PleuraSeal for control of air leaks after elective pulmonary resection

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a synthetic bioresorbable pleural sealant (PleuraSeal; Covidien, Bedford, Mass) to treat air leaks after pulmonary resection. Methods: Patients with air leaks after lung resection were randomized to treatment with pleural sealant on air leak sites after standard methods of lung closure or standard lung closure only. The primary outcome variable was the percentage of patients remaining air leak free until discharge. The secondary outcome variables were the proportion of patients with successful intraoperative air leak sealing, time to last air leak, and durations of chest tube drainage and hospitalization. Results: The sealant group comprised 62 subjects, and the control group comprised 59 subjects. Most patients (98.3%) underwent open lobectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma. The overall success rates for intraoperative air leak sealing were as follows: sealant group, 71.0%; control group, 23.7% (P < .001). For grade 2 and 3 air leaks (n = 77), the intraoperative sealing rates were as follows: sealant group, 71.7%; control group, 9.1% (P < .001). More patients with grade 2 and 3 air leaks had their leaks remain sealed in the sealant group (43.5% vs 15.2%, P = .013). The median time from skin closure to last observable air leak was 6 hours (sealant group) versus 42 hours (control group, P = .718). No treatment-related complications were reported. No differences in drainage or hospitalization were observed. Conclusions: In this multicenter study the pleural sealant was safe and effective treatment for intraoperative air leaks after lung resection. Significantly fewer patients with surgically relevant intraoperative air leaks had postoperative air leaks when the pleural sealant was applied. © 2011 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe