5 research outputs found
Synthesis, Structures, and Photophysical Properties of Ruthenium(II) Quinolinolato Complexes
Reaction of [Ru<sup>II</sup>(PR<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>] with 2-methyl<b>-</b>8-quinolinolate (MeQ)
in the
presence of Et<sub>3</sub>N in MeOH produced the neutral carbonyl
hydrido complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(MeQ)(PR<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(H)] (R = Ph (<b>1</b>), MeC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (<b>2</b>), MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (<b>3</b>)). An analogous
reaction occurs between [Ru<sup>II</sup>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>] and MeQH in ethanol to give [Ru<sup>II</sup>(MeQ)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(CH<sub>3</sub>)] (<b>4</b>). The carbonyl,
hydride, and methyl ligands of these complexes are most likely derived
from the decarbonylation of ROH. Reaction of [Ru<sup>II</sup>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(CO)(H)<sub>2</sub>] with 5-substituted quinolinolato
ligands (XQ, X = H, Cl, Ph) produced the neutral complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(XQ)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(H)] (XQ = Q (<b>5</b>), ClQ (<b>6</b>), PhQ (<b>7</b>)). Treatment
of <b>1</b> and <b>5</b>–<b>7</b> with excess
KCN in MeOH following by metathesis with PPh<sub>4</sub>Cl afforded
PPh<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> salts of the anionic carbonyl dicyano
complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(XQ)(CO)(CN)<sub>2</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>−</sup> (XQ = MeQ (<b>8</b>), Q (<b>9</b>) ClQ (<b>10</b>), PhQ (<b>11</b>)). Under similar conditions,
reaction of <b>1</b> with excess CyNC in the presence of NH<sub>4</sub>PF<sub>6</sub> afforded [Ru<sup>II</sup>(MeQ)(CyNC)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>12</b>). All complexes
have been characterized by IR, ESI/MS, <sup>1</sup>H NMR and elemental
analysis. The crystal structures of complexes <b>3</b>, <b>4</b>, <b>8</b>, and <b>12</b> have been determined
by X-ray crystallography. The UV and emission spectra of these complexes
have also been investigated. All complexes exhibit short-lived quinolinolate-based
LC fluorescence in solution at room temperature and dual emissions
derived from LC fluorescence and phosphorescence at 77 K glassy medium.
These emissions are relatively insensitive to the nature of the ancillary
ligands but are readily tunable by varying the substituents on the
quinolinolato ligand
Synthesis, Structures, and Photophysical Properties of Ruthenium(II) Quinolinolato Complexes
Reaction of [Ru<sup>II</sup>(PR<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>] with 2-methyl<b>-</b>8-quinolinolate (MeQ)
in the
presence of Et<sub>3</sub>N in MeOH produced the neutral carbonyl
hydrido complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(MeQ)(PR<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(H)] (R = Ph (<b>1</b>), MeC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (<b>2</b>), MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> (<b>3</b>)). An analogous
reaction occurs between [Ru<sup>II</sup>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>] and MeQH in ethanol to give [Ru<sup>II</sup>(MeQ)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(CH<sub>3</sub>)] (<b>4</b>). The carbonyl,
hydride, and methyl ligands of these complexes are most likely derived
from the decarbonylation of ROH. Reaction of [Ru<sup>II</sup>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(CO)(H)<sub>2</sub>] with 5-substituted quinolinolato
ligands (XQ, X = H, Cl, Ph) produced the neutral complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(XQ)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(H)] (XQ = Q (<b>5</b>), ClQ (<b>6</b>), PhQ (<b>7</b>)). Treatment
of <b>1</b> and <b>5</b>–<b>7</b> with excess
KCN in MeOH following by metathesis with PPh<sub>4</sub>Cl afforded
PPh<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> salts of the anionic carbonyl dicyano
complexes [Ru<sup>II</sup>(XQ)(CO)(CN)<sub>2</sub>(PPh<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>−</sup> (XQ = MeQ (<b>8</b>), Q (<b>9</b>) ClQ (<b>10</b>), PhQ (<b>11</b>)). Under similar conditions,
reaction of <b>1</b> with excess CyNC in the presence of NH<sub>4</sub>PF<sub>6</sub> afforded [Ru<sup>II</sup>(MeQ)(CyNC)<sub>2</sub>(CO)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> (<b>12</b>). All complexes
have been characterized by IR, ESI/MS, <sup>1</sup>H NMR and elemental
analysis. The crystal structures of complexes <b>3</b>, <b>4</b>, <b>8</b>, and <b>12</b> have been determined
by X-ray crystallography. The UV and emission spectra of these complexes
have also been investigated. All complexes exhibit short-lived quinolinolate-based
LC fluorescence in solution at room temperature and dual emissions
derived from LC fluorescence and phosphorescence at 77 K glassy medium.
These emissions are relatively insensitive to the nature of the ancillary
ligands but are readily tunable by varying the substituents on the
quinolinolato ligand
Dual Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Pathways in Photo- and Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution with Nickel(II) Catalysts Bearing Tetradentate Macrocyclic Ligands
A series of nickel(II) complexes
bearing tetradentate macrocyclic
N<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>3</sub>S, and N<sub>3</sub>P ligands were synthesized,
and their photocatalytic activity toward proton reduction has been
investigated by using [Ir(dF(CF<sub>3</sub>)ppy)<sub>2</sub>(dmbpy)]PF<sub>6</sub> (dF(CF<sub>3</sub>)ppy = 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyridine
and dmbpy = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-dipyridyl) as the photosensitizer
and triethylamine (TEA) as the sacrificial reductant. The complex
[Ni(L4)]<sup>2+</sup> (L4 = 2,12-dimethyl-7-phenyl-3,11,17-triaza-7-phospha-bicyclo[11,3,1]heptadeca-1(17),13,15-triene),
which bears a phosphorus donor atom, shows the highest efficiency
with TON up to 5000 under optimized conditions, while the tetraaza
macrocyclic nickel complexes [Ni(L1)]<sup>2+</sup> and [Ni(L2)]<sup>2+</sup> (L1 = 2,12-dimethyl-3,7,11,17-tetra-azabicyclo[11.3.l]heptadeca-1(17),2,11,13,15-pentaene;
L2 = 2,12-dimethyl-3,7,11,17-tetra-azabicyclo[11.3.l]heptadeca-1(17),13,15-triene)
show lower photocatalytic activities. Transient UV–vis absorption
and spectroelectrochemical experiments show that Ni(II) is reduced
to Ni(I) under photocatalytic conditions. However, dynamic light scattering
and mercury poisoning experiments suggest that the Ni(I) is further
reduced to Ni(0) nanoparticles which are the real catalysts for H<sub>2</sub> production. Electrocatalytic proton reduction by [Ni(L4)]<sup>2+</sup> has also been investigated. In this case, the electrochemical
behavior is consistent with a homogeneous pathway, and no Ni nanoparticles
were observed on the electrode surface during the first few hours
of electrolysis. However, on prolonged electrolysis for >17 h,
nickel-based
nanoparticles were observed on the electrode surface, which are active
catalysts for H<sub>2</sub> production
Light-Driven Reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to CO in Water with a Cobalt Molecular Catalyst and an Organic Sensitizer
We report an efficient visible light-driven CO2 reduction
system that functions in water and without any noble metal nor rare
materials. Using the cobalt complex [Co(qpy)(OH2)2]2+ (1, qpy = 2,2′:6′,2″:6″,2‴-quaterpyridine)
as a catalyst, an organic triazatriangulenium (TATA+) salt as the photosensitizer (PS), BIH + TEOA (BIH = 1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole and TEOA = triethanolamine) as the sacrificial
reductant (SD), CO and formate were first produced with a total TON
>3700 upon irradiation in CO2-saturated CH3CN
solution with visible light. Upon the addition of a weak Brönsted
acid (water), catalysis was enhanced and directed toward CO production
(19,000 TON, 93% selectivity). The photocatalytic system was further
shown to function in pure water as a solvent. High metrics with a
TON for CO of 2600 and 94% selectivity were obtained using TEA (triethylamine)
as the SD
Slow Magnetic Relaxation in a Series of Mononuclear 8‑Coordinate Fe(II) and Co(II) Complexes
A series of homoleptic
mononuclear 8-coordinate Fe<sup>II</sup> and Co<sup>II</sup> compounds,
[Fe<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>2</b>), [Fe<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><sup><b>3</b></sup>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>3</b>), [Fe<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><sup><b>4</b></sup>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>), [Co<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><sup><b>1</b></sup>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>5</b>), [Co<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>6</b>), [Co<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><sup><b>3</b></sup>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>7</b>), and [Co<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><sup><b>4</b></sup>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>8</b>) (<b>L</b><sup><b>1</b></sup> and <b>L</b><sup><b>2</b></sup> are 2,9-dialkylcarboxylate-1,10-phenanthroline
ligands; <b>L</b><sup><b>3</b></sup> and <b>L</b><sup><b>4</b></sup> are 6,6′-dialkylcarboxylate-2,2′-bipyridine
ligands), have been obtained, and their crystal structures have been
determined by X-ray crystallography. The metal center in all of these
compounds has an oversaturated coordination number of 8, which is
completed by two neutral homoleptic tetradentate ligands and is unconventional
in 3d-metal compounds. These compounds are further characterized by
electronic spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry (CV), and magnetic measurements.
CV measurements of these complexes in MeCN solution exhibit rich redox
properties. Magnetic measurements on these compounds demonstrate that
the observed single-ion magnetic (SIM) behavior in the previously
reported [Fe<sup>II</sup>(<b>L</b><b><sup>1</sup></b>)<sub>2</sub>](ClO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) is not a contingent
case, since all of the 8-coordinate compounds <b>2</b>–<b>8</b> exhibit interesting slow magnetic relaxation under applied
direct current fields