Defining a Minimum Set of Standardized Patient-centered Outcome Measures for Macular Degeneration

Purpose To define a minimum set of outcome measures for tracking, comparing, and improving macular degeneration care. Design Recommendations from a working group of international experts in macular degeneration outcomes registry development and patient advocates, facilitated by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM). Methods Modified Delphi technique, supported by structured teleconferences, followed by online surveys to drive consensus decisions. Potential outcomes were identified through literature review of outcomes collected in existing registries and reported in major clinical trials. Outcomes were refined by the working group and selected based on impact on patients, relationship to good clinical care, and feasibility of measurement in routine clinical practice. Results Standardized measurement of the following outcomes is recommended: visual functioning and quality of life (distance visual acuity, mobility and independence, emotional well-being, reading and accessing information); number of treatments; complications of treatment; and disease control. Proposed data collection sources include administrative data, clinical data during routine clinical visits, and patient-reported sources annually. Recording the following clinical characteristics is recommended to enable risk adjustment: age; sex; ethnicity; smoking status; baseline visual acuity in both eyes; type of macular degeneration; presence of geographic atrophy, subretinal fibrosis, or pigment epithelial detachment; previous macular degeneration treatment; ocular comorbidities. Conclusions The recommended minimum outcomes and pragmatic reporting standards should enable standardized, meaningful assessments and comparisons of macular degeneration treatment outcomes. Adoption could accelerate global improvements in standardized data gathering and reporting of patient-centered outcomes. This can facilitate informed decisions by patients and health care providers, plus allow long-term monitoring of aggregate data, ultimately improving understanding of disease progression and treatment responses

Highlights from the 2019 International Myopia Summit on 'controversies in myopia'.

Myopia is an emerging public health issue with potentially significant economic and social impact, especially in East Asia. However, many uncertainties about myopia and its clinical management remain. The International Myopia Summit workgroup was convened by the Singapore Eye Research Institute, the WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific and the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness in 2019. The aim of this workgroup was to summarise available evidence, identify gaps or unmet needs and provide consensus on future directions for clinical research in myopia. In this review, among the many 'controversies in myopia' discussed, we highlight three main areas of consensus. First, development of interventions for the prevention of axial elongation and pathologic myopia is needed, which may require a multifaceted approach targeting the Bruch's membrane, choroid and/or sclera. Second, clinical myopia management requires co-operation between optometrists and ophthalmologists to provide patients with holistic care and a tailored approach that balances risks and benefits of treatment by using optical and pharmacological interventions. Third, current diagnostic technologies to detect myopic complications may be improved through collaboration between clinicians, researchers and industry. There is an unmet need to develop new imaging modalities for both structural and functional analyses and to establish normative databases for myopic eyes. In conclusion, the workgroup's call to action advocated for a paradigm shift towards a collaborative approach in the holistic clinical management of myopia

Genetic variants linked to myopic macular degeneration in persons with high myopia: CREAM Consortium

Purpose To evaluate the roles of known myopia-associated genetic variants for development of myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in individuals with high myopia (HM), using case-control studies from the Consortium of Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM). Methods A candidate gene approach tested 50 myopia-associated loci for association with HM and MMD, using meta-analyses of case-control studies comprising subjects of European and Asian ancestry aged 30 to 80 years from 10 studies. Fifty loci with the strongest associations with myopia were chosen from a previous published GWAS study. Highly myopic (spherical equivalent [SE] -5.0 diopters [D]) cases with MMD (N = 348), and two sets of controls were enrolled: (1) the first set included 16,275 emmetropes (SE -0.5 D); and (2) second set included 898 highly myopic subjects (SE -5.0 D) without MMD. MMD was classified based on the International photographic classification for pathologic myopia (META-PM). Results In the first analysis, comprising highly myopic cases with MMD (N = 348) versus emmetropic controls without MMD (N = 16,275), two SNPs were significantly associated with high myopia in adults with HM and MMD: (1) rs10824518 (P = 6.20E-07) in KCNMA1, which is highly expressed in human retinal and scleral tissues; and (2) rs524952 (P = 2.32E-16) near GJD2. In the second analysis, comprising highly myopic cases with MMD (N = 348) versus highly myopic controls without MMD (N = 898), none of the SNPs studied reached Bonferroni-corrected significance. Conclusions Of the 50 myopia-associated loci, we did not find any variant specifically associated with MMD, but the KCNMA1 and GJD2 loci were significantly associated with HM in highly myopic subjects with MMD, compared to emmetropes

Comparison of Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration Subtypes in Japanese and French Patients: Multicenter Diagnosis With Multimodal Imaging

10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.004American Journal of OphthalmologyAJOP

Potential for Treatment Interval Extension in Eyes with nAMD Disease Activity Post Loading Phase in HAWK and HARRIER

Abstract Introduction The HAWK and HARRIER studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Based on the study design, brolucizumab-treated eyes adjusted to a q8w regimen because the presence of disease activity (DA) at the end of the matched loading phase (Week 16) could not subsequently extend to a q12w interval. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess subsequent DA in this subgroup to determine the potential for interval extensions during the first year of treatment. Methods Pooled data from the brolucizumab 6 mg arms and aflibercept arms of HAWK and HARRIER were included. Presence of DA was determined by the masked investigator based on their assessment of functional and anatomical parameters measured by optical coherence tomography. DA was compared at DA assessments, conducted at Weeks 16, 20, 32, and 44; fluid was also assessed at the primary analysis at Week 48. Results Fewer brolucizumab- (22.8%) than aflibercept-treated (32.2%) eyes had DA at the first DA assessment at Week 16. In eyes with investigator-identified DA at Week 16, BCVA change from baseline to Week 96 was comparable between treatment arms. Fewer brolucizumab- than aflibercept-treated eyes had DA at each subsequent DA assessment in Year 1: 31.8% vs 39.1% (Week 20), 27.3% vs 43.5% (Week 32), and 17.3% vs 31.2% (Week 44). Fewer eyes treated with brolucizumab than aflibercept had intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid: 35.3% vs 43.5% (Week 20), 55.8% vs 69.6% (Week 32), 30.0% vs 43.1% (Week 44), and 48.6% vs 68.6% (Week 48). Conclusion These findings indicate that, in eyes that still had DA 8 weeks after the final dose of loading phase, brolucizumab-treated eyes had improved fluid resolution and higher potential for treatment interval extension than aflibercept-treated eyes during the first year of treatment

Real-world effectiveness and safety of ranibizumab for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization: Results from the LUMINOUS study

Purpose To assess the 1-year effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns of ranibizumab in patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) enrolled in the LUMINOUS study. Methods This 5-year, prospective, multicenter, observational, study enrolled 30,138 patients across all approved ranibizumab indications from outpatient ophthalmology clinics. 297 consenting patients ( 6518 years) with mCNV who were treatment-na\uefve or prior-treated with ranibizumab or other ocular treatments were enrolled, and treated with ranibizumab according to the local product label. The main outcomes are visual acuity (VA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters or equivalent), adverse events during the study, and treatment exposure over 1 year. Results are presented by prior treatment status of the study eye and injection frequency. Results Of the 297 mCNV patients recruited in the study, 108 were treatment-na\uefve and 175 were prior ranibizumab-treated. At baseline, the mean age of patients was 57.6 years, and 59.0 years and 80.6% and 65.7% were female in the treatment-na\uefve and prior ranibizumab-treated groups, respectively. Most were Caucasian (treatment-na\uefve, 88.9%; prior ranibizumab-treated, 86.9%). The mean (\ub1standard deviation [SD]) VA letter changes to 1 year were +9.7 (\ub117.99) from 49.5 (\ub120.51) and +1.5 (\ub113.15) from 58.5 (\ub119.79) and these were achieved with a mean (SD) of 3.0 (\ub11.58) and 2.6 (\ub12.33) injections in the treatment-na\uefve and prior ranibizumab-treated groups, respectively. Presented by injection frequencies 1\u20132, 3\u20134 and 655 injections in Year 1, the mean (SD) VA changes were +15.0 (\ub114.70), +7.7 (\ub119.91) and 120.7 (\ub116.05) in treatment-na\uefve patients and +1.5 (\ub114.57), +3.1 (\ub111.53) and 123.6 (\ub111.97) in prior ranibizumab-treated patients, respectively. The safety profile was comparable with previous ranibizumab studies. Conclusions Ranibizumab treatment for mCNV showed robust VA gains in treatment-na\uefve patients and VA maintenance in prior ranibizumab-treated patients in a clinical practice setting, consisting mainly of Caucasians. No new safety signals were observed during the study

Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Review, Guidance, and Consensus Statement on Management.

TOPIC The aim of this article is to review and compile available information on the classification, pathophysiology, and clinical features of myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV); to describe the latest data on the management of this disease; and to present guidance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE In the United States, myopia affects approximately 34 million people (2010), and similar figures have been reported in Europe. Pathologic myopia (PM), a possible consequence of myopia, is estimated to affect up to 3% of the global population. One of the most serious complications of PM is myopic CNV, which often leads to a sudden onset but progressive decline in central vision and is associated with a poor prognosis unless treated. Furthermore, 35% of patients with myopic CNV develop bilateral disease in the fellow eye within 8 years. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies have had a major impact on the management of patients with myopic CNV, there remain significant gaps in our understanding of this condition and how to best administer treatment. Additionally, the long-term safety and efficacy of these treatments are largely unknown. METHODS We carried out a literature review (September 2015) of all English-language articles in PubMed resulting from searches of the following terms: "choroidal neovascularization" AND "myopia" OR "myopic macular degeneration" OR "degenerative myopia" OR "myopic maculopathy" OR "myopic retinopathy" OR "pathological myopia" OR "pathologic myopia." RESULTS We screened a total of 566 abstracts, and 250 articles were deemed relevant for full publication review. We excluded a further 71, but an additional 44 articles were identified. This resulted in 223 articles being used to develop this review. CONCLUSIONS Highly myopic patients experiencing a sudden loss of central vision should be referred for further examination. Once a diagnosis of myopic CNV has been confirmed, after fluorescein angiography, treatment initiation should be prompt and anti-VEGF agents considered as first-line therapy, unless contraindicated. Continued monitoring of patients is required to assess any progression or recurrence of the condition

Erratum to: Targeting key angiogenic pathways with a bispecific CrossMAb optimized for neovascular eye diseases (EMBO Molecular Medicine, (2016), 8, 11, (1265-1288), 10.15252/emmm.201505889)

10.15252/emmm.201707895EMBO Molecular Medicine9798

Targeting key angiogenic pathways with a bispecific CrossMAb optimized for neovascular eye diseases

Anti-angiogenic therapies using biological molecules that neutralize vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) have revolutionized treatment of retinal vascular diseases including age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study reports preclinical assessment of a strategy to enhance anti-VEGF-A monotherapy efficacy by targeting both VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2), a factor strongly upregulated in vitreous fluids of patients with retinal vascular disease and exerting some of its activities in concert with VEGF-A. Simultaneous VEGF-A and ANG-2 inhibition was found to reduce vessel lesion number, permeability, retinal edema, and neuron loss more effectively than either agent alone in a spontaneous choroidal neovascularization (CNV) model. We describe the generation of a bispecific domain-exchanged (crossed) monoclonal antibody (CrossMAb; RG7716) capable of binding, neutralizing, and depleting VEGF-A and ANG-2. RG7716 showed greater efficacy than anti-VEGF-A alone in a non-human primate laser-induced CNV model after intravitreal delivery. Modification of RG7716’s FcRn and FccR binding sites disabled the antibodies’ Fc-mediated effector functions. This resulted in increased systemic, but not ocular, clearance. These properties make RG7716 a potential nextgeneration therapy for neovascular indications of the eye

Clinical impact of the worldwide shortage of verteporfin (Visudyne®) on ophthalmic care

INTRODUCTION: Since July 2021, a worldwide shortage of verteporfin (Visudyne®) occurred: an essential medicine required for photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT with verteporfin has a broad range of indications in ophthalmology, including chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and choroidal haemangioma. For these disorders, PDT is either the first-choice treatment or regarded as a major treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to key opinion leaders in the field of medical retina throughout the world, to assess the role of PDT in their country and the effects of the shortage of verteporfin. In addition, information on the application of alternative treatments during shortage of verteporfin was obtained, to further assess the impact of the shortage. RESULTS: Our questionnaire indicated that the shortage of verteporfin had a major impact on ophthalmic care worldwide and was regarded to be a serious problem by most of our respondents. However, even though there is ample evidence to support the use of PDT in several chorioretinal diseases, we found notable differences in its use in normal patient care throughout the world. Various alternative management strategies were noted during the verteporfin shortage, including lowering the dose of verteporfin per patient, the use of alternative treatment strategies and the use of a centralized system for allocating the remaining ampoules of verteporfin in some countries. CONCLUSION: The shortage of verteporfin has had a large effect on the care of ophthalmic patients across the world and may have resulted in significant and irreversible vision loss. Mitigation strategies should be developed in consultation with all stakeholders to avoid future medication shortages of verteporfin and other unique ophthalmic medications. These strategies may include mandatory stock keeping, compulsory licensing to an alternative manufacturer or incentivizing the development of competition, for example through novel public-private partnerships