Reactivation of BK polyomavirus during pregnancy, vertical transmission, and clinical significance: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown conflicting results on the prevalence and the risks of BK reactivation among pregnant women. In addition, the prevalence of vertical transmission and its clinical significance during pregnancy are not well studied. OBJECTIVES: The study\u27s aims were (1) to investigate the prevalence, and (2) to assess the risk of BK Polyomavirus reactivation and its clinical significance in pregnant women and fetuses. STUDY DESIGN: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database from inception through May 31, 2017. We included studies that reported prevalence, relative risks, odds ratios, or hazard ratios of BK Polyomavirus reactivation during pregnancy. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were calculated using a random-effect model. The protocol for this study is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42017063919). RESULTS: 17 observational studies with a total of 2553 pregnant women were enrolled. The estimated prevalence of BK seropositivity and BK in urine (viruria) among pregnant women were 79.2% (95%CI: 69.6%-86.4%) and 18.9% (95%CI: 10.4%-31.8%). When compared to non-pregnant women, the pooled ORs of BK seropositivity and BK viruria in pregnant women were 1.84 (95%CI: 1.05-3.22) and 6.02 (95%CI: 2.43-14.92), respectively. The estimated prevalence of positive BK-specific IgM antibody in cord blood was 4.9% (95%CI: 0.5%-36.2%). The data on the fetal effects of BK virus were limited. Although BK was detected in fetal organs, available data suggested no association between BK infection and adverse consequences such as miscarriage during pregnancy or childhood malignancy. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrates a significantly increased risk of BK Polyomavirus reactivation during pregnancy. Although vertical transmission can occur with an overall estimated prevalence of 4.9%, there are currently no data suggesting harm to pregnant women and fetuses from BK Polyomavirus

Vitamin D for the Immune System in Cystic Fibrosis (DISC): A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Background Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have increased risk of vitamin D deficiency owing to fat malabsorption and other factors. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased risk of pulmonary exacerbations of CF. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to examine the impact of a single high-dose bolus of vitamin D 3 followed by maintenance treatment given to adults with CF during an acute pulmonary exacerbation on future recurrence of pulmonary exacerbations. Methods This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, intent-to-treat clinical trial. Subjects with CF were randomly assigned to oral vitamin D 3 given as a single dose of 250,000 International Units (IU) or to placebo within 72 h of hospital admission for an acute pulmonary exacerbation, followed by 50,000 IU of vitamin D 3 or an identically matched placebo pill taken orally every other week starting at 3 mo after random assignment. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of the time to next pulmonary exacerbation or death within 1 y. The secondary outcomes included circulating concentrations of the antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin and recovery of lung function as assessed by the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%). Results A total of 91 subjects were enrolled in the study. There were no differences between the vitamin D 3 and placebo groups in time to next pulmonary exacerbation or death at 1 y. In addition, there were no differences in serial recovery of lung function after pulmonary exacerbation by FEV1% or in serial concentrations of plasma cathelicidin. Conclusions Vitamin D 3 initially given at the time of pulmonary exacerbation of CF did not alter the time to the next pulmonary exacerbation, 12-mo mortality, serial lung function, or serial plasma cathelicidin concentrations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01426256.Supported by Cystic Fibrosis Foundation grants TANGPR11A0 (to VT) and JOSEPH15YO (to PMJ) and NIH grants UL1 TR000454 (Emory CTSA), UL1 TR000165 (UAB CTSA), T32 DK007298 (to JAA), T32 DK007734 (to ESM), K24 DK096574 (to TRZ), and K01 DK102851 (to JAA).Scopu