Gender differences in renal responses to hyperglycemia and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetes

Gender differences in renal responses to hyperglycemia and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetes.BackgroundDiabetes mellitus reduces female gender-mediated protection against progression of renal disease but the mechanisms responsible for this loss of protection are unknown. The impact of gender on the diabetic hyperfiltration state has not previously been studied. Since hyperfiltration is a factor in the development of diabetic renal disease, and is influenced by hyperglycemia and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade, we examined gender differences in the renal response to hyperglycemia and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in young males and females with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus.MethodsTen male and 12 female normoalbuminuric, normotensive, adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus were studied before ACE inhibition during clamped euglycemia and hyperglycemia, and then after 21 days treatment with enalapril (0.1 mg/kg daily × 1 week and then 0.1 mg/kg twice a day × 2 weeks).ResultsDuring clamped euglycemia, males exhibited significantly higher effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and renal blood flow (RBF) and a lower renal vascular resistance (RVR). During clamped hyperglycemia, females exhibited reductions in ERPF and RBF, and increased RVR and filtration fraction (FF). Males exhibited no significant renal hemodynamic changes during hyperglycemia. After ACE inhibition treatment, both genders exhibited significant declines in arterial pressure, but only females displayed a reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and FF.ConclusionThe renal responses to hyperglycemia and ACE inhibition appear to differ between male and female adolescents with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus. Hyperglycemia-induced changes in RVR and FF in women may account, at least in part, for the loss of gender-based protection in diabetic renal disease

Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the soluble guanylyl cyclase activator BI 685509 in patients with diabetic kidney disease:A randomized trial

Aims: Albuminuria is associated with abnormalities in the nitric oxide (NO)–soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC)–cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway. We assessed safety and efficacy of the NO-independent sGC activator BI 685509 in patients with diabetic kidney disease and albuminuria. Materials and methods: In this Phase Ib trial (NCT03165227), we randomized patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 20–75 mL/min/1.73 m2 and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) 200–3500 mg/g to oral BI 685509 (1 mg three times daily, n = 20; 3 mg once daily, n = 19; 3 mg three times daily, n = 20, after final titration) or placebo (n = 15) for 28 days. Changes from baseline in UACR in first morning void (UACRFMV) and 10-hour (UACR10h) urine (3 mg once daily/three times daily only) were assessed. Results: Baseline median eGFR and UACR were 47.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 641.5 mg/g, respectively. Twelve patients had drug-related adverse events (AEs; 16.2%: BI 685509, n = 9; placebo, n = 3), most frequently hypotension (4.1%: BI 685509, n = 2; placebo, n = 1) and diarrhoea (2.7%: BI 685509, n = 2; placebo, n = 0). Four patients experienced AEs leading to study discontinuation (5.4%: BI 685509, n = 3; placebo, n = 1). Placebo-corrected mean UACRFMV decreased from baseline in the 3-mg once-daily (28.8%, P = 0.23) and three-times-daily groups (10.2%, P = 0.71) and increased in the 1-mg three-times-daily group (6.6%, P = 0.82); changes were not significant. UACR10h decreased by 35.3% (3 mg once daily, P = 0.34) and 56.7% (3 mg three times daily, P = 0.09); ≥50.0% of patients (UACR10h 3 mg once daily/three times daily) responded (≥20% UACR decrease from baseline). Conclusions: BI 685509 was generally well tolerated. Effects on UACR lowering merit further investigation.</p

The dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse outcomes in chronic kidney disease (DAPA-CKD) trial: baseline characteristics

Background: The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease (DAPA-CKD; NCT03036150) trial was designed to assess the effect of the sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on kidney and cardiovascular events in participants with CKD with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D). This analysis reports the baseline characteristics of those recruited, comparing them with those enrolled in other trials. Methods: In DAPA-CKD, 4304 participants with a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥200 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 25 and 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo. Mean eGFR was 43.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 and median UACR was 949 mg/g (108 mg/mmol). Results: Overall, 2906 participants (68%) had a diagnosis of T2D and of these, 396 had CKD ascribed to a cause other than diabetes. The most common causes of CKD after diabetes (n = 2510) were ischaemic/hypertensive nephropathy (n = 687) and chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 695), of which immunoglobulin A nephropathy (n = 270) was the most common. A total of 4174 participants (97%) were receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, 1882 (43.7%) diuretics, 229 (5.3%) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and 122 (2.8%) glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. In contrast to the Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE), the DAPA-CKD trial enrolled participants with CKD due to diabetes and to causes other than diabetes. The mean eGFR of participants in the DAPA-CKD trial was 13.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower than in CREDENCE, similar to that in the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in DKD (FIDELIO-DKD) trial and the Study Of diabetic Nephropathy with AtRasentan (SONAR). Conclusions: Participants with a wide range of underlying kidney diseases receiving renin–angiotensin system blocking therapy have been enrolled in the DAPA-CKD trial. The trial will examine the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in participants with CKD Stages 2–4 and increased albuminuria, with and without T2D

Gradient of Risk and Associations With Cardiovascular Efficacy of Ertugliflozin by Measures of Kidney Function Observations From VERTIS CV

Ukraine: Olga Godlevska, Ivan Chopey, Zinaida Teliatnikova, Petro Kuskalo, Orest Abrahamovych, Borys Mankovskyi, Ivan Fushtey, Galyna Myshanych, Susanna Tykhonova, Vira Tseluyko, Olena Koval, Oleksandr Parkhomenko, Oleksandr Prokhorov, Myroslava Vayda, Larysa Martymianova, Viktoriia Zharinova, Lyudmyla Prystupa, Larysa Pererva, Oleksandr Kovalov, Lyubov Sokolova, Volodymyr Botsyurko, Vitaliy Maslyanko, Maryna Vlasenko, Tetyana Khomazyuk, Anna Kulyk, Volodymyr Synenko, Oleksandr Karpenko, Yuriy Mostovoy, Olga Gyrina, Maryna Dolzhenko, Oleksandra Donets, Inna Sorokina, Yaroslav Malynovsky, Olena Lysunets, Roman Petrovskyy, Svitlana Panina

Ertugliflozin and Slope of Chronic eGFR: Prespecified Analyses from the Randomized VERTIS CV Trial

Background and objectives A reduction in the rate of eGFR decline, with preservation of $0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, has been proposed as a surrogate for kidney disease progression. We report results from prespecified analyses assessing effects of ertugliflozin versus placebo on eGFR slope from the eValuation of ERTugliflozin effIcacy and Safety CardioVascular outcomes (VERTIS CV) trial (NCT01986881). Design, setting, participants, & measurements Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomized to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg, and ertugliflozin 15 mg (1:1:1). The analyses compared the effect of ertugliflozin (pooled doses, n55499) versus placebo (n52747) on eGFR slope per week and per year by random coefficient models. Study periods (weeks 0–6 and weeks 6–52) and total and chronic slopes (week 0 or week 6 to weeks 104, 156, 208, and 260) were modeled separately and by baseline kidney status. Results In the overall population, for weeks 0–6, the least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per week [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]) were 20.07 (20.16 to 0.03) and 20.54 (20.61 to 20.48) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was 20.47 (20.59 to 20.36). During weeks 6–52, least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI]) were 20.12 (20.70 to 0.46) and 1.62 (1.21 to 2.02) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was 1.74 (1.03 to 2.45). For weeks 6–156, least squares mean eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year [95% CI]) were 21.51 (21.70 to 21.32) and 20.32 (20.45 to 20.19) for the placebo and ertugliflozin groups, respectively; the difference was 1.19 (0.95 to 1.42). During weeks 0–156, the placebo-adjusted difference in least squares mean slope was 1.06 (0.85 to 1.27). These findings were consistent by baseline kidney status. Conclusions Ertugliflozin has a favorable placebo-adjusted eGFR slope .0.75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year, documenting the kidney function preservation underlying the clinical benefits of ertugliflozin on kidney disease progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: US National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01986881. Date of trial registration: November 13, 2013

The metabolodiuretic promise of sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition: the search for the sweet spot in heart failure

Clinical trials often yield surprising results, and in the contemporary era, undoubtedly, the Empagliflozin Removal of Excess of Glucose Outcome (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) trial stands out as one such example.1,2 No one could have predicted that a sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, which works to promote urinary glucose excretion as a treatment approach to hyperglycemia, would cut all-cause mortality by about one-third in patients with type 2 diabetes. Just as surprising were the observations that the reductions in mortality were possibly driven by a reduction in heart failure as opposed to atherothrombotic events. Despite these salutary clinical effects, the physiological mechanisms responsible for these benefits are not yet known. The time frame of the effect precludes a glucose-mediated effect, and furthermore, many other equally or more effective antihyperglycemic therapies are not associated with reduced heart failure. The remarkable renal benefits noted in the trial were also surprising.2 Because the glycosuric effects of SGLT2 inhibition are dependent on the amount of filtered glucose and therefore diminished in participants with low glomerular filtration rate, it was surprising to note that treatment with empagliflozin resulted in a marked approximately 40% reduction in proteinuria and doubling of serum creatinine in the absence of marked differences in glycemia. While the scientific community struggles to understand the biologic basis and clinical implications of these observations, several questions related to EMPA-REG OUTCOME have come into focus: can SGLT2 inhibitors be used to treat heart failure as opposed to prevent heart failure in diabetes? Can SGLT2 inhibitors be a treatment for heart failure in patients without type 2 diabetes? It is also tempting to ask whether SGLT2 inhibitors will emerge as primary renoprotective strategies irrespective of glycemic or baseline renal status