Renal Replacement Therapy and Incremental Hemodialysis for Veterans with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

Each year approximately 13,000 Veterans transition to maintenance dialysis, mostly in the traditional form of thrice-weekly hemodialysis from the start. Among >6000 dialysis units nationwide, there are currently approximately 70 Veterans Affairs (VA) dialysis centers. Given this number of VA dialysis centers and their limited capacity, only 10% of all incident dialysis Veterans initiate treatment in a VA center. Evidence suggests that, among Veterans, the receipt of care within the VA system is associated with favorable outcomes, potentially because of the enhanced access to healthcare resources. Data from the United States Renal Data System Special Study Center "Transition-of-Care-in-CKD" suggest that Veterans who receive dialysis in a VA unit exhibit greater survival compared with the non-VA centers. Substantial financial expenditures arise from the high volume of outsourced care and higher dialysis reimbursement paid by the VA than by Medicare to outsourced providers. Given the exceedingly high mortality and abrupt decline in residual kidney function (RKF) in the first dialysis year, it is possible that incremental transition to dialysis through an initial twice-weekly hemodialysis regimen might preserve RKF, prolong vascular access longevity, improve patients' quality of life, and be a more patient-centered approach, more consistent with "personalized" dialysis. Broad implementation of incremental dialysis might also result in more Veterans receiving care within a VA dialysis unit. Controlled trials are needed to examine the safety and efficacy of incremental hemodialysis in Veterans and other populations; the administrative and health care as well as provider structure within the VA system would facilitate the performance of such trials

Pain and Kidney Function Decline and Mortality: A Cohort Study of US Veterans.

BackgroundChronic pain is a common condition in the general population. However, large epidemiologic studies examining the role of pain in the deterioration of kidney function, development of chronic kidney disease, and risk for death are lacking.Study designRetrospective cohort study.Setting & participantsA nationally representative cohort of 2,360,056 US veterans with baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) ≥ 60mL/min/1.73m(2), followed up from October 2004 to September 2006.Predictor4 pain categories were compared: none (score, 0), mild (1-4), moderate (5-6), or severe (≥7).OutcomeseGFR decline (determined by eGFR slope) and combined incident eGFR<60mL/min/1.73m(2) or all-cause death.MeasurementsWe examined the pain management pattern and association of reported pain with (1) rapid eGFR decline and (2) a composite outcome of incident eGFR<60mL/min/1.73m(2) or all-cause death using logistic regression and Cox models adjusted for baseline eGFR, demographics, comorbid conditions, cardiovascular risk factors, and depression.Results∼60% of veterans reported pain of any severity during the baseline period. The most commonly prescribed analgesics were opioids. In a dose-response relationship, veterans reporting moderate or severe pain had a higher risk for faster eGFR decline compared with those reporting none (ORs of 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.14] and 1.17 [95% CI, 1.13-1.21] for moderate and severe pain, respectively). In combined analyses, veterans reporting moderate or severe pain both had 30% higher risk of the combined outcome (incident eGFR, 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or death) compared with those reporting none (HRs of 1.30 [95% CI, 1.28-1.31] and 1.30 [95% CI, 1.28-1.32] for moderate and severe pain, respectively).LimitationsLack of granular data regarding type and location of pain.ConclusionsWe observed a high prevalence of pain and analgesic prescription in the US veteran population with normal eGFRs. Pain was associated with a higher incidence of eGFRs<60mL/min/1.73m(2), faster kidney function decline, and higher mortality

The Obesity Paradox in Kidney Disease: How to Reconcile it with Obesity Management.

Obesity, a risk factor for de novo chronic kidney disease (CKD), confers survival advantages in advanced CKD. This so-called obesity paradox is the archetype of the reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risks, in addition to the lipid, blood pressure, adiponectin, homocysteine, and uric acid paradoxes. These paradoxical phenomena are in sharp contradistinction to the known epidemiology of cardiovascular risks in the general population. In addition to advanced CKD, the obesity paradox has also been observed in heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, liver cirrhosis, and metastatic cancer, as well as in the elderly. These are populations in whom protein-energy wasting and inflammation are strong predictors of early death. Both larger muscle mass and higher body fat provide longevity in these patients, whereas thinner body habitus and weight loss are associated with higher mortality. Muscle mass appears to be superior to body fat in conferring an even greater survival. The obesity paradox may be the result of a time discrepancy between competing risk factors, i.e., overnutrition as the long-term killer versus undernutrition as the short-term killer. Hemodynamic stability of obesity, lipoprotein defense against circulating endotoxins, protective cytokine profiles, toxin sequestration of fat mass, and antioxidation of muscle may play important roles. Despite claims that obesity paradox is a statistical fallacy and a result of residual confounding, the consistency of data and other causality clues suggest a high biologic plausibility. Examining the causes and consequences of the obesity paradox may help discover important pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to improved outcomes in patients with CKD