9 research outputs found

    Detection of recombination mediated by phiC31-int between an <i>attB</i> site contained into a NILV and a genomic <i>attP</i> site.

    No full text
    <p>A) Scheme of the DsRed2 PCR before and after the enzymatic restriction treatment. B) PCR DsRed2 results without restriction enzyme treatment. Lanes 1 to 3: cotransduction with CMV-Neo and CMV-PhiC31 increasing vector input of 50–150–300 ng of p24. Lanes 4 to 6: cotransduction with <i>attB</i>-CMV-Neo and CMV-PhiC31 increasing vector input of 50–150–300 ng of p24. Lane 7: <i>attB</i>-CMV-Neo. Lane 8: positive control generated by triple-transfection (CMV-phiC31-int, <i>attB</i>-CMV-Neo and CMV-<i>attP</i>-DsRed2). Lane 9: negative control without vector. Lane 10: negative control of PCR. C) PCR DsRed2 results after restriction enzyme treatment. Lanes are similar to figure B. D) Nested PCR from the product isolated from lane 6 to confirm the specificity of PCR DsRed2 amplification.</p

    Analysis strategies to detect the specific integrations mediated by phiC31-int.

    No full text
    <p>A) Illustration of the three mechanisms of the phiC31-int mediated integration of a NILV containing an <i>attB</i> sequence. According to the type of integration, the PCR results in three different profiles: - PCRs LTR+/<i>attB</i>− : integration type (1), specific integration. - PCRs LTR−/<i>attB</i>+: integration type (2), residual integration. - PCRs LTR+/<i>attB</i>+: integration type (3), illegitimate integration. P1/P1′ are the primers used for <i>attB</i> PCR and P2/P2′ are the primers used for LTR PCR. B) Schematic representations of the inverse PCR and the adapted inverse PCR strategies used to characterize phiC31-int integration sites.</p

    Effect of NLS sequence on phiC31-int activity in NILV context.

    No full text
    <p>A) Cotransduction of NILVs CMV-PhiC31 and CMV-Neo or <i>attB</i>-CMV-Neo. Four p24 doses of PhiC31 vector were used (D1: 3 ng, D2: 5 ng, D3: 10 ng, D4: 33 ng). B) Cotransduction of NILVs CMV-PhiC31-NLS and CMV-Neo or <i>attB</i>-CMV-Neo. Four p24 doses of PhiC31 vector were used (D1: 3 ng, D2: 5 ng, D3: 10 ng, D4: 33 ng). No significant differences are observed between sample with or without a<i>ttB</i> sequence in the vector pTRIP-CMV-Neo. Satistics: two ways ANOVA with Bonferroni posttest (Prism 5).</p

    Scheme of phiC31-int mediated recombination in bacterial host.

    No full text
    <p>PhiC31 integrase performs precise recombination between an <i>attB</i> site located in the <i>Streptomyces</i> genome and an <i>attP</i> site located on the phiC31 phage genome. The outcome is integration of the phage into the host genome.</p

    Analysis of cell lines which constitutively expressed phiC31-int.

    No full text
    <p>A) PhiC31 RT-PCR on three different cell lines. HFi and Hi16 are derived from Hela cell line and TC1 from NIH-3T3 cell line. Control condition lane lacks RNA. B) PCR which detects LTR junctions or intact <i>attB</i> sites after transduction with a NILV <i>attB</i>-CMV-Neo.</p

    DNA sequence of <i>att</i> and p<i>attP</i> sites.

    No full text
    <p>A) Wild type <i>attP</i> and <i>attB</i> sites. After recombination two hybrids sites are formed: <i>attL</i> and <i>attR</i>. B) Recombination between <i>attB</i> site and the human locus Xq22.1 This recombination generates a p<i>attR</i> which has been isolated by inverse PCR. Xq22.1 had been described previously as a human p<i>attP</i> by MP Calos et al., who isolated the same p<i>attR</i>.</p

    Hypothetical model to explain the inversion of 4.8

    No full text
    <p>Step 1: Integration of a NILV mediated by phiC31-int into a p<i>attP</i> site. Step2: Recombination mediated by phiC31-int between the p<i>attL</i> generated during step 1 and another p<i>att</i> site located at 4 kb.</p
    corecore