3 research outputs found

    A comparative study of URANS, DDES and DES simulations of Jetstream 31 aircraft near the compressibility limit

    Get PDF
    This work presents a comparative study of Unsteady Reynolds–Averaged Navier– Stokes (URANS), Detached Eddy Simulations (DES) and Delayed Detached Eddy Simulations (DDES) turbulence modeling approaches by performing numerical investigation with the ANSYS-FLUENT software package on a full-scale model of the Jetstream 31 aircraft. The lift and drag coefficients obtained from different models are compared with flight test data, wind tunnel data and theoretical estimates. The different turbulence models are also compared with each other on the basis of pressure coefficient distributions and velocity fluctuations along various lines and sections of the aircraft. For the mesh and the conditions presented in this study, the DDES Spalart–Allmaras model gives the best overall results.Cranfield University: EEB6001

    Comparison of Flow field in the proximity of A Single Planar & Wrap-around Fin

    Get PDF
    Abstract This paper analyses the results of the computational analysis between a single planar and a wrap-around fin mounted on a semi-cylindrical body. A free-stream Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model was simulated for both cases in the Mach 0.4-3.0M range at 0°Angle of attack, in which, the behavior of flow around the fin was investigated using a turbulence model of higher order discretization. The post-processing shows all the possible views of the flow dynamics around the fins, as well as the missile body. The aerodynamic drag and the rolling moment characteristics of the planar and the wrap-around fin have been compared and adequate validation has been performed for the current missile model. This work forms a preliminary step in turbulence modelling and comparing the flow aerodynamics around both fin geometries

    A novel combination of mathematical modelling approaches for simulating nearly hypersonic, viscous, reacting magnetogasdynamic flows

    No full text
    This work focuses on the mathematical combination of magnetogasdynamics (MGD) and the Dunn and Kang chemical kinetic model with a multi-component Harten–Lax–van Leer Contact (HLLC) local Riemann solver using high-order interpolation schemes. Due to the nature of nearly hypersonic, unsteady, viscous, reacting MGD flows, the gas dissociates which is taken into account with 11 species and 26 chemical reactions along with the temperature dependent transport properties through the Wilke model. In the present work, the electromagnetic effects are considered by solving a Poisson equation simultaneously with the chemical reaction equations. The non-linear convective terms are treated numerically with third-, fifth- and seventh-order Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO) interpolation schemes along with second-, fourth- and sixth-order central finite difference schemes for the viscous terms. The combination of these numerical and physical models are analysed for stability and validated for benchmark problems such as a) Hartmann flow as MGD validation test case and b) the shock-tube problem for testing the chemical reaction model in which case the reaction rate controlling temperature suggested by Park has also been taken into account. Furthermore, a complex physical problem of an external aerodynamic flow over the cube for the Mach number varying from 1.25 to 3 have also been investigated, because a limited number of studies is available for understanding the flow behaviour of sharp cornered blunt bodies such as cubes. The knowledge of shock structures of these objects has become imperative to predict the atmospheric re-entry trajectories of de-orbiting CubeSats, space debris or fragments of launch vehicles. The main physical finding is that the shock structures are observed to be much more resolved compared to previous works, especially in the wake region. The knowledge gap is bridged by detailing the shock structures and showing the dependence of the shock standoff distance on total enthalpy of the flow.Cranfield University: EEB6001
    corecore