38 research outputs found

    Réduction des artéfacts de tuteur coronarien au moyen d’un algorithme de reconstruction avec renforcement des bords : étude prospective transversale en tomodensitométrie 256 coupes

    Get PDF
    Les artéfacts métalliques entraînent un épaississement artéfactuel de la paroi des tuteurs en tomodensitométrie (TDM) avec réduction apparente de leur lumière. Cette étude transversale prospective, devis mesures répétées et observateurs avec méthode en aveugle, chez 24 patients consécutifs/71 tuteurs coronariens a pour objectif de comparer l’épaisseur de paroi des tuteurs en TDM après reconstruction par un algorithme avec renforcement des bords et un algorithme standard. Une angiographie coronarienne par TDM 256 coupes a été réalisée, avec reconstruction par algorithmes avec renforcement des bords et standard. L’épaisseur de paroi des tuteurs était mesurée par méthodes orthogonale (diamètres) et circonférentielle (circonférences). La qualité d’image des tuteurs était évaluée par échelle ordinale, et les données analysées par modèles linéaire mixte et régression logistique des cotes proportionnelles. L’épaisseur de paroi des tuteurs était inférieure avec l’algorithme avec renforcement des bords comparé à l’algorithme standard, avec les méthodes orthogonale (0,97±0,02 vs 1,09±0,03 mm, respectivement; p<0,001) et circonférentielle (1,13±0,02 vs 1,21±0,02 mm, respectivement; p<0,001). Le premier causait moins de surestimation par rapport à l’épaisseur nominale comparé au second, avec méthodes orthogonale (0,89±0,19 vs 1,00±0,26 mm, respectivement; p<0,001) et circonférentielle (1,06±0,26 vs 1,13±0,31 mm, respectivement; p=0,005) et diminuait de 6 % la surestimation. Les scores de qualité étaient meilleurs avec l’algorithme avec renforcement des bords (OR 3,71; IC 95% 2,33–5,92; p<0,001). En conclusion, la reconstruction des images avec l’algorithme avec renforcement des bords génère des parois de tuteurs plus minces, moins de surestimation, et de meilleurs scores de qualité d’image que l’algorithme standard.Metallic artifacts can result in an artificial thickening of the coronary stent wall which can significantly impair computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with coronary stents. The purpose of this study is to assess the in vivo visualization of coronary stent wall and lumen with an edge-enhancing CT reconstruction kernel, as compared to a standard kernel. This is a prospective cross-sectional study of 24 consecutive patients with 71 coronary stents, using a repeated measure design and blinded observers, approved by the Local Institutional Review Board. 256-slice CT angiography was used, as well as standard and edge-enhancing reconstruction kernels. Stent wall thickness was measured with orthogonal and circumference methods, averaging wall thickness from stent diameter and circumference measurements, respectively. Stent image quality was assessed on an ordinal scale. Statistical analysis used linear and proportional odds models. Stent wall thickness was inferior using the edge-enhancing kernel compared to the standard kernel, either with the orthogonal (0.97±0.02 versus 1.09±0.03 mm, respectively; p<0.001) or circumference method (1.13±0.02 versus 1.21±0.02 mm, respectively; p<0.001). The edge-enhancing kernel generated less overestimation from nominal thickness compared to the standard kernel, both with orthogonal (0.89±0.19 versus 1.00±0.26 mm, respectively; p<0.001) and circumference (1.06±0.26 versus 1.13±0.31 mm, respectively; p=0.005) methods. The average decrease in stent wall thickness overestimation with an edge-enhancing kernel was 6%. Image quality scores were higher with the edge-enhancing kernel (odds ratio 3.71, 95% CI 2.33–5.92; p<0.001). In conclusion, the edge-enhancing CT reconstruction kernel generated thinner stent walls, less overestimation from nominal thickness, and better image quality scores than the standard kernel

    Coronary stent artifact reduction with an edge-enhancing reconstruction kernel : a prospective cross-sectional study with 256-slice CT

    Get PDF
    Purpose Metallic artifacts can result in an artificial thickening of the coronary stent wall which can significantly impair computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with coronary stents. The objective of this study is to assess in vivo visualization of coronary stent wall and lumen with an edge-enhancing CT reconstruction kernel, as compared to a standard kernel. Methods This is a prospective cross-sectional study involving the assessment of 71 coronary stents (24 patients), with blinded observers. After 256-slice CT angiography, image reconstruction was done with medium-smooth and edge-enhancing kernels. Stent wall thickness was measured with both orthogonal and circumference methods, averaging thickness from diameter and circumference measurements, respectively. Image quality was assessed quantitatively using objective parameters (noise, signal to noise (SNR) and contrast to noise (CNR) ratios), as well as visually using a 5-point Likert scale. Results Stent wall thickness was decreased with the edge-enhancing kernel in comparison to the standard kernel, either with the orthogonal (0.97 ± 0.02 versus 1.09 ± 0.03 mm, respectively; p<0.001) or the circumference method (1.13 ± 0.02 versus 1.21 ± 0.02 mm, respectively; p = 0.001). The edge-enhancing kernel generated less overestimation from nominal thickness compared to the standard kernel, both with the orthogonal (0.89 ± 0.19 versus 1.00 ± 0.26 mm, respectively; p<0.001) and the circumference (1.06 ± 0.26 versus 1.13 ± 0.31 mm, respectively; p = 0.005) methods. The edge-enhancing kernel was associated with lower SNR and CNR, as well as higher background noise (all p < 0.001), in comparison to the medium-smooth kernel. Stent visual scores were higher with the edge-enhancing kernel (p<0.001). Conclusion In vivo 256-slice CT assessment of coronary stents shows that the edge-enhancing CT reconstruction kernel generates thinner stent walls, less overestimation from nominal thickness, and better image quality scores than the standard kernel

    Deep learning of chest X‑rays can predict mechanical ventilation outcome in ICU‑admitted COVID‑19 patients

    Get PDF
    The COVID-19 pandemic repeatedly overwhelms healthcare systems capacity and forced the development and implementation of triage guidelines in ICU for scarce resources (e.g. mechanical ventilation). These guidelines were often based on known risk factors for COVID-19. It is proposed that image data, specifically bedside computed X-ray (CXR), provide additional predictive information on mortality following mechanical ventilation that can be incorporated in the guidelines. Deep transfer learning was used to extract convolutional features from a systematically collected, multi-institutional dataset of COVID-19 ICU patients. A model predicting outcome of mechanical ventilation (remission or mortality) was trained on the extracted features and compared to a model based on known, aggregated risk factors. The model reached a 0.702 area under the curve (95% CI 0.707-0.694) at predicting mechanical ventilation outcome from pre-intubation CXRs, higher than the risk factor model. Combining imaging data and risk factors increased model performance to 0.743 AUC (95% CI 0.746-0.732). Additionally, a post-hoc analysis showed an increase performance on high-quality than low-quality CXRs, suggesting that using only high-quality images would result in an even stronger model

    CXCL13 as a Biomarker of Immune Activation During Early and Chronic HIV Infection

    Get PDF
    Background: CXCL13 is preferentially secreted by Follicular Helper T cells (TFH) to attract B cells to germinal centers. Plasma levels of CXCL13 have been reported to be elevated during chronic HIV-infection, however there is limited data on such elevation during early phases of infection and on the effect of ART. Moreover, the contribution of CXCL13 to disease progression and systemic immune activation have been partially defined. Herein, we assessed the relationship between plasma levels of CXCL13 and systemic immune activation.Methods: Study samples were collected in 114 people living with HIV (PLWH) who were in early (EHI) or chronic (CHI) HIV infection and 35 elite controllers (EC) compared to 17 uninfected controls (UC). A subgroup of 11 EHI who initiated ART and 14 who did not were followed prospectively. Plasma levels of CXCL13 were correlated with CD4 T cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, plasma viral load (VL), markers of microbial translocation [LPS, sCD14, and (1→3)-β-D-Glucan], markers of B cell activation (total IgG, IgM, IgA, and IgG1-4), and inflammatory/activation markers like IL-6, IL-8, IL-1β, TNF-α, IDO-1 activity, and frequency of CD38+HLA-DR+ T cells on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.Results: Plasma levels of CXCL13 were elevated in EHI (127.9 ± 64.9 pg/mL) and CHI (229.4 ± 28.5 pg/mL) compared to EC (71.3 ± 20.11 pg/mL), and UC (33.4 ± 14.9 pg/mL). Longitudinal analysis demonstrated that CXCL13 remains significantly elevated after 14 months without ART (p &lt; 0.001) and was reduced without normalization after 24 months on ART (p = 0.002). Correlations were observed with VL, CD4 T cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, LPS, sCD14, (1→3)-β-D-Glucan, total IgG, TNF-α, Kynurenine/Tryptophan ratio, and frequency of CD38+HLA-DR+ CD4 and CD8 T cells. In addition, CMV+ PLWH presented with higher levels of plasma CXCL13 than CMV- PLWH (p = 0.005).Conclusion: Plasma CXCL13 levels increased with HIV disease progression. Early initiation of ART reduces plasma CXCL13 and B cell activation without normalization. CXCL13 represents a novel marker of systemic immune activation during early and chronic HIV infection and may be used to predict the development of non-AIDS events
    corecore