Rasch Analysis of the International Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0

Objective: To examine the internal construct validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0 (QoL-BDS V2.0) and compare this with the internal construct validity of the original version of the QoL-BDS. Design: International cross-sectional psychometric study. Setting: Spinal rehabilitation units, clinics, and community. Participants: The study involved 5 sites and 4 countries, 2 of whose primary language is not English. Each site included a consecutive sample of inpatients with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and a convenience sample of individuals with SCI/D living in the community (N=565). Main outcome measures: The QoL-BDS V2.0 consists of the 3 original items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health, psychological health of the QoL-BDS, and an additional item on satisfaction with social life. All 4 items are answered on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Rasch analysis was performed on versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the QoL-BDS to examine the ordering of the items' response options, item scaling, reliability, item fit, local item independence, differential item functioning, and unidimensionality. Results: The sample included 565 participants with 57% outpatients and 43% inpatients. Mean age was 51.4 years; 71% were male; 65% had a traumatic injury, 40% had tetraplegia, and 67% were wheelchair users. Item thresholds were collapsed for ordering, and subsequent analyses showed good internal construct validity for the QoL-BDS V2.0 with a person separation reliability of 0.76 and Cronbach α of 0.81. Infit and outfit statistics ranged 0.62-0.91. No local dependencies and multidimensionality were found. Differential item functioning was observed only for country and inpatients vs outpatients but not for other participants' characteristics. Differences in internal construct validity between the 3-item and 4-item versions were minimal. Conclusions: The results of this Rasch analysis support the internal construct validity of the QoL-BDS V2.0

Про один підхід до ідентифікації особи за контуром профілю носа

У статті розглядається підхід для ідентифікації особи за контуром профілю носа. Для знаходження простору ознак пропонується використовувати апроксимацію за допомогою B-сплайнів. Алгоритмічна реалізація підходу використовує моделювання структури бази даних у вигляді n- вимірного куба.В статье рассматривается подход для идентификации личности по контуру носа. Для нахождения пространства признаков предлагается использовать аппроксимацию с помощью B-сплайнов. Алгоритмическая реализация подхода использует моделирование структуры базы данных в виде n-мерного куба.An approach of human identification by the nose contour profile is researched in the paper. B-splines approximation is suggested for determining the feature space. Algorithmic implementation of the approach uses database structure in the form of n-dimensional cube

Rasch Analysis of the International Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0

Objective: To examine the internal construct validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set Version 2.0 (QoL-BDS V2.0) and compare this with the internal construct validity of the original version of the QoL-BDS. Design: International cross-sectional psychometric study. Setting: Spinal rehabilitation units, clinics, and community. Participants: The study involved 5 sites and 4 countries, 2 of whose primary language is not English. Each site included a consecutive sample of inpatients with spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and a convenience sample of individuals with SCI/D living in the community (N=565). Main Outcome Measures: The QoL-BDS V2.0 consists of the 3 original items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health, psychological health of the QoL-BDS, and an additional item on satisfaction with social life. All 4 items are answered on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Rasch analysis was performed on versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the QoL-BDS to examine the ordering of the items’ response options, item scaling, reliability, item fit, local item independence, differential item functioning, and unidimensionality. Results: The sample included 565 participants with 57% outpatients and 43% inpatients. Mean age was 51.4 years; 71% were male; 65% had a traumatic injury, 40% had tetraplegia, and 67% were wheelchair users. Item thresholds were collapsed for ordering, and subsequent analyses showed good internal construct validity for the QoL-BDS V2.0 with a person separation reliability of 0.76 and Cronbach α of 0.81. Infit and outfit statistics ranged 0.62-0.91. No local dependencies and multidimensionality were found. Differential item functioning was observed only for country and inpatients vs outpatients but not for other participants’ characteristics. Differences in internal construct validity between the 3-item and 4-item versions were minimal. Conclusions: The results of this Rasch analysis support the internal construct validity of the QoL-BDS V2.0

Development of the International Spinal Cord Injury Activities and Participation Basic Data Set

Study design: Consensus decision-making process. Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop an International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Activities and Participation (A&P) Basic Data Set. Setting: International working group. Methods: A committee of experts was established to select and define A&P data elements to be included in this data set. A draft data set was developed and posted on the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) and American Spinal Injury Association websites and was also disseminated among appropriate organizations for review. Suggested revisions were considered, and a final version of the A&P Data Set was completed. Results: Consensus was reached to define A&P and to incorporate both performance and satisfaction ratings. Items that were considered core to each A&P domain were selected from two existing questionnaires. Four items measuring activities were selected from the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III to provide basic data on task execution in activities of daily living. Eight items were selected from the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique to provide basic data on the frequency of participation. An additional rating of satisfaction on a three-point scale for each item completes the total of 24 A&P variables. Conclusion: Collection of the International SCI A&P Basic Data Set variables in all future research on SCI outcomes is advised to facilitate comparison of results across published studies from around the world. Additional standardised instruments to assess activities of daily living or participation can be administered, depending on the purpose of a particular study

Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set

Study design: Cross-sectional validation study. Objectives: To examine the construct and concurrent validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Quality of Life (QoL) Basic Data Set. Setting: Dutch community. Participants: People 28-65 years of age, who obtained their SCI between 18 and 35 years of age, were at least 10 years post SCI and were wheelchair users in daily life. Measure(s): The International SCI QoL Basic Data Set consists of three single items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health and psychological health (0=complete dissatisfaction; 10=complete satisfaction). Reference measures were the Mental Health Inventory-5 and three items of the World Health Organization Quality of Life measure. Results: Data of 261 participants were available. Mean time after SCI was 24.1 years (s.d. 9.1); 90.4% had a traumatic SCI, 81.5% a motor complete SCI and 40% had tetraplegia. Mean age was 47.9 years (s.d. 8.8) and 73.2% were male. Mean scores were 6.9 (s.d. 1.9) for general QoL, 5.8 (s.d. 2.2) for physical health and 7.1 (s.d. 1.9) for psychological health. No floor or ceiling effects were found. Strong inter-correlations (0.48-0.71) were found between the items, and Cronbach's alpha of the scale was good (0.81). Correlations with the reference measures showed the strongest correlations between the WHOQOL general satisfaction item and general QoL (0.64), the WHOQOL health and daily activities items and physical health (0.69 and 0.60) and the Mental Health Inventory-5 and psychological health (0.70). Conclusions: This first validity study of the International SCI QoL Basic Data Set shows that it appears valid for persons with SCI