9 research outputs found

    FDA Decisions on Petitions Filed between 2001 and 2013.

    No full text
    <p>Approved petitions include partially approved petitions with a substantive outcome. Denied petitions include petitions that are in essence denied. Source: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/" target="_blank">www.regulations.gov</a>.</p

    FDA Citizen Petitions over the Years.

    No full text
    <p>Successful petitions attributed to the year of filing, not to the year of decision. Source: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/" target="_blank">www.regulations.gov</a>.</p

    Common subcategories for petition denials on scientific and legal grounds.

    No full text
    <p>Common subcategories for petition denials on scientific and legal grounds.</p

    Reasons for Petition Denials.

    No full text
    <p>Denied petitions include petitions that are denied in part. Source: <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/" target="_blank">www.regulations.gov</a>.</p

    Summary of Successful Petitions to the FDA (2001–2013).

    No full text
    <p>Summary of Successful Petitions to the FDA (2001–2013).</p

    Age distribution and ADAMTS13 inhibitor levels in acquired idiopathic (ai−) TTP with severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity.

    No full text
    <p>Upper panel shows the age distribution of 186 patients with severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity under 5%. We found wide range of the age at TTP bouts from 8 months old to 87 years old. The highest incident peak was found around 60 years old. Lower panel shows the distribution of ADAMTS13 inhibitors in 186 ai-TTP patients with severe deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity. We found ADAMTS13 inhibitors (≥0.5 BU/ml) in 182 patients (97.8%). High titer inhibitors ≥2.0 BU/ml was seen in 101 patients (54.3%).</p

    Clinical features in ai-TTP patients with severe deficiency of ADAMTS13:AC.

    No full text
    <p>NS: not significant difference (≥0.05).</p><p>Overall p values were caluculated using the Kruskal-Wallis H tests or chi-square tests with Yates' correction for 2×4 tables.</p><p>Significant differnces between 4 groups (overall p<0.05) were further analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test or chi-squre test.</p>a<p>p<0.01 between Group 1 and Groups 2, 3, 4.</p>b<p>p<0.01 between Group 1 and Groups 3, 4, and between Group 2 and Groups 3, 4.</p>c<p>p<0.01 between Group 1 and Groups 3, 4.</p>d<p>p<0.05 between Group 2 and Group 4.</p
    corecore