52 research outputs found

    Management of the Hepatic Lymph Nodes during Resection of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

    Get PDF
    Background. Hepatic lymph node involvement is generally considered a contraindication for liver resection performed for colorectal liver metastases. However, some advocate hepatic lymphadenectomy in the presence of macroscopic involvement and others routine lymphadenectomy. The aim of this review is to assess the role of lymphadenectomy in resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Methods. Medline, Embase and Central databases were searched using a formal search strategy. Trials with survival data with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were considered for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman. Results. A total of 4230 references were identified. Ten reports of nine studies including 926 patients qualified for the review. The prevalence of nodal metastases after routine lymphadenectomy was 16.3%. The overall 3-year and 5-year survival rates in node-positive patients were 9/151 (11.3%) and 2/137 (1.5%), respectively, compared to 3-year and 5-year survival rates of 424/787 (53.9%) and 246/767 (32.1%) in node-negative patients. The odds ratios for 3-year and 5-year survivals in node positive disease compared to node-negative disease were 0.12 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.24) and 0.08 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.22). There was no randomized controlled trial which assessed the survival benefit of routine or “selective” lymphadenectomy. Conclusion. Currently, there is no evidence of survival benefit for routine or selective lymphadenectomy. Survival rates are low in patients with positive lymph nodes draining the liver irrespective of whether they are detected by routine lymphadenectomy or by macroscopic involvement. Further trials in this patient group are required

    Microparticle alpha-2-macroglobulin enhances pro-resolving responses and promotes survival in sepsis

    Get PDF
    These studies were supported by The Wellcome Trust (program 086867/Z/08) and the William Harvey Research Foundation to MP, the United Kingdom Intensive Care Society to CJH and the National Institutes of Health GM Grant P01GM095967 (awarded to Charles N. Serhan). LVN is supported by an Arthritis Research UK Career Development Fellowship (19909). EPSRC Seed Funding Cross disciplinary Grant (QMUL) awarded to GBS and MP. This work forms part of the research themes contributing to the translational research portfolio of Barts and The London NIHR Cardiovascular BRU

    Management of patients at the hepatopancreatobiliary unit of a London teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Get PDF
    To mitigate COVID-19-related shortage of treatment capacity, the hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) unit of the Royal Free Hospital London (RFHL) transferred its practice to independent hospitals in Central London through the North Central London Cancer Alliance. The aim of this study was to critically assess this strategy and evaluate perioperative outcomes. Prospectively collected data were reviewed on all patients who were treated under the RFHL HPB unit in six hospitals between November 2020 and October 2021. A total of 1541 patients were included, as follows: 1246 (81%) at the RFHL, 41 (3%) at the Chase Farm Hospital, 23 (2%) at the Whittington Hospital, 207 (13%) at the Princess Grace Hospital, 12 (1%) at the Wellington Hospital and 12 (1%) at the Lister Hospital, Chelsea. Across all institutions, overall complication rate were 40%, major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3a) rate were 11% and mortality rates were 1.4%, respectively. In COVID-19-positive patients (n = 28), compared with negative patients, complication rate and mortality rates were increased tenfold. Outsourcing HPB patients, including their specialist care, to surrounding institutions was safe and ensured ongoing treatment with comparable outcomes among the institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the lack of direct comparison with a non-pandemic cohort, these results can strictly only be applied within a pandemic setting

    Portal vein pseudoaneurysm secondary to pancreatic lymphoma and biliary stent insertion: a rare cause of haemobilia

    No full text
    Abstract Background Haemobilia, defined as bleeding from the biliary tree, is a rare entity. The most common cause of haemobilia is iatrogenic trauma, which accounts for 70% of cases. Pseudoaneurysms of the portal vein are an extremely rare cause of haemobilia with only four reported cases to date. Conservative treatment, open surgical repair and percutaneous trans hepatic stent-grafting have all been employed in these cases. This displays the lack of consensus regarding the treatment of this condition. We report the first case of a portal vein pseudoaneurysm following endoscopic common bile duct stent placement performed to relieve obstruction of the common bile duct for lymphomatous infiltration of the pancreatic head. The pseudoaneurysm was successfully treated by placement of a percutaneous trans hepatic covered stent-graft. Case presentation A 42-year-old man with a history of lymphomatous infiltration of the pancreatic head and recent endoscopic common bile duct stent placement presented with sudden onset large volume haematemesis. On the portal venous phase of a triple phase CT, this was found to be secondary to a portal vein pseudoaneurysm bulging into the upper portion of the indwelling biliary stent. The pseudoaneurysm was successfully treated by percutaneous trans hepatic placement of a covered vascular stent-graft. Conclusions We report a rare case of portal vein pseudo aneurysm successfully treated by percutaneous trans hepatic portal venous covered vascular stent-graft insertion

    Remote ischaemic preconditioning in orthotopic liver transplantation (RIPCOLT trial): a pilot randomized controlled feasibility study

    Get PDF
    BackgroundIschaemia Reperfusion (IR) injury is a major cause of morbidity, mortality and graft loss following Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT). Utilising marginal grafts, which are more susceptible to IR injury, makes this a key research goal. Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to ameliorate hepatic IR injury in experimental models. Whether RIPC can reduce IR injury in human liver transplant recipients is unknown.MethodsForty patients undergoing liver transplantation were randomized to RIPC or a sham. RIPC was induced through three 5 min cycles of alternate ischaemia and reperfusion of the left leg prior to surgery. Data on clinical outcomes was collected prospectively. Per-operative cytokine levels were measured.ResultsFourty five of 51 patients approached (88%) were willing to enroll in the study. Five patients were excluded and 40 randomized, of which 20 underwent RIPC which was successfully completed in all patients. There were no complications following RIPC. Median day 3 AST levels were slightly higher in the RIPC group (221 IU vs 149 IU, p = 1.00).ConclusionsRIPC is acceptable and safe in liver transplant recipients. This study has not demonstrated evidence of a reduction in short-term measures of IR injury. Longer follow up will be required and consideration of an altered protocol
    corecore