25 research outputs found

    Synergistic Interfacial Optimization for High-Sulfur-Content All-Solid-State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

    No full text
    Improving the sulfur content in the cathode is essential for achieving high-energy-density all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries (ASSLSBs). However, the complex multiinterfaces, akin to the short wooden planks that consist of the cask, severely limit the performance of ASSLSBs with high sulfur content. Since singular approaches fail to optimize these interfaces simultaneously, we propose a synergistic approach using a dual-doped sulfide solid electrolyte (Y2S3 and LiI) and an SbSn alloy sulfur host in this work. The incorporation of Y2S3 in the solid electrolyte serves to improve the electrolyte–electrolyte interfaces and enhance the ionic conductivity, while the inclusion of LiI helps stabilize the electrolyte–anode interface and suppress dendrite formation. Meanwhile, the SbSn alloy sulfur host facilitates the transfer of Li+ at the electrolyte–cathode interfaces. Consequently, the solid–solid interfaces are significantly improved, leading to impressive specific capacities in ASSLSBs with high sulfur content (>44% in the cathode composite) at room temperature (1163.5 mAh g–1) and at 60 °C (1408.7 mAh g–1) during the 50th cycle at 0.05C. This work presents a promising strategy for achieving practical high-performance ASSLSBs

    Image_1_Construction of a mycelium sphere using a Fusarium strain isolate and Chlorella sp. for polyacrylamide biodegradation and inorganic carbon fixation.pdf

    No full text
    In the context of global demand for carbon reduction, the formation of inorganic carbon (IC) in the wastewater from oil flooding becomes a potential threat. In this study, Chlorella sp. and Fusarium sp. were used to assemble a fungal-algal pellet to degrade polyacrylamide (PAM) and fix IC in synthetic oil-flooding wastewater. The results showed that the combination of Chlorella sp. and Fusarium sp. was more effective at degrading PAM and removing carbon than a monoculture. With PAM as the sole nitrogen source, the degradation of PAM by the consortium was enhanced up to 35.17 ± 0.86% and 21.63 ± 2.23% compared with the monocultures of fungi or microalgae, respectively. The degradation of the consortium was significantly enhanced by the addition of an external nitrogen source by up to 27.17 ± 2.27% and 22.86 ± 2.4% compared with the monoculture of fungi or microalgae, respectively. This may depend on the effect of synergy between the two species. For the removal of IC from the water, the removal efficiency of the consortium was higher than that of the microalgae by 38.5 ± 0.08%, which may be attributed to the ability of the fungi to aid in the adsorption of nutrients and its assimilation by the microalgae. Therefore, the Fusarium-Chlorella consortium can effectively degrade PAM, while simultaneously fixing carbon, which provides a feasible scheme for the treatment and carbon neutralization of the wastewater that contains PAM.</p

    Five-fold cross-validation on <i>S.cerevisiae</i> dataset.

    No full text
    <p>Five-fold cross-validation on <i>S.cerevisiae</i> dataset.</p

    The prediction on the Wnt-related pathway network.

    No full text
    <p>The prediction on the Wnt-related pathway network.</p

    Comparison of SN by different classifiers.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of SN by different classifiers.</p

    The performance of different methods on <i>S.cerevisiae</i> dataset.

    No full text
    <p>The performance of different methods on <i>S.cerevisiae</i> dataset.</p

    Contribution of QLC, QNC and QLC+QNC on <i>H.pylori</i> dataset.

    No full text
    <p>Contribution of QLC, QNC and QLC+QNC on <i>H.pylori</i> dataset.</p

    Six physicochemical properties for 20 amino acid types.

    No full text
    <p>Six physicochemical properties for 20 amino acid types.</p

    Contribution of QLC, QNC and QLC+QNC on <i>Huamn</i> dataset.

    No full text
    <p>Contribution of QLC, QNC and QLC+QNC on <i>Huamn</i> dataset.</p

    Comparison of F-Score by different classifiers.

    No full text
    <p>Comparison of F-Score by different classifiers.</p
    corecore