Client Service Receipt Inventory as a standardised tool for measurement of socio-economic costs in the rare genetic disease population (CSRI-Ra)

The measurement of costs is fundamental in healthcare decision-making, but it is often challenging. In particular, standardised methods have not been developed in the rare genetic disease population. A reliable and valid tool is critical for research to be locally meaningful yet internationally comparable. Herein, we sought to develop, contextualise, translate, and validate the Client Service Receipt Inventory for the RAre disease population (CSRI-Ra) to be used in cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations for healthcare planning. Through expert panel discussions and focus group meetings involving 17 rare disease patients, carers, and healthcare and social care professionals from Hong Kong, we have developed the CSRI-Ra. Rounds of forward and backward translations were performed by bilingual researchers, and face validity and semantic equivalence were achieved through interviews and telephone communications with focus group participants and an additional of 13 healthcare professional and university students. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess criterion validity between CSRI-Ra and electronic patient record in a sample of 94 rare disease patients and carers, with overall ICC being 0.69 (95% CI 0.56–0.78), indicating moderate to good agreement. Following rounds of revision in the development, contextualisation, translation, and validation stages, the CSRI-Ra is ready for use in empirical research. The CSRI-Ra provides a sufficiently standardised yet adaptable method for collecting socio-economic data related to rare genetic diseases. This is important for near-term and long-term monitoring of the resource consequences of rare diseases, and it provides a tool for use in economic evaluations in the future, thereby helping to inform planning for efficient and effective healthcare. Adaptation of the CSRI-Ra to other populations would facilitate international research

Socio-economic costs of rare diseases and the risk of financial hardship: a cross-sectional study

Background: To achieve universal healthcare coverage (UHC), the rare disease (RD) population must also receive quality healthcare without financial hardship. This study evaluates the impact of RDs in Hong Kong (HK) by estimating cost from a societal perspective and investigating related risk of financial hardship. Methods: A total of 284 RD patients and caregivers covering 106 RDs were recruited through HK's largest RD patient group, Rare Disease Hong Kong, in 2020. Resource use data were collected using the Client Service Receipt Inventory for Rare disease population (CSRI-Ra). Costs were estimated using a prevalence-based, bottom-up approach. Risk of financial hardship was estimated using catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishing health expenditure (IHE) indicators. Multivariate regression was performed to identify potential determinants. Findings: Annual total RD costs in HK were estimated at HK$484,256/patient (United States (US)$62,084). Direct non-healthcare cost (HK$193,555/US$24,814) was the highest cost type, followed by direct healthcare (HK$187,166/US$23,995), and indirect (HK$103,535/US$13,273) costs. CHE at the 10% threshold was estimated at 36.3% and IHE at the $3.1 poverty line was 8.8%, both significantly higher than global estimates. Pediatric patients reported higher costs than adult patients (p < 0.001). Longer years since genetic diagnosis was the only factor significantly associated with both total costs (p = 0.026) and CHE (p = 0.003). Interpretation: This study serves as the first in the Asia Pacific region to simultaneously assess the societal costs and financial hardship related to RDs and highlights the importance of an early genetic diagnosis. These results contribute to existing evidence on the globally ubiquitous high costs of RDs, warranting collaboration between different stakeholders to include RD population in UHC planning. Funding: Health and Medical Research Fund, and the Society for the Relief of Disabled Children