Multidetector CT enteroclysis: comparison of the reading performance for axial and coronal views

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of axial and coronal views in multidetector CT enteroclysis (MDCTE). We retrospectively evaluated 48 patients with pathological correlation investigated by MDCTE for small bowel disorders. After nasojejunal administration of 2l of 5% methylcellulose axial arterial and venous acquisition of MDCTE was followed by coronal reconstructions using equal slice thicknesses of 2.5mm with 2mm increments. Spatial resolution of both planes was evaluated by phantom. Three radiologists independently read axial and coronal images concerning 12 pathological features. The interobserver agreement and time of reading was calculated. Sensitivity and specificity resulted from comparison with histopathology (n=39) or follow-up (n=9). Phantom study revealed higher spatial resolution for axial than coronal views, whatever reconstruction interval was used. However, spatial frequency always remained high. Most pathological signs, such as bowel wall thickening (BWT), bowel wall enhancement (BWE) and intraperitoneal fluid (IPF), showed better interobserver agreement on axial than coronal views (BWT: 0.61 vs. 0.44; BWE: 0.56 vs. 0.5; IPF:0.53 vs. 0.43). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed significantly higher sensitivity for axial than coronal views (P=0.0453); the time of reading was significantly shorter for the latter (P=0.0146). The diagnostic value of axial slices is superior to coronal reconstructions despite the reduced data volume and display of the physiological course of bowel loops on the coronal plan

Detection of liver metastases under 2cm: comparison of different acquisition protocols in four row multidetector-CT (MDCT)

This study compared different acquisition protocols performance to detect small liver metastases (<2cm). Thirty consecutive patients with histologically proven hepatic metastases were explored by MDCT at the liver equilibrium phase by four successive acquisitions. We compared the following protocols (1-4): 5/30/1.5 (section thickness/table speed/pitch); 5/15/0.75; 5/11.25/0.75; and 2.5/15/1.5 with the same X-ray dose. The gold standard was based on patient radiological follow-up. Evolutive lesions were considered as true positive (TP). The described lesions, not found on the follow-up exams despite tumoral progression, were considered as false positive (FP). Stable lesions could not be considered as metastasis and were eliminated. One hundred and seventy-six lesions were detected: 61 TP and 91 FP. Twenty-four lesions were eliminated. The mean kappa values for protocols 1, 2, 3 and 4 were, respectively, 0.43, 0.68, 0.73 and 0.51 (0.61-0.80: substantial agreement) and the mean areas under the ROC curve were, respectively, 0.76, 0.87, 0.86 and 0.80. The results of protocols 2 and 3 were significantly superior to those of protocols 1 and 4. MDCT protocols using thin sections or an increased table speed are less efficient in detecting small metastase