Major urological cancer surgery for patients is safe and surgical training should be encouraged during the COVID-19 pandemic : A multi-centre analysis of 30-day outcomes

Funding Information: Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: Wei Shen Tan is funded by the Urology Foundation . Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s) Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.COVID-19 has resulted in the deferral of major surgery for genitourinary (GU) cancers with the exception of cancers with a high risk of progression. We report outcomes for major GU cancer operations, namely radical prostatectomy (RP), radical cystectomy (RC), radical nephrectomy (RN), partial nephrectomy (PN), and nephroureterectomy performed at 13 major GU cancer centres across the UK between March 1 and May 5, 2020. A total of 598 such operations were performed. Four patients (0.7%) developed COVID-19 postoperatively. There was no COVID-19–related mortality at 30 d. A minimally invasive approach was used in 499 cases (83.4%). A total of 228 cases (38.1%) were described as training procedures. Training case status was not associated with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.194) or hospital length of stay (LOS; p > 0.05 for all operation types). The risk of contracting COVID-19 was not associated with longer hospital LOS (p = 0.146), training case status (p = 0.588), higher ASA score (p = 0.295), or type of hospital site (p = 0.303). Our results suggest that major surgery for urological cancers remains safe and training should be encouraged during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic provided appropriate countermeasures are taken. These real-life data are important for policy-makers and clinicians when counselling patients during the current pandemic. Patient summary: We collected outcome data for major operations for prostate, bladder, and kidney cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic. These surgeries remain safe and training should be encouraged during the ongoing pandemic provided appropriate countermeasures are taken. Our real-life results are important for policy-makers and clinicians when counselling patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.Peer reviewe

HaEmaturia After Transurethral resection of bladder Tumour (HEATT): A multicentre, regional collaborative analysis of factors associated with emergency re-admission with haematuria following TURBT

Objective: To calculate the re-admission rate with haematuria within 30 days of elective transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), and identify factors associated with this. Materials and Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective audit, identifying all adult patients over the age of 16 who underwent elective TURBT between 1 September and 30 November 2019. Data were collected from medical records and operation notes on patient demographics, intra-operative factors and post-operative management. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients emergently re-admitted with haematuria. Secondary outcome measures were the re-operation rate for haematuria, and the rate of new acute thrombotic event (TE). Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate p values within subgroups for re-admission rates. Results: 443 patients from 12 hospitals were included. Median age was 75 years (17–99). 15 patients (3.4%) were re-admitted with haematuria. Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher rate of re-admission for pre-existing antithrombotic agents (ATAs) (2.0% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.046), increased for non-Aspirin ATAs (10.5%, p = 0.0015). 52% of non-Aspirin ATAs were restarted within 48 hours of surgery; post-operative plan for restarting was not documented in 22.1%. One patient (0.23%) developed acute TE (pulmonary embolus). Conclusion: Pre-existing use of non-Aspirin ATAs is associated with increased risk of post-TURBT haematuria, with variable practice in post-operative recommencement. Level of evidence: Level