Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension

Background & Aims: Liver resection (LR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) defined as a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) >−10 mmHg is not encouraged. Here, we reap praised the outcomes of patients with cirrhosis and CSPH who underwent LR for HCC in highly specialised liver centres. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre study from 1999 to 2019. Predictors for postoperative liver decompensation and textbook outcomes were identified. Results: In total, 79 patients with a median age of 65 years were included. The Child-Pugh grade was A in 99% of patients, and the median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 8. The median HVPG was 12 mmHg. Major hepatectomies and laparoscopies were performed in 28% and 34% of patients, respectively. Ninety-day mortality and severe morbidity rates were 6% and 27%, respectively. Postoperative and persistent liver decompensation occurred in 35% and 10% of patients at 3 months. Predictors of liver decompensation included increased preoperative HVPG (p = 0.004), increased serum total bilirubin (p = 0.02), and open approach (p = 0.03). Of the patients, 34% achieved a textbook outcome, of which the laparoscopic approach was the sole predictor (p = 0.004). The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 55% and 43%, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with cirrhosis, HCC and HVPG >−10 mmHg can undergo LR with acceptable mortality, morbidity, and liver decompensation rates. The laparoscopic approach was the sole predictor of a textbook outcome

Laparoscopic vs. Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Cirrhotic Liver: A Case-Control Study

Laparoscopic liver resection is considered a safe and feasible alternative to open surgery for malignant liver lesions. However, laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to compare morbidity, mortality, and long-term patient survival between laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) and open liver resections (OLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis. A total of 45 patients treated with LLR were matched by cause of cirrhosis, Child-Pugh score, type of surgical resection (subsegmentectomy, segmentectomy, and bisegmentectomy), tumor number, tumor size, and alpha-fetoprotein value with 45 patients treated with OLR. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were compared between groups. Compared with OLR, the LLR group displayed a significantly shorter operative time (140 vs. 180 min; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (7 vs. 12 days; p < 0.0001), and lower morbidity rate (20 vs. 45 % of patients; p = 0.01). A higher rate of R0 resection was observed in the LLR group than in the OLR group (95 vs. 85 %; p = 0.03). Postoperative ascites was more frequently observed in the OLR group (18 vs. 2 %; p = 0.01). Mortality, patient, and disease-free survival rates were similar between groups. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 88, 59, and 12 %, respectively, in the LLR group and 63, 44, and 22 % in the OLR group (p = 0.27). Significantly shorter operative times, better resection margins, lower postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay were observed in the LLR group compared with the OLR group. LLR and OLR have similar overall and disease-free survival rates in cirrhotic HCC patients

Local Ablation Does Not Worsen Perioperative Outcomes After Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE. Local ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before liver transplant has important advantages, such as preventing disease progression, tumor downstaging, and offering a test of time. However, it might render liver transplant more technically demanding Thus far, its potential effect on liver transplant outcomes is still unknown, and, therefore, the current study was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients who underwent liver transplant for HCC at a single tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2016 were included and retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent liver resection and local ablation before liver transplant were excluded. Patients treated with local ablation before liver transplant were compared with those not treated with local ablation, both before and after propensity score matching In addition, the local ablation group was compared with patients who underwent primary resection before liver transplant. Posttreatment mortality and morbidity were determined, and overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated. RESULTS. In total, 182 patients were included. Twenty-six patients underwent resection but not local ablation before liver transplant. Of the remaining 156 patients, 66 (42%) underwent local ablation before liver transplant and 90 (58%) did not. Perioperative mortality and morbidity were similar in both groups before and after propensity score matching (8% and 74% in the local ablation group vs 10% and 83% in the non-local ablation group, p = 0.60 and 0.17, respectively). In addition, no significant differences in long-term outcomes were observed between the groups before and after propensity score matching Also, no differences were observed in outcomes in the local ablation group versus the liver resection group. CONCLUSION. Local ablation before liver transplant does not have a negative effect on outcomes after liver transplant for HCC