Therapeutic Potential of HDL in Cardioprotection and Tissue Repair

Epidemiological studies support a strong association between high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and heart failure incidence. Experimental evidence from different angles supports the view that low HDL is unlikely an innocent bystander in the development of heart failure. HDL exerts direct cardioprotective effects, which are mediated via its interactions with the myocardium and more specifically with cardiomyocytes. HDL may improve cardiac function in several ways. Firstly, HDL may protect the heart against ischaemia/reperfusion injury resulting in a reduction of infarct size and thus in myocardial salvage. Secondly, HDL can improve cardiac function in the absence of ischaemic heart disease as illustrated by beneficial effects conferred by these lipoproteins in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Thirdly, HDL may improve cardiac function by reducing infarct expansion and by attenuating ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction. These different mechanisms are substantiated by in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo intervention studies that applied treatment with native HDL, treatment with reconstituted HDL, or human apo A-I gene transfer. The effect of human apo A-I gene transfer on infarct expansion and ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction illustrates the beneficial effects of HDL on tissue repair. The role of HDL in tissue repair is further underpinned by the potent effects of these lipoproteins on endothelial progenitor cell number, function, and incorporation, which may in particular be relevant under conditions of high endothelial cell turnover. Furthermore, topical HDL therapy enhances cutaneous wound healing in different models. In conclusion, the development of HDL-targeted interventions in these strategically chosen therapeutic areas is supported by a strong clinical rationale and significant preclinical data.status: publishe

Une source inédite de phéromone chez Myrmica rubra L.

SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Utilisation du stomahesive dans le traitement des plaies de décubitus

Stomahesive for bedsores treatment was tested in two different clinics in Belgium: a center for traumatology and rehabilitation (CTR) and a neurological clinic for multiple sclerosis (CNF). The results were excellent in 80% of the 57 treated cases. Stomahesive is useful in superficial and deep wounds after cleaning or for protection of erythema and pressure points caused by orthesis. The dressing should be removed every 3 to 5 days and healing will appear after 6 weeks for a 5x5 cm lesion. The local tolerance was very good.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Progenitor cell mobilisation - Cyclophosphamide, etoposide and G-CSF to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide, etoposide and G-CSF (C+E) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma. A matched cohort study was performed comparing patients mobilized with C+E to patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF (C alone). Patients were matched for disease, prior radiotherapy and a chemotherapy score reflecting the amount and type of prior chemotherapy. Thirty-eight consecutive patients mobilized with C+E were compared with 38 matched controls. C+E was equivalent to C alone in terms of numbers of patients achieving a minimum threshold of greater than or equal to2 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells (82% vs 79%, P = 0.74). C+E was superior, however, in terms of total CD34(+) yield (6.35 vs 3.3 x 10(6)/kg, P < 0.01), achieving a target graft of greater than or equal to5 x 10(6)/kg (55% vs 34%, P = 0.04) and obtaining both a minimum (61% vs 32%, P < 0.01) and target (45% vs 13%, P < 0.01) graft in one apheresis. This superiority was largely confined to patients with lower chemotherapy scores. There was no difference in neutrophil and platelet recovery or transfusion requirements for those who subsequently received high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation. Thus, C+E improves the efficiency of peripheral blood stem cell collection, but does not increase the number of patients who can proceed to transplantation. Most of the benefit of the regimen was confined to patients who had not received extensive prior therapy. Novel strategies are required to increase the collection efficiency of 'hard to mobilize' patients