Gas Hydrate Sloughing as Observed and Quantified from Multiphase Flow Conditions

Sloughing of gas hydrates from deposits formed on the pipe wall is a phenomenon that can cause hydrate accumulation and blockage of the flow in oil/gas pipelines. While hydrate sloughing has been recognized as an important mechanism leading to hydrate blockage, its observation and measurements have not been reported. Experiments performed in a visual rocking cell to emulate multiphase flow conditions with a methane–ethane gas mixture, fresh water, and non-emulsifying oil or condensate as hydrocarbon liquid demonstrated that hydrate sloughing occurs at a wide range of subcooling and temperature gradient conditions. However, sloughing was not detected in a narrow operational window defined by both subcooling lower than 4 °C and temperature gradient in the cell lower than 1 °C. The potential existence of an operational window for conditions without sloughing might be valuable for the development of hydrate management strategies for blockage-free production

An Examination of the Prediction of Hydrate Formation Conditions in the Presence of Thermodynamic Inhibitors

<div><p>Abstract Gas hydrates are crystalline compounds, solid structures where water traps small guest molecules, typically light gases, in cages formed by hydrogen bonds. They are notorious for causing problems in oil and gas production, transportation and processing. Gas hydrates may form at pressures and temperatures commonly found in natural gas and oil production pipelines, thus causing partial or complete pipe blockages. In order to inhibit hydrate formation, chemicals such as alcohols (e.g., ethanol, methanol, mono-ethylene glycol) and salts (sodium, magnesium or potassium chloride) are injected into the produced stream. The purpose of this work is to briefly review the literature on hydrate formation in mixtures containing light gases (hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide) and water in the presence of thermodynamic inhibitors. Four calculation methods to predict hydrate formation in those systems were examined and compared. Three commercial packages (Multiflash®, PVTSim® and CSMGem) and a hydrate prediction routine in Fortran90 using the van der Waals and Platteeuw theory and the Peng-Robinson equation of state were tested. Predictions given by the four methods were compared to independent experimental data from the literature. In general, the four methods were found to be reasonably accurate. CSMGem and Multiflash® showed the best results.</p></div