Propofol in status epilepticus: little evidence, many dangers?

Several guidelines recommend the use of propofol for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. An increased mortality rate in high dose, long-term treatment with propofol in adult patients was published recently. This prompted us to assess the literature on the scientific evidence for the efficacy and safety of propofol in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Medline was searched and the three authors independently reviewed all Medline abstracts for selection of papers. We included 22 articles with original data on the use of propofol in refractory status epilepticus. Randomised clinical trials were lacking. Two non-randomised studies compared propofol with barbiturates and midazolam respectively. Both studies reported a higher risk of mortality for propofol. In addition, case reports and case series on the use of propofol as anaesthetic or sedative in children and adults reported several lethal cases. Serious doubts may be raised on the safety of propofol in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. The two non-randomised studies and several case reports show an increased risk of mortality. Guidelines should not recommend the use of propofol as a routine treatment in refractory status epilepticus before a proper randomised trial has been performe

Interobserver reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms in children with newly diagnosed seizures

The reliability of visual interpretation of electroencephalograms (EEG) is of great importance in assessing the value of this diagnostic tool. We prospectively obtained 50 standard EEGs and 61 EEGs after partial sleep deprivation from 93 children (56 males, 37 females) with a mean age of 6 years 10 months (SE 5mo; range 4mo-15y 7mo) with one or more newly diagnosed, unprovoked seizures. Two clinical neurophysiologists independently classified the background pattern and the presence of epileptiform discharges or focal non-epileptiform abnormalities of each EEG. The agreement was substantial for the interpretation of the EEG as normal or abnormal (kappa 0.66), almost perfect for the presence of epileptiform discharges (kappa 0.83), substantial for the occurrence of an abnormal background pattern (kappa 0.73), and moderate for the presence of focal non-epileptiform discharges (kappa 0.54). In conclusion, the reliability of the visual interpretation of EEGs in children is almost perfect as regards the presence of epileptiform, abnormalities, and moderate to substantial for the presence of other abnormalities

Childhood epilepsy with a small number of seizures may be left untreated: an international prospective study

Aims. It is unknown whether treatment with antiepileptic drugs in children with epilepsy with a presumed good prognosis is always necessary. We aimed to study the course of newly diagnosed epilepsy in children with a presumed good prognosis who are managed without AED treatment.Methods. A total of 151 children (one month to 12 years of age) with two to five lifetime unprovoked seizures (excluding febrile convulsions), were followed for three years. Treatment was initially withheld. Children with symptomatic epilepsy, or absence or myoclonic epilepsy, were excluded. AED treatment was started after >10 lifetime seizures or an episode of status epilepticus during follow-up, or if the parents or treating physician deemed it otherwise necessary.Results. During follow-up, 113 children continued to meet our criteria for refraining from treatment with antiepileptic drugs, yet 30 started treatment at the request of the parents. Thirty-eight children at some time met the criteria to start treatment, but the parents of 16 declined treatment. In all, 99 (66%) children maintained the no-treatment regime. Ninety-eight children (65% of 151) reached terminal remission for at least one year, including 83 who did not receive antiepileptic drug treatment (84% of the untreated 99). Mean terminal remission was significantly longer in the group with a total of 10 seizures. Treatment did not increase the length of terminal remission. Adverse events, including traumatic injury, occurred equally in the treated and untreated children. Measures of quality of life suggested a better outcome in those without treatment.Conclusions. Children with newly diagnosed epilepsy with a presumed good prognosis may not need immediate AED treatment. Postponing treatment does not alter the chance of remission or the risk of accidents and adverse events and appears to be associated with a good quality of life

Long term outcome of benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes:Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood

Purpose: Determine long-term outcome in a cohort of children with newly diagnosed benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS). Method: Thirty children with BECTS were included in the Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood. All children were followed for 12-17 years. Twenty children had typical BECTS, ten had atypical BECTS (age at onset 5 years and 89% of >10 years. Mean duration of epilepsy from onset to TRFwas 2.7 years; mean age at reaching TRFwas 10.6 years. Many children (63%) had experienced one or more (secondary) GTCS. Eighty percent had used antiepileptic drugs (mean duration 3.0 years). As far as we know, none of the children had developed learning problems or had shown any arrest of cognitive development during follow-up. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics or outcome between children with typical BECTS and children with atypical BECTS. Conclusion: All children in our cohort, both with typical and atypical BECTS, had a very good prognosis with high remission rates after 12-17 years. None of the predictive factors for disease course and outcome as described in earlier studies was prognostic in our cohort

Long-term outcome of childhood absence epilepsy: Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood

We determined long-term outcome and the predictive value of baseline and EEG characteristics on seizure activity evolution in 47 children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) included in the Dutch Study of Epilepsy in Childhood. All children were followed for 12-17 years. The children were subdivided in three groups for the analyses: those becoming seizure-free (1) within 1 month after enrolment; (11) 1-6 months after enrolment; and (111) more than 6 months after enrolment or having seizures continuing during follow-up. No significant differences were observed between groups in sex, age at onset, occurrence of febrile seizures, and positive first-degree family history for epilepsy. All groups had high remission rates after 12-17 years. Significantly more relapses occurred in group III than in group I. Total duration of epilepsy and mean age at final remission were 3.9 and 9.5 years, respectively, being significantly longer and higher in group III than in groups I and II. In all groups only a small number of children (total 13%) developed generalized tonic-clonic seizures. In conclusion, our children with CAE had an overall good prognosis with few children (7%) still having seizures after 12-17 years. Remission rate in children with CAE cannot be predicted on the basis of baseline and EEG characteristics. The early clinical course (i.e. the first 6 months) has some predictive value with respect to the total duration of absence epilepsy. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved