4 research outputs found
Soft Landing technique as a possible prevention strategy for proximal junctional failure following adult spinal deformity surgery
Recommended from our members
Rates and Factors Associated With Hardware Removal in Physeal Ankle Fractures: Analysis of the Pediatric Health Information System.
BackgroundAnkle fractures are among the most common physeal fractures in children. When surgical management is warranted, subsequent hardware removal remains controversial. This study was designed to determine rates of hardware removal in patients with physeal ankle fractures and identify risk factors for removal. Procedure data was utilized to compare rates of subsequent ankle procedures in patients with hardware removed and hardware retained.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) for the years 2015 through 2021. We longitudinally followed patients treated for distal tibia physeal fractures to determine the rates of hardware removal and subsequent ankle procedures. Patients with open fractures or polytrauma were excluded. We used univariate, multivariate, and descriptive statistics to characterize the rates of hardware removal, identify factors associated with removal, and assess the rates of subsequent procedures.ResultsThis study included 1008 patients who underwent surgical management of a physeal ankle fracture. The mean age at index surgery was 12.6 years with an SD of 2.2 years, and 60% of patients identified as male. Two hundred forty-two patients (24%) had their hardware removed at an average time of 276 days (range, 21-1435 days) following index surgery. Patients with Salter Harris III (SH-III) or Salter Harris IV (SH-IV) fractures had hardware removed more often than patients with Salter-Harris II (SH-II) fractures (28.9% vs 11.7%, P < .01). Four-year rates of subsequent ankle procedures are similar between patients with hardware removed and hardware retained.ConclusionThe rate of hardware removal in children with physeal ankle fractures is higher than previously reported. Patients of younger age, higher income, and with fractures involving the epiphysis (SH-III and SH-IV) are more likely to undergo hardware removal.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective study
Recommended from our members
Open Reduction and Suture Fixation of Acute Sternoclavicular Fracture-Dislocations in Children.
Acute sternoclavicular fracture-dislocation is associated with high-energy trauma and is being increasingly recognized in children1. These injuries are associated with compression of mediastinal structures and can be life-threatening1. The management of acute sternoclavicular fracture-dislocation includes closed reduction or open surgical stabilization; however, limited success is reported with closed reduction2,3. To our knowledge, there are no detailed descriptions of open reduction and suture fixation of acute sternoclavicular fracture-dislocation in children. Following diagnosis of acute sternoclavicular fracture-dislocation, the timing of surgical treatment is determined according to several patient and surgical factors. Among patients with hemodynamic instability, respiratory compromise, or evidence of asymmetric perfusion, surgical treatment is needed on an emergency basis. In the absence of these factors, surgical treatment can be performed on an urgent basis. It is important to communicate with vascular or thoracic surgeons prior to proceeding to the operating room because of the rare case in which advanced surgical access or vascular repair is required. In the operating room, general anesthesia and large-bore intravenous access are required. Patients are positioned supine on a radiolucent table, and a small bump is placed between the scapulae to elevate the medial aspect of the clavicle. The contralateral sternoclavicular joint and medial aspect of the clavicle should be prepared into the sterile field, as well as both sides of the groin in case vascular access is needed. A 6 to 8-cm incision is centered on the medial aspect of the clavicle, extending to the manubrium. Standard dissection to the clavicle is performed, and care is taken to maintain the integrity of the sternoclavicular ligament complex. Circumferential dissection of the medial clavicular metaphysis is usually required in order to mobilize the dislocated fragment. Reduction of the physeal fracture usually requires axial traction and extension of the ipsilateral shoulder with the aid of a reduction clamp on the medial clavicular metaphysis. In some cases, a Freer elevator can be placed between the metaphysis and epiphysis to shoehorn the clavicle from posterior to anterior. Once reduced, the fracture-dislocation is usually stable; however, the reduction is augmented with suture fixation. The sternoclavicular joint capsule should be repaired if disrupted, and the incision should be closed in layers. Postoperatively, the arm is placed in a sling, and range of motion is commenced at 4 weeks. Alternative management of acute sternoclavicular fracture-dislocation includes closed reduction, plate fixation4, and ligament reconstruction5. In our experience, closed reduction is often unsuccessful, which is consistent with the experiences reported by other authors2,3. In addition, suture fixation is sufficient and plate fixation is not required because this injury is relatively stable following reduction. Lastly, ligament reconstruction with use of autograft or allograft may be indicated but is more relevant in chronic cases with injury or attenuation of the sternoclavicular ligament complex. Open reduction allows for direct visualization of the fracture reduction, and suture fixation allows for increased stability without the need for hardware or secondary surgical procedures. We expect patients to achieve full range of motion and strength without any joint instability as reported by Waters et al.3. There is an inherent risk of vascular injury with open reduction and suture fixation. This risk is mitigated with perioperative planning and consultation with vascular or thoracic surgeons. General surgeons should always be available when these procedures are performed in case of vascular issues or emergencies.It is sometimes difficult to reduce the dislocation, but additional maneuvers allow for controlled reduction of the displaced clavicle, such as using a Freer elevator and serrated clamp.Assessing fracture reduction can be difficult intraoperatively. Including the contralateral sternoclavicular joint in the sterile surgical field can be helpful in assessing fracture reduction and osseous contour
Recommended from our members
Soft Landing technique as a possible prevention strategy for proximal junctional failure following adult spinal deformity surgery
BackgroundThis cross sectional study describes a "Soft Landing" strategy utilizing hooks for minimizing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF). The technique creates a gradual transition from a rigid segmental construct to unilateral hooks at the upper instrumented level and preservation of the soft tissue attachments on the contralateral side of the hooks. Authors devise a novel classification system for better grading of PJK severity.MethodsThirty-nine consecutive adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients at a single institution received the "Soft Landing" technique. The proximal junctional angle was measured preoperatively and at last follow-up using standing 36-inch spinal radiographs. Changes in proximal junctional angle and rates of PJK and PJF were measured and used to create a novel classification system for evaluating and categorizing ASD patients postoperatively.ResultsThe mean age of the cohort was 61.4 years, and 90% of patients were women. Average follow up was 2.2 years. The mean change in proximal junctional angle was 8° (SD 7.4°) with the majority of patients (53%) experiencing less than 10° and only 1 patients with proximal junctional angle over 20°. Four patients (10%) needed additional surgery for proximal extension of the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) secondary to PJF.ConclusionsSoft Landing technique is a possibly effective treatment strategy to prevent PJK and PJF following ASD that requires further evaluation. The described classification system provides management framework for better grading of PJK. The "Soft Landing" technique warrants further comparison to other techniques currently used to prevent both PJK and failure