RNA-seq of newly diagnosed patients in the PADIMAC study leads to a bortezomib/lenalidomide decision signature.

Improving outcomes in multiple myeloma will involve not only development of new therapies but also better use of existing treatments. We performed RNA sequencing on samples from newly diagnosed patients enrolled in the phase 2 PADIMAC (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, and Dexamethasone Therapy for Previously Untreated Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Deferred ASCT) study. Using synthetic annealing and the large margin nearest neighbor algorithm, we developed and trained a 7-gene signature to predict treatment outcome. We tested the signature in independent cohorts treated with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-based therapies. The signature was capable of distinguishing which patients would respond better to which regimen. In the CoMMpass data set, patients who were treated correctly according to the signature had a better progression-free survival (median, 20.1 months vs not reached; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.72; P = .0012) and overall survival (median, 30.7 months vs not reached; HR, 0.41; CI, 0.21-0.80; P = .0049) than those who were not. Indeed, the outcome for these correctly treated patients was noninferior to that for those treated with combined bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, arguably the standard of care in the United States but not widely available elsewhere. The small size of the signature will facilitate clinical translation, thus enabling more targeted drug regimens to be delivered in myeloma.Wellcome Trust, Bloodwise, Cancer Research UK

A randomised comparison of CPX-351 and FLAG-Ida in adverse karyotype AML and high-risk MDS: the UK NCRI AML19 trial

Liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) improves overall survival (OS) compared to 7+3 chemotherapy in older patients with secondary acute myeloid leukaemia (AML); to date there have been no randomized studies in younger patients. The high-risk cohort of the UK NCRI AML19 trial (ISRCTN78449203) compared CPX-351 with FLAG-Ida in younger adults with newly-diagnosed adverse cytogenetic AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). 189 patients were randomized (median age 56y). By clinical criteria 49% had de novo AML, 20% secondary AML and 30% high risk MDS. MDS-related cytogenetics were present in 73% of patients, with complex karyotype in 49%. TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene, in 43%. Myelodysplasia-related gene mutations were present in 75 patients (44%). The overall response rate (CR + CRi) after course two was 64% and 76% for CPX-351 and FLAG-Ida (OR:0.54, 95%CI 0.28-1.04, p=0.06). There was no difference in OS (13.3 months vs 11.4 months, HR:0.78, 95%CI 0.55-1.12, p=0.17) or event-free survival (HR:0.90, 95%CI 0.64-1.27, p=0.55) in multivariable analyses. However, relapse-free survival was significantly longer with CPX-351 (median 22.1 vs 8.35 months, HR:0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.95, p=0.03). There was no difference between the treatment arms in patients with clinically defined secondary AML (HR:1.1, 95%CI 0.52-2.30) or those with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities (HR:0.94, 95%CI 0.63-1.40), however an exploratory sub-group of patients with MDS-related gene mutations had significantly longer OS with CPX-351 (median 38.4 vs 16.3 months, HR:0.42, 95%CI 0.21-0.84, heterogeneity p=0.05). In conclusion, OS in younger patients with adverse risk AML/MDS was not significantly different between CPX-351 and FLAG-Ida

How to Simplify the Evaluation of Newly Introduced Chemotherapeutic Interventions in Myeloma

When the bortezomib [PS341], adriamycin and dexamethasone (PAD) regimen was first evaluated, the response rate in untreated patients was much superior to that elicited by conventional chemotherapeutic agents. We demonstrated the efficacy of PAD in relapsed or refractory patients by comparing the response rate obtained in 53 patients who received vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) or equivalent regimen as induction therapy, using a comparative design in which each patient acted as their own control. Whereas 25 patients had a positive response to VAD, 37 patients had a response to PAD ≤ partial remission (PR) (p = 0.023). Using the more stringent response level of very good PR (VGPR) the results favored the PAD regimen very significantly (p = 0.006) (McNemars test). Similar results were seen using paired M-protein levels from individual patient comparisons. As the PAD regimen was subsequently adopted as the re-induction therapy in the British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation/United Kingdom Myeloma Forum Myeloma X (Intensive) trial, now concluded, we have retrospectively analyzed the findings from both studies. Comparison of response rates and adverse effects of patients having had previous autologous transplantation (Cohort 1) with the corresponding data from Myeloma X showed close correlation. These findings provide evidence that rapid results may be obtained in the evaluation of newly introduced, and potentially highly effective, anti-tumour agents by direct comparison to the response to the immediately preceding standard regimen, particularly in relatively resistant tumours