13 research outputs found
Distribution of the âcompositeâ colposcopic histopathological diagnoses by the confirmatory diagnostic procedure (colposcopy or histopathology) among HIV-infected women in Pune, India.
<p>Distribution of the âcompositeâ colposcopic histopathological diagnoses by the confirmatory diagnostic procedure (colposcopy or histopathology) among HIV-infected women in Pune, India.</p
Unadjusted (bivariate) and multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis of predictors of disease prevalence for ordinal outcome in three categories of increasing disease severity (No CIN, CIN1, CIN2, â„CIN3) confirmed by composite colposcopic-histopathological diagnosis among HIV-infected women in Pune, India.
<p>Abbreviations: OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence intervals; INR: Indian Rupees; BMI: Body Mass Index; ART: Antiretroviral therapy; STI: Sexually transmitted infection; WHO: World Health Organization.</p>*<p>The number of covariates that could be included in the multivariable regression model was dependent on the number of event outcomes for that analysis to avoid over-fitting of the models. Hence only 10 covariates were included in the multivariable model. Covariates were deemed scientifically important and selected <i>a priori</i> along with covariates that were significant in unadjusted (bivariate) analysis.</p>â§<p>The exchange rate at the time of the study was approximately 45 INR (Indian Rupees) per US 22.</p
Distribution of sociodemographic variables as per final disease outcomes (confirmed by colposcopic histopathological diagnoses) among HIV-infected women in Pune, India.
<p>Abbreviations: IQR: interquartile ratio (25th percentile and 75th percentile), INR: Indian Rupees; BMI: Body Mass Index; ART: Antiretroviral therapy; STI: Sexually transmitted infection; WHO: World Health Organization.</p>â§<p>The exchange rate at the time of the study was approximately 45 INR (Indian Rupees) per US 22.</p
Study enrollment, procedures, and main outcomes.
<p>The flow diagram shows the number of HIV-infected women who were offered participation, those enrolled in the study, list of study procedures, and final diagnosis through the composite colposcopic-histopathological assessment.</p
Hazard ratios for second line failure or third line regimen start.
<p>Hazard ratios for second line failure or third line regimen start.</p
Cumulative incidence after HAART initiation of starting a third line regimen or failing a second line regimen.
<p>Cumulative incidence after HAART initiation of starting a third line regimen or failing a second line regimen.</p
Cohort description.
<p>Categorical variables are reported as percentages (count).</p><p>Continuous variables are reported as medians (interquartile range).</p><p>Cohort description.</p
Second line virologic failure. Patient descriptive statistics.
<p>Categorical variables are reported as percentages (count).</p><p>Continuous variables are reported as medians (interquartile range).</p><p>Second line virologic failure. Patient descriptive statistics.</p
Characteristics of the Study Population.
<p>HIV-infected persons who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART), received rifamycin-based anti-tuberculosis therapy while on ART, and did not have tuberculosis at a site of disease that required extended therapy (e g, central nervous system, bone/joint, or pericardium).</p><p>Parentheses include percentages unless otherwise noted.</p><p>TB: tuberculosis</p><p>Baseline CD4+ lymphocyte and HIV-1 RNA measurements were at the time of ART initiation.</p><p>* The proportions of all persons at each study site with TB (the row percentages)âwere as follows:</p><p>Argentina: 3%; Brazil: 7%; Chile: 4%; Honduras: 9%; Mexico: 4%; Peru: 16%</p><p>^ Median (IQR) values before tuberculosis diagnosis: 74 (34-191)</p><p># Median (IQR values before tuberculosis diagnosis: 4.4 log<sub>10</sub> (2.6-5.2)</p
Baseline and Treatment Characteristics of the 253 Tuberculosis Patients Included in the Study, According to Length of Follow-up/Survival and Duration of Anti-tuberculosis Therapy.
<p>Data are presented as number (%) except as shown.</p><p>P-values are for the comparison of all 4 groups, using the chi-squared test.</p><p>* the comparison limited to persons with > 6 months of follow-up and known TB treatment duration (the two inner columns) was not statistically significant. If not noted by * the statistical significance of the comparison between these two groups was similar to that of all 4 groups.</p><p>=Data available for 222 patients.</p><p>^ Data available for 222 patients.</p><p># Data available for 171 patients.</p><p>+ Data available for 228 patients.</p><p>a median time between TB diagnosis and ART start: 95 days (IQR: 53, 142)</p><p>b median time between ART start and TB diagnosis: 142 days (IQR: 30, 568)</p