Use of the General Movements Assessment for the Early Detection of Cerebral Palsy in Infants with Congenital Anomalies Requiring Surgery

The general movements (GMs) assessment is recognised as one of the most important tools in the early detection of cerebral palsy (CP). However, there remains a paucity of data on its application to infants with congenital anomalies requiring surgery. This was a prospective study of 202 infants (mean gestation 38 weeks, SD 2.2) who had undergone major surgery for congenital anomalies in the neonatal period. Infants were assessed at three months of age (mean 12 weeks, SD 1.6) and GMs videos were independently rated by three clinicians, two blinded to clinical details. Developmental follow-up was at three years of age. Of the twenty-five infants (9%) rated as having an absence of fidgety movements, 22 were seen at 3 years, and 17 had an abnormal outcome: 11 with CP, and 6 with a developmental disability. Infants with absent fidgety movements were 21.5 (95% CI 7.3–63.8) times more likely to have an abnormal outcome including CP. None of the infants with normal fidgety movements had a diagnosis of CP and 86% were assessed to be developing normally. The GMs assessment has predictive value for cerebral palsy and neurodevelopment for infants with congenital anomalies, and should be incorporated into routine follow-up to facilitate early referral

The evolution of an interdisciplinary developmental round in a surgical neonatal intensive care unit

Background: Developmentally supportive environments are known to improve medical outcomes for hospitalized neonates and are considered the overarching philosophy for practice in the neonatal setting. Developmental rounds are a strategy incorporated by multidisciplinary teams to support development within and beyond the neonatal unit. Typically, they consist of bedside consultations and individualized developmentally supportive recommendations for families and clinicians. Globally, the use of developmental rounds has been described since the early 1990s. They are viewed as a measure to counter some of the barriers to developmental care implementation while buffering against the effect of an intensive care admission. To date, their use in the surgical neonatal intensive care unit (sNICU) has been minimally reported in literature. Purpose: This article describes the focus and work of a developmental round team and strategy in the sNICU. Method: A retrospective audit of developmental round key performance criteria undertaken over a 4-year period (2015-2018). Findings/Results: More than 300 developmental consults and 2000 individualized developmental recommendations occurred annually. Parental presence during the developmental round increased by 10%, from 48% to 58%, during the audit period. Implications for Practice/Implications for Research: Literature has supported the use of developmental round interventions; however, minimal data have been reported to date. This article provides retrospective audit data of a developmental round intervention in the sNICU with a focus on data over 4 years to highlight key areas, including the structure and process, recommended educational standards for team members, and parental engagement, as key markers for developmental round efficacy. Future research should focus on the link between the developmental round intervention and long-term neonatal outcomes