Characteristics of the participants.

<p>^aFGD: focus group discussion.</p><p>^bBased on the socioeconomic index classification used in Census data.</p><p>^cBased on the classification used inthe Swedish education system (SUN).</p><p>Characteristics of the participants.</p

Examples of the analytical process.

<p>Omitted phrases are indicated by “(…)”, and hesitation indicated by “…”, whereas square brackets "[] " indicate authors’ comments. The FGDs are labelled [FGD A] to [FGD H] (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0107624#pone.0107624.t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>) and the participants in each FGD are numbered P1 to P7.</p><p>Examples of the analytical process.</p

Description of attendance at cervical screening of FGD-participants based on information from National Quality Register of Cervical Cancer Prevention (NQRCP)^a.

<p>^aAttendance at cervical screening is calculated according to the recommendations of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. The time in mean years delay for all visits per women was calculated from the completion of the third year at ages 23 to 50 years and the fifth 5 year at ages 51 to 60 years. Non-attendance to screening does not necessarily mean that women have never participated. Non-attendance should be interpreted as non-adherence to Swedish screening recommendations.</p><p>Description of attendance at cervical screening of FGD-participants based on information from National Quality Register of Cervical Cancer Prevention (NQRCP)<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0107624#t002fn001" target="_blank">^a</a>.</p

Distribution of demographic characteristics and response rate of the study sample.

<p>Distribution of demographic characteristics and response rate of the study sample.</p

Correlates to men's STI risk perception.

<p> <b>Descriptive statistics and mutually adjusted binomial, multivariable regression model. Model adjusted for all variables presented in the table. Probability modeled low STI risk.</b></p><p>Low risk is defined as responses no or low risk for contracting STIs and high risk defined as responses rather high or high risk for contracting STIs.</p><p>*Based on likelihood ratio test.</p

Correlates of condom use with temporary partners for women.

<p>*based on likelihood ratio test.</p><p> <b>Descriptive statistics and mutually adjusted multinomial, multivariable regression model. Model adjusted for all variables presented in the table. Always/almost always condom use is reference group. Odds ratios show excess risk of using condoms often/sometimes or seldom/never instead of always/almost always, compared to the reference level of each exposure.</b></p