Interexaminer Agreement and Reliability of an Internationally Endorsed Screening Framework for Cervical Vascular Risks Following Manual Therapy and Exercise:The Go4Safe Project

Objective: Clinicians are recommended to use the clinical reasoning framework developed by the International Federation of Orthopaedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) to provide guidance regarding assessment of the cervical spine and potential for cervical artery dysfunction prior to manual therapy and exercise. However, the interexaminer agreement and reliability of this framework is unknown. This study aimed to estimate the interexaminer agreement and reliability of the IFOMPT framework among physical therapists in primary care. Methods: Ninety-six patients who consulted a physical therapist for neck pain or headache were included in the study. Each patient was tested independently by 2 physical therapists, from a group of 17 physical therapists (10 pairs) across The Netherlands. Patients and examiners were blinded to the test results. The overall interexaminer agreement, specific agreement per risk category (high-, intermediate-, and low-risk), and interexaminer reliability (weighted κ) were calculated. Results: Overall agreement was 71% (specific agreement in high-risk category = 63%; specific agreement in intermediate-risk category = 38%; specific agreement in low-risk category = 84%). Overall reliability was moderate (weighted κ = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.21-0.57) and varied considerably between pairs of physical therapists (κ = 0.14-1.00). Conclusion: The IFOMPT framework showed an insufficient interexaminer agreement and fair interexaminer reliability among physical therapists when screening the increased risks for vascular complications following manual therapy and exercise prior to treatment. Impact: The IFOMPT framework contributes to the safety of manual therapy and exercise. It is widely adopted in clinical practice and educational programs, but the measurement properties are unknown. This project describes the agreement and reliability of the IFOMPT framework

Translating the new International IFOMPT Cervical Framework into a framework flowchart for clinical practice and education

BACKGROUND: In 2020, a revised version of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework was published. This framework provides both physical therapists and educators the necessary information to guide the assessment of the cervical spine region for potential vascular pathologies of the neck in advance of planned Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) interventions. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a framework flowchart which is useful in clinical practice and education to assist physical therapists to improve the safety of OMT, and apply this in a case report. METHODS: The framework was developed in co-creation with manual therapy experts, researchers, educators in manual therapy, patients, medical specialists and the Manual Therapy Association in The Netherlands and Belgium. Manual therapists and patients tested the framework for intelligibility and usefulness. RESULTS: A framework flowchart is developed and presented, that is easy to use in both clinical practice and education. It is a visual representation of the sequence of steps and decisions needed during the process. A case description of a patient with neck pain and headache is added to illustrate the clinical usefulness of the framework flowchart. CONCLUSION: The framework flowchart helps physical therapists in their clinical reasoning to provide safe OMT interventions

Translating the new International IFOMPT Cervical Framework into a framework flowchart for clinical practice and education

BACKGROUND: In 2020, a revised version of the International IFOMPT Cervical Framework was published. This framework provides both physical therapists and educators the necessary information to guide the assessment of the cervical spine region for potential vascular pathologies of the neck in advance of planned Orthopaedic Manual Therapy (OMT) interventions. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a framework flowchart which is useful in clinical practice and education to assist physical therapists to improve the safety of OMT, and apply this in a case report. METHODS: The framework was developed in co-creation with manual therapy experts, researchers, educators in manual therapy, patients, medical specialists and the Manual Therapy Association in The Netherlands and Belgium. Manual therapists and patients tested the framework for intelligibility and usefulness. RESULTS: A framework flowchart is developed and presented, that is easy to use in both clinical practice and education. It is a visual representation of the sequence of steps and decisions needed during the process. A case description of a patient with neck pain and headache is added to illustrate the clinical usefulness of the framework flowchart. CONCLUSION: The framework flowchart helps physical therapists in their clinical reasoning to provide safe OMT interventions

Pericranial Total Tenderness Score in Patients with Tension-type Headache and Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Increased pericranial tenderness is considered to be a typical characteristic of tension-type headache (TTH). Assessment of pericranial tenderness in TTH using the total tenderness score is recommended by the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3). However, to what extent pericranial tenderness differs between patients with TTH or migraine and healthy patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence and differences in total tenderness score between patients with TTH or migraine, and healthy patients. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases from inception to August 14, 2020 and identified 4,197 hits. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data, and performed a risk of bias assessment according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. From the 185 papers identified, 15 case-control and 2 cross-sectional studies were included. RESULTS: In total 1,200 (327 men, 873 women) patients with TTH or migraine were included in the systematic review. In the meta-analysis, 15 studies were analyzed and showed that the total tenderness score is higher in people with episodic TTH (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 1.19), chronic TTH (SMD 1.57; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.91) and migraine (SMD 1.27; 95% CI: 0.91to 1.63) compared to healthy patients. LIMITATIONS: The description and performance of the total tenderness score differed across the studies. In 7 studies, patients were included with coexisting types of headache. CONCLUSION: We found moderate quality evidence for higher tenderness in chronic TTH and migraine, and low quality evidence for higher tenderness in episodic TTH compared to healthy patients. Pericranial tenderness is a common finding in patients with headache and healthy patients. These findings apply for a critical evaluation of the total tenderness score in the current ICHD-3 classification of TTH

Pericranial Total Tenderness Score in Patients with Tension-type Headache and Migraine. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Increased pericranial tenderness is considered to be a typical characteristic of tension-type headache (TTH). Assessment of pericranial tenderness in TTH using the total tenderness score is recommended by the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3). However, to what extent pericranial tenderness differs between patients with TTH or migraine and healthy patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the presence and differences in total tenderness score between patients with TTH or migraine, and healthy patients. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar databases from inception to August 14, 2020 and identified 4,197 hits. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted data, and performed a risk of bias assessment according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Overall evidence was assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. From the 185 papers identified, 15 case-control and 2 cross-sectional studies were included. RESULTS: In total 1,200 (327 men, 873 women) patients with TTH or migraine were included in the systematic review. In the meta-analysis, 15 studies were analyzed and showed that the total tenderness score is higher in people with episodic TTH (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 1.19), chronic TTH (SMD 1.57; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.91) and migraine (SMD 1.27; 95% CI: 0.91to 1.63) compared to healthy patients. LIMITATIONS: The description and performance of the total tenderness score differed across the studies. In 7 studies, patients were included with coexisting types of headache. CONCLUSION: We found moderate quality evidence for higher tenderness in chronic TTH and migraine, and low quality evidence for higher tenderness in episodic TTH compared to healthy patients. Pericranial tenderness is a common finding in patients with headache and healthy patients. These findings apply for a critical evaluation of the total tenderness score in the current ICHD-3 classification of TTH